Which i7 is this shit? On Microsoft webpage just says i5 or i7.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/devices/surface-studio/tech-specs
If this computer has a 6500U will be just a beautiful trash.
>>57260579
Panos said it's a quad core i7, so it can't be 6500U, most probably a 6700HQ or 4720HQ.
i7 and i5 is a meaningless description in regards to mobile CPUs.
I used to believe it was like this in regards to mobile Intel CPUs.
i3: Dual core
i5: Dual core with hyperthreading
i7: Quad core
Until I learned how wrong I was.
mfw you get dual core i7
>>57262502
And the site says sixth gen quad
Skylake
>>57260579
>top GPU is 980M
>has 6K screen
>is expected to render 3D
yeah this thing is going to perform like hot trash
>>57263326
Default is 965M and is a 5K (4500 x 3000) with 16:10
Usual 5K is 5120 x 2880 (16:9)
Its a low hardware for 3000 USD.
>>57263361
The closest Cintiq alone costs 2800$ so it's not bad price. What makes it bad is being unupgradable so you have to throw the entire thing away when the hardware is obsolete.
>>57263377
3000 USD you can buy an iMac 27 and an iPad Pro with ApplePencil.
>>57263361
>5K (4500 x 3000) with 16:10
Just fucking do the math you retard, it's not 16:10 it's 3:2
>>57263426
>iMac
Wew lad
>>57260579
Can this replace my cintiq?
>>57263426
Do people seriously use iPad as drawing tool?
>>57263605
Yes
>>57263605
Its the best around, with the iPad Pro.
>>57263571
if its like surface then no the digitizer is nowhere near as accurate
>>57262502
Probably 6700HQ and 6820HQ
3000$ for a Desktop PC with mobile CPU and GPU.
inb4 hurr durr the display is expensive, that doesn't make this a less shitty product, they should have just released the fucking diplay on it's own.
>>57263685
>they should have just released the fucking diplay on it's own.
It's more than a display because also a digitizer
>>57260579
>only $3000
wacom on suicide watch
>>57263685
They want the apple people.
Maybe they'll later release the display for cheaper to get the wacom people.