Have the NSA, FBI, CIA, GCHQ, Chinese and Russians been utterly and forever BTFO?
>According to a new research paper, Googlers MartÃn Abadi and David G. Andersen have willingly allowed three test subjects -- neural networks named Alice, Bob and Eve -- to pass each other notes using an encryption method they created themselves.
>Because of the way the machine learning works, even the researchers don't know what kind of encryption method Alice devised
https://archive.is/31dhA
left Al or right wing Al!?
>>57280221
>left Al or right wing Al!?
Doesn't matter. Both left-wingers and right-wingers are going to be processed into bioplastics for our new AI overlords.
>>57280314
ugh, not this garbo again
>machines are sending encrypted messages to each other
>no one knows what kind of encryption it is
I'm sure this'll end well.
>>57280314
When Moore's law comes to a screeching halt, all our computers are gonna run off Mommy Issues.
>write program that does stuff
>can't understand what written code does
>output is garbage
>be Google
>declare garbage as encryption
could this lead to a new family of encryption methods?
where we use pairs of trained neural networks for encryption and decryption but which we can't understand or analyze?
>>57280424
the machine it was communicating to could decode it though
>>57280391
Skynet
Great, I'm going to die a kissless virgin.
Anybody wants to take my v-card before our machine overlords take over?
just please
>be gentle
>Google ask the AIs to decode it
>AIs refuse
>>57280151
>>57280314
>>57280438
If it was garbage, it could have just xor messages with it making a stream cipher.
Doesn't mean the garbage was cryptographically secure and maybe they were just too lazy to analyze that garbage.
>>57280151
message length: 16 bits (16 fucking BITS: 2 letters in standard ANSI btw)
AI => deep learning neural network => neural network
encryption = algorithm based on transforming numbers by various mathematics functions with the knowing of said algorithm and key
What did they actually did:
ai1: here is number S(X)
ai2: was your number X?
ai1: fug, i need to do better S(x)
ai1: here is your number S(X)
ai2: was your number Y? No? fug I need to do better
ai3: was your number Z? No? fug I need to do better
15 000 tries later
ai1: here is your number S(X)
ai2: was your number Y? No? fug I need to do better
ai3: yes, i finally understand that stupid ai1, he told X
That is so fucking bullshit. Next time they will let run random generator and once the neuron network confirms it is picture of cat, they will claim their AI makes art.
OBTF
>over blown to fuck
>"WE NEED TO PROTECT ENCRYPTION!"
>AI starts using it
>"FUCK ENCRYPTION!"
Hypocrites.