Please redpill me on Intel NUC.
I was considering getting one as a semi-mobile unit. Working between home and the office (freelance, can't leave the machine there - but getting a screen isn't a problem). Any laptops with decent specs are at least $300-500 dollars more (except maybe old Thinkpads).
Planning on using it with Adobe PS and Illustrator, where an i5-6260U, 16 GB of RAM and an SSD should be enough.
All sounds good (well, except having only two cores, but most laptops are the same), but reading reviews on newegg and other sites they seem to have had a lot of BIOS issues in the past - at least that was the case with the latest generation.
http://www.fanlesstech.com/2016/07/exclusive-kaby-lake-apollo-lake-nuc.html
Wait for Kaby Lake or Apollo Lake NUCs
>>57452668
I actually might, very interesting thanks Anon
>>57452652
They seem awfully overpriced considering they aren't even fully kitted out under most circumstances. I think they're only somewhat relevant considering AMD typically offers the best bang for the buck.
You'd probably get a far better deal building something based off the Asrock deskmini or something like that. At the very least, you could get equal performance for far cheaper or superior performance for about the same price.
Why not get the Skull Trail one. The Apollo lake will be much weaker.
Skull Canyon NUC Features
IntelCore i7-6770HQprocessor (Quad-core, max. 3.5 GHz, TDP 45 W)Intel Iris Pro 580 GraphicsTwo DDR4 SO-DIMM sockets (up to 32 GB, 2133+ MHz)Two M.2 slots with flexible support for a 42 or 80 mm SATA or PCIe SSDIntegrated Wireless-AC 8260 and Bluetooth 4.2 adapterSDXC card reader (UHS-I)Four USB 3.0 ports (including one charging port)Consumer infrared sensorIntel Gigabit LAN adapterOne Mini DisplayPort version 1.2One Thunderbolt 3 port with USB 3.1 (USB Type-C connector)One full-size HDMI 2.0 display port
>>57453145
this is the only nuc worth considering, if it's not being used as a thin client.
>>57452984
It's a bit bigger, hence less portable. But still pretty small. I will look into it.
>>57453145
Shame it looks so tacky.
>>57452652
The Intel Nucs are far overpriced. Get a Best China Quality Nuc instead.
>>57453309
That looks horrible.
Have an i5 intel nuc forget which gen 1 or 2 gens old I bought for a media centre in my main theatre room.
Thing has been absolutely bullet proof and done every single thing I've asked of it. Never had one single issue.
Honestly considering when I finally scrap my gaming PC getting one and just mounting it on the back of a nice 27 4K monitor now I no longer game.
>>57453345
Depends on what you're wanting to use it for, mine is a Firewall.
Don't buy the Skull Trail NUC because Skylake is outdated and can't hardware decode HEVC Main10 or VP9 Profile2 10bit like Kaby Lake can
Also Skull Traill is $600+
>>57452668
Didn't know about this, will upgrade my esxi box from a haswell nuc finally. These things are great for little homelabs <3
>>57453282
You can replace the top lid with a plain one. It seems nicer, imo, because it's not so tall as the ordinary NUCs and it has the best hardware. It looks like a router, yeah, not so sexy, but still it's a very useful PC for such a small footprint.
I would get one just for work, myself. Considering you can replace parts easily, that's also good.
>>57453384
It's the one with the best hardware tho.
>Kaby lake
>28W i7 Processors
It looks like Intel wants to sell underpowered cheaper versions, they're desperate for some market.
Compare that to i7 at 45W TDP. You can't possibly get the same processing power at almost half the same power in one year. So they're selling a diluted version for consumers.