/g/ BTFO

How does that BTFO /g/? They're not programmers now because they sucked at it;.

Tru Fax, Anon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Hopper

File: 2012-12-06 richard stallman 590.jpg (26KB, 590x366px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 590x366px

>>57294323
I'll just make an argument that if someone did something first that they'll always be at the forefront of that given profession. They where also used to scan the sky for spotting supernova and new planets once upon a time but thankfully where made obsolete by modern computers, kind of ironic huh anon? now fuck off

>>57294372
>same 2 or 3 women get posted as examples that "women can do this toooo!!!111
>can literally pull out books filled with names of men who have made as much or more contribution to a field

>>57294323
So what? That doesn't make modern feminist """"coders"""" good programmers.

>>57294323
I support programs to increase girls in tech

but unless you were part in deciding what plug goes where, and you are just plugging from a chart somebody made, you are a codemonkey much like todays pajeets.

>>57294462

I posted that link because Grace Hopper was one of the first programmers using high level language.

Computer programming was alot different in in the 1950's and 1960's. Most programmers were top level Mathematicians etc. .

File: the original cuck.png (132KB, 234x254px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 234x254px

I fucking hate it when numale cucks include the names of "prominent women in computing" in their projects.

>>57294323
Women are inferior to men, it can be scientifically proven because women are less interested in science. It's like how you can use science to prove blacks are dumber than whites. I bet that whore slept with men for promotions and took credit for white male success.

File: weebs.png (11KB, 1057x96px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 1057x96px

Wiremonkeys is the correct term.

>>57294335

I don't care

Yes. None of this matters. Anyone can be a good programmer. The merit of your code stands on its own.