>From:[email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Date: 2015-12-20 17:26
>Subject: Last night
>Hi John,
>I wanted to reach out to say thanks for the principled and nuanced stance the Secretary took last night on encryption and the tech sector.
>Leadership at Apple certainly noticed and I am sure that is true though out the Valley.
>Please know that Apple will continue its work with law enforcement.
>We share law enforcement's concerns about the threat to citizens and we work closely with authorities to comply with legal requests for data that have helped solve complex crimes. >Thousands of times every month, we give governments information about Apple customers and devices, in response to warrants and other forms of legal process.
>We have a team that responds to those requests 24 hours a day.
>Strong encryption does not eliminate Apple’s ability to give law enforcement meta-data or any of a number of other very useful categories of data.
>Tonight, Tim and Apple will be featured on "60 Minutes."
>We expect encryption and taxes to be covered.
>In previews, Tim reacts strongly to the EU tax investigation of Apple and other American companies.
>We will amplify encryption messaging tomorrow when we publicly release our comments on the draft UK Investigatory Powers bill.
>Best wishes to you and your family and the HRC family for a peaceful and joyous holiday season and a prosperous and bright 2016.
>Lisa
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/30593#efmAHtANd
>Company hands over information when pressed with a warrant
STOP THE FUCKING PRESSES
We already had 12 threads about this, you stupid /pol/ crossboarder. Fuck off and stop trying to incite off-topic threads.
>>57246348
>sheeple sending people to /pol/
Back to plebbit, sheeple.
>>57246308
Can we trust the chink botnet, /g/?
>>57246456
its okay lad I run 19 proxies every time I look at noods
>>57246951
But are you using your browser in incognito mode?
>>57246348
>company collects data in the first place
>>57248140
But your data is safe in Applel's hands, goy :^)
>>57248140
This is known. They just don't sell it.
>>57248290
So they give it away for free, then, goy?
>>57248334
If they are required to surrender it, yes.
>>57248345
And how exactly is that good?
>>57248374
no one said anything about it being good
>>57246308
>>57246408
>using the term sheeple
Are you 12? Can you not just say uninformed, you stupid son of a bitch.
Note how they dance around the fact that they still sure as hell won't weaken their encryption on their devices. iMessage data and data stored on your phone/mac is still safe. The 60 Minutes that's mentioned, if you had watched it, really emphasized that fact.
This is just a canned corporate response that we already knew everything about.
Typed from my Arch Linux™ laptop.
>>57248374
They give it out only in criminal cases, as opposed to being their business model to sell it.
>>57248566
They are informed, yet refuse to believe the facts.
Thus, they are nothing but simple sheeple, waiting to be sheared.
>>57248685
The irony is thick in this post.
>>57248685
At that point you tell them they have rose tinted goggles, you cringy fuck.
>>57248667
Even if some things are "safe" on your device, iCloud has been proven very easy to hack.
>>57248719
>>57248772
>easy
you're acting like a fucking middle schooler who watches too many movies.
There has been one big hack from one exploit, and nothing since.