AMD + AMD really is the worst combo

AMD anything is awful
t.switched from a 290x to 1070 and havent looked back

>>57491445
>>57491442
>dx11
Is this 2013?

>>57491442
>>57491445
wtf

>>57491456

AMD certainly performs like its 2013.

wow I didn't know a piledriver chip would be slower than a haswell chip, good job detective you've really uncovered something unusual, better notify Intel and AMD of this bizarre phenomenon immediately

Intel + AMD is the best. AMD cpus blow for gaymen

>>57491442
gotta wait for the game-ready drivers as always
why the fuck does this nonsense still fucking happen
why are game devs such faggots

>>57491477

They perform the same with nvidia gpu fuckwit.

/v/ tourist general? What's your favorite video game boys? Who'd win in a fight between Mario, Zelda and Superman? Do you prefer mom to pack you roll-ups or rice crispy treats in your lunch box? What's your snapchat?

>>57491479
enjoy your frame stuttering, double the power usage of Nvidia, and lack of OpenGL drivers

>>57491512
>actually thinking this

Down syndrome.

>>57491526
my snapchat is big_moist pls add

>>57491572
>didn't even bother to look at the second post in the fucking thread

I don't think you have down syndrome, you're just a fucking retard.

>>57491442
lmao. in 2016 theres no competition. nvidia/intel are blowing amd the fuck out

>$1000+ CPU outperforms sub-$200 cpu D2 devs didn't give a shit about optimizing for

you sure showed them my dude

>>57491584
Somebody needs to sell the x86 license to some rich chink company so AMD can finally die

>>57491597

>talking about "cpu optimization"
>charts clearly showing amd driver limitation

Please tell me more wise one

>>57491467
What do you expect from a depreciated API?

Using an API from 2011, it's impressive to see 2013 performance.

>>57491442
>$1400 CPU beats a $300 CPU
never would've guessed.

>>57491627
>current year
>dx 11

File: BF 1 dx11 vs dx12.jpg (118KB, 1279x477px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1279x477px

>>57491456
Dx12 is garbage.
No dev has the fucking time to optimise it.
We will probably see dx12 die off like dx10 did.
Devs can't finish the game, let alone spend a month figuring how to optmise AMD's garbage software

>>57491627
Looks more like AMD CPU limitation

>>57492426
See >>57491445

>>57492439
Yeah, its the same curve as the intel+amd gpu.

AMD GPU is a tier below nvidia, if you compare the rx480 with 1060, you'd see a very close fps scenario.

>>57492367
So we're just supposed to accept graphical stagnation in your view then?

This boils down to devs, or more specifically the standard they are being held to for developing games mostly suited be "good enough" for the current crop of weak-ass consoles being garbage, not DX12 itself.

>>57492453
You have zero idea what this thread is even about.

>>57492453
So you admit to being wrong and that it wasn't AMD CPU limitation?

>>57492484
>graphical stagnation
Dx11 isn't even that bad
It can easily be improved without relying on devs.

Maybe dx13 will have the dx12 benefits without the hassle.

Optimising AMD hardware and software is not an easy talk.
Everything AMD does is inefficient

>>57492605
Devs are always resistant to doing more work and there is no doubt that DX12 requires more work to be effective, but when utilized properly it will be way more efficient than DX11 ever could be.

Right now there is just no market pressure for them to be better. It'll take a few years.

>>57492367
This isn't a bf1 thread you fucking idiot. Stop cherry picking

File: 1474616788664.jpg (157KB, 680x823px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 680x823px

>>57492723
>Proof why I'm wrong is Cherry picking

>>57492855
>frame-times
literally meme data

>>57491805
So it's okay that AMD perform badly at a well established API?

>>57493022
>well-established API
>good

DX11 is one of these things.

File: Bait_Simplistic.jpg (25KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 800x600px

>>57491528 (you)

>>57492855
>Retard: The Post
10 milliseconds is splitting hairs anon. Try harder.

>>57493116
Well-established, yes.

So why is it okay that AMD is poor at it?

>>57491442
>shit game with denuvu
>8 year old engine
>runs like shit

File: dx12furyx.png (12KB, 620x269px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 620x269px

>>57492982
>literally meme data
Frame times can make or break ur experience.
Fps is only a number, meaningless without frame times.

>>57493193
>10 milliseconds is splitting hairs anon. Try harder.

What part of "stuttering experience" do you not understand?
Making a furyX feel worse than a GtX 980 is a bad thing.