RIP apple

>>57248984
>3000 burgers

>>57249059
its a good price for a premium machine

this isn't for faggot gaymers, its for art & design professionals

>>57248984
>mac mini with screen attached
>3000 dollars

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>57249079
its a really fucking nice screen though, nicer than anything apple has ever produced. feel free to prove me wrong

>>57249077
hahah oh no it is not

pros use a desktop like regular humans

>>57249094
Didn't say it wasn't.
But does it command the kind of premium real pro screen command, like the top of the line Eizos? I really don't think so.

>>57248984
but is it going to be good for /vidya/?

this looks gimmicky af

>>57249113
Learn to english.

>>57249108
t. a neet on 4chan

real professionals (i.e. not you) use a cintiq or an external wacom tablet. this blows both of those shits out of the water, and doesn't end up being that much more expensive

>>57249140
>hurr durr learn to english
the second command should be "have"

>>57249115
No.

>>57249113
it's got DCI-P3 (more or less HDR)
pixel count is actually a bit lower than a 5K iMac, but the screen is 3:2

>>57249108
Well you can use this machine for Photoshop.
> 3000 burgers
Are you poor?

>>57248984
My cintiq costs $2800 at work. So this seems like a good deal.

>980M
WTF?

>>57249206
yeah they should make a version that's the display only with additional connectors for the pen and camera. I'd even buy it at $3000. Much better than having a dated AIO in 4 years or a mediocre one now.

>>57249189
Yeah, I can get an Eizo (16:10 though) that does that for <1500 and then a <500 computer to connect it to.

>>57249094
It really isn't though. The current gen iMac has a 5K screen with the same color gamut as this.

>>57249231
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1102772-REG/eizo_cg318_4k_31_4k_4096x2160_ips_lcd.html
okay dude

>>57249231
okay but that would completely lack the functionality that is the purpose of this machine? being able to draw quickly, effectively and accurately

Looks really sleek, great for graphic design I assume

>>57249241
but does it have accurate touch capabilities? then sorry, the screen is nicer.

>>57248984
As a graphic designer it's definitely godlike and absolutely destroyed apple. But I don't know who else this is for aside from artists .

is tomorrow going to be the biggest shitposting on /g/ ever? with the apple event

>>57249231
>$6000 monitor
You forgot to add $2500 more for a cintiq

>>57249303
studios of all kinds. designers as well as artists. i could honestly see microsoft themselves using this device for their own productivity

>>57249308
yes because unless apple is planning something totally different than the rumours, it will be incredibly underwhelming

>>57249206
Also skylake and no pcie SSD or usb 3.1.
This thing's been sitting on the shelf for a while

>>57249332
Or they wanted to stay in the 3k range.

>>57249332
a kaby lake wouldn't make much difference for this machine anyway, the processing speed improvements aren't that impressive t b h and would just make the whole thing a lot more expensive

File: 1442696002411.jpg (116KB, 1112x794px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1112x794px

>>57248984
>980m

>>57249079
>Implying iMacs aren't just mac mini atached to a screen
Ayy lmao

>>57249303
Executives. The current process is often to print out a document, do a markup, scan it back in and email the the scan off to someone to implement the changes. This is a million times better.

Normies don't buy desktop computers let alone ones that aren't apple

>>57249404
iMacs actually have desktop components.

>>57248984
>w10
no i think apple will be just fine lmao

>>57249366
How would it make it more expensive?
You're just using a newer iteration of the same hardware.

$4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199
$4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199
$4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199
$4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199
$4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199 $4,199

>$2,999 does not get you i7 & GTX 980M

>>57249143
((((professionals)))) with jew money sure, but anybody "professional" i.e. actually getting paid for their work and not off daddy's money can easily get a cintiq or chinese knockoff for and a shitbox with a lot of RAM and be happy

>>57249469
>how would the newest processor which has barely begun rolling out make a computer more expensive?
are you retarded anon?

>>57249077

>it's not for faggot gamers
>it's for faggot artists and designers

ok

>>57248984
Was this just released?

>>57249206
Extreme gaymen on your "productivity" device

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/accessories/surface-mouse

WHY IS THIS ALLOWED?

>>57249485
This is a brand new flagship product line launched in 2017 why wouldn't have the latest processor?

>it's a retarded /g/ neets complain that a piece of technology is overpriced because it doesn't run their gaymes episode.

Back to /v/ you retarded manchildren.

>>57249524
Would by a wired version desu

>>57249549
Shit *buy

>>57249529
To keep the price down with a minimal performance hit?

File: 1476205577143.jpg (33KB, 582x600px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 582x600px

>>57249524
>no side buttons

>980M
kek they couldn't even put a regular 1060 there? more efficient and powerful

>>57248984
>965M and an i5
>In a $3000 machine
In case you were wondering, the model with an i7 and 980M is $4200

It's kind of crazy to think that the 5k iMac offers value for money when compared to this. In terms of specs the base 5k iMac is $1200 less and the only real differences between them is the iMac lacking the touch screen, but having a higher resolution and pixel density.

File: _.png (354KB, 626x683px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 626x683px

>>57249458

File: ht.jpg (161KB, 793x443px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 793x443px

>>57248984

File: 1475762470099.gif (1001KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

1001KB, 640x480px

>>57249505

File: 1475596475814.jpg (67KB, 413x395px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 413x395px

>>57249077
>professionals

>>57250126
>Ancient Draughtmen

>>57249878
The touch screen is the whole point of this pc though

>>57250168

t. GIMP pro

File: 1476256751823.gif (284KB, 108x147px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 108x147px

>>57249077
>muh art

>>57248984
Still runs Windows 10 though, which is a turd of an OS

File: Binford_B001.jpg (26KB, 595x227px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 595x227px

ITT:
>BUT BUT BUT BUT
>980M
>TOO EXPENSIVE
It's not for you. It's not for me.
It's for people who need a huge fucking screen with a precise digitizer.

Photoshop CS6 used to cost 700$ up to 1000$.
People who make a living out of this won't have issues in shelling out a few grand.

>>57249108
>pros use a desktop like regular humans
Regular humans use laptops.