What is the best way to prevent/limit browser fingerprinting?
What is the best possible score you can realistically get on this site?
What's yours?(Optional)
https://panopticlick.eff.org/
Just stay in between other sheeple.
A grey Zone for autists like (You)
ALSO
BE SURE TO HAVE A UNIQUE UA STRING:
It's cool !!
>>57284089
Click 'Show Results' and tell us your score
>>57284077
>A grey Zone for autists like (You)
What does that entail exactly? Using normie browsers? Using a good user.js?
>>57284115
Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 162,555 tested so far.
Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that conveys at least 17.31 bits of identifying information.
The measurements we used to obtain this result are listed below. You can read more about our methodology, statistical results, and some defenses against fingerprinting here.
Use a VM with a different OS installed, and connect through a VPN or rotating proxy.
>>57284153
Not good
Am I safe from the botnet?
>>57284621
>>57284040
If you're worried about actual fingerprinting, just run the most common browser on the most common OS, without any extensions. You can spend a million hours ricing your firefox to be more anonymous but it'll only become more unique, fingerprinting-wise.
If you don't want to be tracked, look into using noscript, self-destructing cookies, and some other extensions.
>>57284944
And if you wanna go full snowden, have a look at tails linux or qubes os
>>57284944
>just run the most common browser on the most common OS
>Windows 10
>Google Chrome
fuck
>>57285348
lel
how'd I do?
>>57285348
win 7 is still more common
>>57285893
Sweet. What OS, browser? If you dont mind me asking?
>>57285893
get on my level cunt
>>57285923
Win10, firefox 49.0.2
Noscript and ublock origin
>>57285960
Well played
*tips fedora*
>>57285348
You don't have to actually run it.
You only need to make your useragent match.
>>57285976
Seriously though, why does Winblows give a higher value for the user agent than Ubuntu? Shouldn't it be the other way around?
>>57284944
>If you're worried about actual fingerprinting, just run the most common browser on the most common OS, without any extensions.
There's no need to do that. There are extensions that can spoof your useragent string so it only looks like you're using a common browser and OS configuration.
>>57286058
>no javascript
welp, that's a red flag right there
>>57286191<form ...>
<noscript>
<input type="hidden" name="this_user_is_a_fag" value="true"/>
</noscript>
...
</form>
and here is how they will get you
>>57284040
best score I've seen is around 1 in 50 (with Tor)
>>57284621
>Nintendo Wii
>>57286205
>not blocking <noscript> elements
>>57285893
How did you finish the test with JavaScript disabled? It just got stuck for me when I had it disabled.
>>57284040
I'm guessing it's best to use a User Agent switcher that switches browser profiles every request/every few minutes
>>57286618
Allow a bunch of redirects. A message should pop up at the top. I had to temporarily allow some stuff ublock picked up aswell.
>>57284621
>wingdings
fucking lel
>>57286626
Also pic
thanks rms
>>57286670
>wingdings 2 & 3
>1 in 14.09 have this value
>>57287151
Which user agent?
>>57287289
It says right in the image you fucking retard.
>>57287151
>>57287289
Kek nevermind
uBlock didn't even let it finish, just got stuck at
https://trackersimulator.org/tracker-reporting-nojs
Does this mean I win?
>>57287151
>he cares about browser fingerprinting from a static ip
>>57287522
>tor
>static ip
nigga are you four reel
>>57286618
Why do you wanna finish the test anyways, there's no point to it if you mostly browse with javascript disabled.
The whole thing was just designed to make normies aware of fingerprinting.
>>57287151
How can something be .41 bits of information?
>>57287664
the whole pointing system is a meme for scaremongering normies, the techniques used are real though
>>57287664
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(information_theory)
Step aside, /g/uys.
>>57286337
Can this be done with uMatrix?