Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
Anonymous
Apple makes the best CPU 2016-11-02 07:03:54 Post No. 57350036
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Apple makes the best CPU 2016-11-02 07:03:54 Post No. 57350036
[Report] Image search: [Google]
Hey /g/, did you know that the A10 Fusion chip is so good that it's not only being used in DDOS supercomputers, it will also be used in the James Webb telescope, they will use it because it is technically the only 256-bit chip available nowadays (it is a quad-core 64-bit, 64*4 = 256bit), and because of that, it can process huge amount of images and data at the same time.
Intel also confirmed that they will be making 256-bit processors, just like Apple, showing that they are following Apple's steps into making processors, that's just amazing that an iPhone has better technology and more horse power than an intel Xeon server.
I don't like Apple, but they made a really good job with this chip, and thinking that NASA will use it shows that they really revolutionized the ARM architecture, and also revolutionized the world in general, because it's the first time in history that you have the processing power of a telescope in your pocket.
>>
>>57350036
Someone's FX9590 is 512-bit I heard
>>
>>57350036
>(it is a quad-core 64-bit, 64*4 = 256bit)
>muh space
it's a Reddit trap, do not (You) beyond this point, /g/
>>
>>57350036
The R9 Fury X is 1024bit
Checkmate athiests.
>>
>>57350221
Not a trap though.
4 concurrent 64-bit instructions === single 256-bit instruction
>>
File: 13819318_1141707755850275_1162556405_n.jpg (7KB, 191x226px) Image search:
[Google]
7KB, 191x226px
>>57350253
>>
File: noquality.png (284KB, 721x573px) Image search:
[Google]
284KB, 721x573px
>>57350253
>>
File: 172924faatv22tta3fo7we.png (83KB, 413x248px) Image search:
[Google]
83KB, 413x248px
>>57350036
>James Webb telescope
Will be using the BAE RAD750
>(it is a quad-core 64-bit, 64*4 = 256bit)
nice b8 m8
>>
>>57350036
Isn't that AVX?
>>
>>57350253
my dued, people have to rewrite programs for that shit. As soon as you have any kind of threading, you can get the same parallelism benefits without rewriting your program for 32/64/128/256 bit or whatever.
You really have to contrive situations that would be better for this shit than a larger number of commodity CPUs or a GPU. Get your parallelism like a normal kid instead of using something for which you will literally need to rewrite everything to take full advantage of
>>
>>57350253
a 64-bit register is a 64-bit register no matter how many 64-bit registers there are my man
now kill yourself
>>
File: Intel-Core-i7-6950X_1.jpg (304KB, 1524x1600px) Image search:
[Google]
304KB, 1524x1600px
If 4*64 = 256bits then how many would have x6950?
>>
>>57350408
>Will be using the BAE RAD750
>110 MHz to 200 MHz
Gay.
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5