What is the status of AMD proprietary drivers on GNU/Linux? Is it still bad?
I'm thinking of getting an AMD GPU for GPGPU performance (which is better than Nvidia's and doesn't have cucked double precision), so my only option are the proprietary drivers. And I want this to work on Linux.
>>57258839
use open source drivers
/thread
>>57258974
Open source drivers don't support GPGPU.
Won't work
New Xorg doesn't support flgrx etc.
Kernel module also unsupported afaik
The support has become much better I think, if I understand correctly at least.
The old proprietary driver, Catalyst (fglrx), is no longer recommended and effectively deprecated. Old and recent cards are well supported by the open-source driver, Radeon (xserver-xorg-video-radeon).
The very latest cards are supported by the new free driver AMDGPU (amdgpu), with the possible addition of the proprietary component AMDGPU-PRO (amdgpu-pro). This would probably be what you should research before buying your card: make sure that the model you choose has the feature you talk about, and that the Linux version of the AMDGPU(-PRO?) driver supports it.
>>57259071
I'm getting Nvidia then, thanks.
>>57259101
>The very latest cards are supported by the new free driver AMDGPU (amdgpu), with the possible addition of the proprietary component AMDGPU-PRO (amdgpu-pro). This would probably be what you should research before buying your card: make sure that the model you choose has the feature you talk about, and that the Linux version of the AMDGPU(-PRO?) driver supports it.
Does that support GPGPU?
>>57259126
I don't know, that's why I said that you should research that before buying. If it does, it could be on certain cards only. At least I provided you the pointer - I think that new free/proprietary driver might be your best bet, not fglrx or xserver-xorg-video-radeon (that I personally use for a fairly old GPU).
>>57259353
Thanks, I'll read about amdgpu.