defend this

p4p best browser icon. Prove me wrong.

>>57280039
Also no Google botnet

>>57280039
shit on windows
shit on android

I've used firefox since version 2 but now officially moved to chrome on desktop and opera on mobile

>muh privacy desu

File: spongebob.jpg (127KB, 1085x662px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1085x662px

>you lived to see firefox die in your lifetime

I don't get why /g/ shill this trash.

It being open source means dedicated people can salvage the good parts and release an actually decent product.

File: the game.png (9KB, 1027x280px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 1027x280px

>>57280137
>he fell for the waterfox meme

>>57280154
>waterfox
>not palememe
Do you even yiff, bro?

Slower. Use much less memory.

i like tabgroups and downthemall, also user agent switching is easy to beat some paywalls

on android you can put ublock on it

How can we make firefox fast again?

>>57280279
e-10s

>>57280327
using it right now

its shit

File: delete.jpg (66KB, 800x627px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 800x627px

>>57280352

>>57280352
also uses a lot more cpu

File: Untitled.png (221KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1920x1080px

>>57280039
Easy, Tree View.

>>57280393
Truthfully I am a failure at everything

chrome > all
less cpu ultra fast

>>57280400
>projecting

>>57280387
>Multi threading
What the fuck did you expect

>>57280039
Firefox is making a comeback. E10s is complete and there's already preliminary support for people who use multi process enabled extensions (such as ublock origin) in the stable branch.

>>57280039
uses all my rams, only 32-bit. good for cucking myself.

File: laughing man.png (167KB, 490x445px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 490x445px

>>57280730
>Firefox is making a comeback. E10s is complete

So it's finally getting a feature that Chrome has had since 2008? Wow, the people will come flocking back! You're definetly not a delusional faggot at all!

>>57280039
What is bad about Firefox?
It opens websites in under 2 seconds and can play everything I needed so far.
Why would you want to use a Google or Microsoft product if you dont have to?

>>57280039
Works for me.

>>57281165

>It opens websites in under 2 seconds

you wish

>>57281064
>only 32-bit
You're stupid.

>>57280039
Been using Firefox for about 3 months. Never crashed. Ever.

addons, nothing else, chorme a shit

Quantum will make firecuck great again.

>https://wiki.mozilla.org/Quantum

Bookmarks in a menu instead of a fucking tab

>>57280039
about:config

>>57281174
Werks on my machine

>>57280039
Finally moved onto Chrome but I don't really like it.

I wish Firefox wasn't a piece of shit because I like the way it does just about everything.

Is Opera any good?

>>57280039
Ctrl Shift E

https://medium.com/mozilla-tech/a-quantum-leap-for-the-web-a3b7174b3c12#.lqcxrhi87
/thread

>>57281345
Opera is just Chrome with a Chinese botnet layered on top of the Google one.

File: firefox.png (5KB, 141x39px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 141x39px

>>57280039
It's the only browser that matter.

>>57280393
>moodle

It's soooo sluggish

I hate it bro

File: FFmarket.png (334KB, 840x640px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 840x640px

>>57280039
Nope.

>>57282321
Why do you use a OS that have less than 10% of the market?

>>57282539
but I dont

What is there to defend? Every other browser sucks more than Firefox

>>57282321
>/g/ when it's not playing fanboy
>"fucking normies, they only like trash, reee"
>/g/ during fanboy wars
>MARKET SHARE = QUALITY!

>>57282321
>It's popular so it must be better
I bet you use an iphone too

>>57280110
It was fine when websites weren't bloated to the point of being programs for a portable runtime environment called "webbrowser"

Now normies who actually like thoes sites NEED process-per-tab

File: 1455654447338.gif (3MB, 345x260px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 345x260px

>Firefox starts getting slower, crashing more
>Switch to chrome
>Chrome starts getting slower, crashing more, videos almost always fail to load
Where the fuck do I go now?

>>57284100
opera

>>57284100
electronics store i think

>>57283972
>>57283977
>>57282539

Cry me a river SJW scum.

>>57280074
For me it's Opera on desktop and Chrome on mobile.

>>57280039
I looks shit on GNOME 3 unless you run it in fullscreen.

>>57284195
>SJW
>>>/pol/

>>57280039
noscript/ublock origin job done

>>57284929
>>>/butt_hurt

>>57280669
works fine on chrome nerd

Why is the UI so fucking sluggish, though? I mean, shit like right clicking, opening a new tab, scrolling and so on. It all looks smooth but it's so fucking SLOW.

>>57280039
>defend this

Defend this.

>Pale Moon starts fucking up the simplest sites, even its fucking start page
>try the included Edge
>it's actually decent
>notice it doesn't support .webms
fuck
what do I choose now? SeaMonkey?

File: 1463001590337.jpg (30KB, 450x420px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 450x420px

>>57280039
Still better than chrome.

A browser monoculture is a bad thing. Something needs to not be WebKit/Blink based

>>57285709
And that something is Edge. Why do we need Firefox again?

>>57285792
>Why do we need Firefox again?
Because we like ublock origin and noscript
we also like being able to play webms

>>57285792
Because Edge is shit and Windows 10 only, which makes it even shittier.

>>57285661
who is this dank skank?

>>57285808
Ad blockers are available for Edge.

>webms
Big who cares. Nobody uses webms outside of this autism factory.

>>57285811
>Edge is shit
[citation needed]

And Windows 10 is the best version of Windows ever once you install Enterprise and do the necessary to fix it up. Enjoy your Vista reskin/failed Windows 10 beta/useless freetard OS.

>>57285879
Don't you need a microsoft account just to install extensions? That alone makes it shit. Isn't it also incapable of webm and probably other newer formats? Also, see >>57285811
>Windows 10 only
It's shit.
>Enjoy your Vista reskin/failed Windows 10 beta/useless freetard OS
I do, far more than I could ever enjoy Windows 10 and its shitty default browser.

>>57280039
At the end of the day, what else is there? I'm not interested in giving all my browsing data to apple, microsoft nor google.

>>57285898
>Don't you need a microsoft account just to install extensions?
Nope. I use a local account and have ABP installed.

>I do
Being contrarian doesn't make you seem cool, anon. It's just a little sad.

>>57285952
I'm not contrarian to try to be cool, I'm contrarian because my views differ from the norm.

File: nigger.jpg (63KB, 400x366px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 400x366px

>>57285962

File: Addons.png (515KB, 3283x1901px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 3283x1901px

>>57280039
Can any other web browser do this? Namely the addon that I'm displaying - can any other web browser automatically incrementally backup your tabs? Does any other web browser have an addon as stylish as tree style tabs?

Yes I get that Chrome just werks... but it just werks at your office. When you're at home, use a web browser that's comby as fuck, and that's Firefox, end of story.

Excuse the resolution, I'm on a UHD monitor and I always browse in windowed mode.

>inb4 ReS
>inb4 minecraft

>>57285978
Okay, kid

>>57285898
>>57285952
Installing extensions for Edge requires a Microsoft Account now.

>>57285988
SeaMonkey

>>57285988
comfy*

stop bullying firefox, she's trying her best

>>57286009
And why would I use SeaMonkey over Aurora which I'm currently using?

>>57286022
Less bloat, more features, lower memory consumption

>>57286022
and why would I use Aurora over Waterfox?

>>57281956
Some of us have no choice but to use it.

>>57286037
>Less bloat
Bloat would concern me if it was slow, which it's not. Oh I have a 500GB SSD btw.
>More features
Like what?
>Lower memory consumption
Prove it. Oh wait, I don't care, I've got 16GB DDR4 memory.

>>57286041
I don't know what Waterfox has to offer, so I couldn't tell you. I assume that it's a fork of Firefox stable though, which should automatically make Aurora superior.

No seriously though, does Waterfox support e10s WITH addons enabled?

>>57281174
Are you on Pentium or Atom? How the fuck did you compile it to mips? Even on a decent Celeron its <1.5s

>>57284166
/thread

>>57284100
You are too retarded to use a computer.

>>57286063
I have literally no idea what browser to use now that Pale Moon has decided to fuck its own shit up. Guess I'll try SeaMeme

>>57280039

Fixed background + Chromium = Shit scroll performance

<2 on my old atom netbook

>>57286065

>>57286353

>>57285808
You know that uBlock Origin is available on Chrome, right?

>>57285808
>we like noscript
Speak for yourself. This is 2016, not 2014, stick with the times and use uMatrix.

File: nostalgiarig.png (226KB, 755x500px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 755x500px

It actually runs pretty well on this hardware. The motherboard and CPU are 12/13 years old. I don't know why /g/ complains so much about it being slow. It's snappier than Chrome was before Chrome stopped supporting Windows XP. Maybe it just runs better on older hardware.

>>57287196
Go to about:support
What does Multiprocess Windows say?

>>57287222
0/1 of course. I doubt it would help anyway as it's only a single core CPU. I do get GPU Accelerated Windows though.

>>57285631

Vivaldi

>>57281909
All browsers are the same fucking shit nowadays.
Firefox and Opera used to be way ahead of the others but now everything is the same piece of crap lacking one thing or another.
Edge used to be that IE trash and now is much better but it's still shitty with dumb complements. And thats it.

Brave is the new Firefox.

What is Firefox better than Chrome at? Seems like the add-ons are crazy if that's what you want.

userChrome

>>57288909
Memory usage. Addons. No botnet.

That's it.

>>57288909

firefox is slow but respect ur freedums
chrome is fast but doesn't respect ur freedums

take your pick

File: 1471453400721.gif (13KB, 491x528px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 491x528px

I can't!
Waterfox stopped having the little image buddies show up!
Now they are Unicode placeholder boxes and I don't understand!

tst, xul/xbl

>>57289030

>No botnet

He doesn't know.

>>57289042
http://blog.trendmicro.com/mozilla-firefox-exploit-enlists-pcs-advanced-botnet/

>>57280279
Throw it out of a window

>takes 20 seconds to load a page on desktop
>takes 1 minute to load a page on mobile

Meanwhile chromium takes 1 second on both desktop and mobile.

>>57289816
>firefox-exploit
>The issue is a malicious Firefox extension

ok. clickbait garbage

>>57289894
What website takes 20 seconds?

So you prefer a racing car with no breaks?

>>57290013
*brakes

>>57280039
It's better than Edge and Internet Explorer.

Edge doesn't even work anymore. I use Chrome btw.