[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Mozilla removes browser extension “Web of Trust”

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 42
Thread images: 7

File: 1478169855865.png (311KB, 439x456px) Image search: [Google]
1478169855865.png
311KB, 439x456px
from its store, because it collects, records, analyzes and sells user-related data to third-parties

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WOT_Services
>>
Seriously? And here to think I trusted them all along
>>
mozilla confirmed goat
>>
File: shit.jpg (4KB, 250x179px) Image search: [Google]
shit.jpg
4KB, 250x179px
>>57379042
fug i have that installed on my browsers
>>
only imbeciles used extensions like wot
>>
>TRUSTING OPEN SORES SOFTWARE
>>
Source in German https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Abgegriffene-Browserdaten-Mozilla-entfernt-Web-of-Trust-3455990.html

NO ENGLISH LANGUAGE PUBLICATION HAS WRITTEN ABOUT THIS YET

IT HAS 870.000 USERS
>>
A team of journalists made a dummy corporation and bought lots of data about 3 million users. The data also contained intimate details of Journalists and high-ranking german politicians. The browser plugin "Web of Trust" was identified as one of the sources of said data, which was supposed to protect from illegal data collection and fraud.

source: Rough translation of a passage from the article posted above.
If you have any questions about the article feel free to ask, altough i won't translate it fully.
>>57379295
it doesn't seem to be open source
besides, this kind of shit is much easier to conceal in proprietary software
>>
>>57379057
Selling malware as security is one the magician oldest tricks. Same applies to "free" VPN services, or fake anti virus solutions.

>>57380076
>Open sores will protect me against somebody mishandling my data on a server I have no control over

Gee wizz lad you probablt use Google CHromium by google with free open sored dns service.
>>
>web of trust
>its not trust worthy
The irony
>>
>>57380157
google chrome is well known as highly questionable, and it doesn't really try to hide that either considering you can fucking make an account or whatever that crap is. Open source is by no means an insurance against spionage it just makes it harder to hide.
>>
>>57380189
Or makes it easier to trick the users with false feeling of security. When you create spyware you rarely put shit in the client side software. You spy on server side which is by no means prevented by open source.
>>
>>57380163
how did you come up with that zinger?
>>
>>57380229
but you can see what the client sends and why, web of trust has no business sending heaps of user data, especially not unanonymized
>>
>>57380255
It sends all url you visit or are about to visit for "verification". This is more then enough to effectively spy on you.
>>
>>57380274
web of trust or chrome?
>>
>>57379042
So, the same thing that Firefox does with Google?
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-does-phishing-and-malware-protection-work#w_what-information-is-sent-to-mozilla-or-its-partners-when-phishing-and-malware-protection-are-enabled
>>
Mozilla has a store?
>>
>>57379079
this tbqh
>>
>>57379077
lol
people on /g/ falling for these extensions
im not even surprised
>>
>>57380238
I stare at myself in a big mirror that's in my living room until a quality post dawns on me
>>
>>57379042

Just use noscript you dipshit, know nothing millennials
>>
>>57380440
I always disable all that since uMatrix already has blocklists that work well
>>
Disappointed, but not surprised. If you're not paying for the product, you are the product. Actually, it was my only reason for sticking with Mozilla; go Chrome? Then again, won't make much difference.
>>
>>57380498
>mfw noscript probably collects and sells user data too
>>
THIS IS WHAT YOU GET FOR TRUSTING OPEN SORES
>>
>>57379042
Firstly Mozilla don't have any store as Chrome, it's free.
Secondly, same thing happens on Chromium browsers etc...
>>
>>57380583
but you can read(and modify) the source code of the extension anytime you want.
>>
That addon is absolute shit, especially after they simplified their model to be mostly about child safety.
I bet the only people who still use it anymore are the ones who downloaded it years ago and simply never bothered uninstalling.
>>
File: botnet.png (264KB, 402x578px) Image search: [Google]
botnet.png
264KB, 402x578px
>>57379042
people actually used that shit?
>>
>>57381311
lot of anons here even use ghostery, noscript, adblock plus and other botnets like wot
>>
File: oi vey.jpg (175KB, 900x1350px) Image search: [Google]
oi vey.jpg
175KB, 900x1350px
>>57379077
>falling for snake oil
/g/ truly is the home of the /g/oyim
>>
>>57381311
are you new or something, i see some retard using trash like abp, disconnect or ghostery everyday on /g/ not to mention the Cúck Cúck Go botnet
>>
>>57379042
>original creators left in 2014
>became TOW Software sometime last year
>ceases operations in June of this year
>>
>>57379057
U can stil benefit from that service w/out that plugin.

Duckduck has a setting option which enables WOT-ratings in the returned results.

personally I've ditched it two years ago while installing [spoiler]uMatrix[/spoiler].
>>
>>57380498
>Just use noscript you dipshit, know nothing millennials

You mean just use uMatrix you dipshit, know-nothing /v/tard.
>>
File: netanyahu-and-putin.jpg (28KB, 463x298px) Image search: [Google]
netanyahu-and-putin.jpg
28KB, 463x298px
>>57381598
>Jew Jew Go
>switching from one botnet to another
>>
>>57381598
Good to know, i hate addons anyway.
>>
>>57380795
>Don't have any store as chrome, it's free

god have the users here really become this dumb?
>>
Glad I never used it then. Of course, I don't see the point of using a reputation service when you can just practice some common sense.
>>
File: j33vesu.jpg (19KB, 217x320px) Image search: [Google]
j33vesu.jpg
19KB, 217x320px
>tfw i have been using it for 2+ years

JUST
>>
File: matsumoto pink hat.jpg (73KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]
matsumoto pink hat.jpg
73KB, 612x612px
>>57381408
>>57381562
Thread posts: 42
Thread images: 7


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.