GPU-Z Thread? GPU-Z Thread.

>>57235327
WHAT IF I DON'T WANT TOO?

File: gpuz.jpg (97KB, 408x503px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 408x503px

eh fuck it

>>57235327
I politely refuse.

>>57235327
Is that the graphics card that comes in laptops? Namely T460 or T460p.

How is it? Any good?

File: gtx970.png (18KB, 386x487px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 386x487px

>>57235327
>>57235638
Bowdown fuckers

File: 980.gif (28KB, 400x494px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 400x494px

+96 core
+500 vram
Reference cooler is loud as shit

File: 1070.png (33KB, 398x495px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 398x495px

>>57235676
get on your knees and suck this fat cock

File: gpu-z.png (31KB, 386x487px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 386x487px

>>57235327
sup fellow clevo user?

File: Gtx9700.png (18KB, 386x487px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 386x487px

>>57235708
This party aint over yet im coming for you.

File: 980 2.gif (15KB, 400x494px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 400x494px

>>57235708
>>57235676

>x70 series
>paying money for defective ASICs

>>57235665
LOL no that's an old flagship Fermi furnace card. The one in the T460p is the 940MX

File: gtx3.5.png (252KB, 1456x739px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1456x739px

>>57235752
>paying money for defective ASICs
WARP 10 MR. SULU!

>>57235708
https://www.techpowerup.com/227133/evga-gtx-1070-1080-overheating-issues-company-says-thermal-pads-a-solution

File: 1501.png (45KB, 829x528px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 829x528px

>>57235817

max 1501mhz at 1.243 volts
reference hairdryer detonates my eardrums while gaming

>JUST

>>57235752

How's that Directx12 working for you?

File: GTX970TOTHEWALL.png (18KB, 386x487px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 386x487px

>>57235886
>my fan doesn't kick in until 60c, and NEVER breaches 75C with minimal fan noise and speed.
EVGA GTX 970 SC

File: ss+(2016-10-20+at+03.49.41).png (51KB, 781x480px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 781x480px

Anyone here with a better ASIC than this?

>>57235857
I've already taken mine apart
Plus the vrm barely gets hot

File: BEEP BEEP!.gif (23KB, 400x494px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 400x494px

Outta way, coming through!

File: gpu.png (30KB, 386x487px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 386x487px

>>57235942
Fucked if I'm installing it to take a screenshot, but the GTX 570 I keep around as a backup has an ASIC over 90%.

Bought a 980 Ti Classified on the cheap yesterday. Haven't really pushed it yet, but it boosts to 1500MHz on stock voltage with a small 50MHz bump.

>>57236017
Don't expect too much more than at most +75mhz on the core. Even with LN2 BIOS enabled, unchained power target and temperature link, +200mv, and +46% increased power target threshold, the card won't go above 1560mhz on boost for me. Has to do with the card hitting anything above 71C. The gtx9xx series has it set that once you go above that temp, the card will fall out of boost. Only way to get around that is better cooling. I.e. liquid.

I can get +50mhz core and +675mhz memory though at a measly +50mv.

File: 20150714_235556.jpg (2MB, 2322x4128px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2322x4128px

>>57235939
But was yours only $250 new in-store?

File: Intel GMA Arrandale Pentium.gif (25KB, 400x493px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x493px

>2016
>not having 872 petabytes/second of memory bandwidth

File: g1 gaming 980ti asic.png (54KB, 768x485px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 768x485px

Got fucked on asic quality

File: Untitled.png (58KB, 797x561px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 797x561px

Do I win the meme contest?
I got it for 350€ and strapped a pressure optimized 120mm noctua industrial on it to keep it aroudn 73 C. Keeps at 1000MHz without any issues

>>57236169
>that memory

>>57236235
What fury? Fury X? Air cooled fury? I had a sapphire nitro Fury on release. Immense problems. Ram wouldn't downclock at idle. Artifacts at idle desktop over HDMI. Random DP falling out.

Sucked because I really liked it. Was a good performer when it actually worked. Any major problems? Was considering another Sapphire fury nitro now that the card and driver's has matured a bit.

>>57236264
It's a Nano.
It was a good deal when I got it, since cheapest 1070 go for around 460-470€ and fury lineup is around 500€.

File: ss+(2016-08-30+at+08.38.30).jpg (115KB, 523x700px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 523x700px

>>57236264
>>57236287
Also rx 480 and gtx 1060 were made of unobtanium for the first 2-3 months here and between the 280-480€ gap it was a really good deal ( 30% off )

Here is an image of the settings, although poewr limit is at 50% now since some games caused power draw spikes and thus slight clock fluctuation.

File: Untitled.png (68KB, 773x488px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 773x488px

Dat ASIC quality

File: 1474588653824-fit.jpg (7KB, 249x249px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 249x249px

>>57236287
That's not terrible. My local microcenter has sapphire fury cards for $250 new. Nanos for $310 last I saw.

>TFW a Fury X was returned to microcenter because a single fan started squeaking
>TFW that card, normally $550 was marked down to $300 because it was considered "defective"
>TFW it was also Saturday so all returned items are on clearance. 35% off all returned items
>TFW a working fury X was selling for $195 while I was at work and couldn't get it

I was so sad the whole day.

>>57235676
You can't bow down to a manlet with meme card, kiddo.

File: wef.png (53KB, 767x485px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 767x485px

To OC or not to OC?

>>57236371

Damn that sucks, last july microcenter listed the 980 for $230 online while I was at work and the only store that would price match them when I got off was office depot, it took like a month to ship

>>57236371
>>My local microcenter has sapphire fury cards for $250 new. Nanos for $310 last I saw.
Yeah but don't you 'murricans have prices before taxes? We have taxes included in the price so my nano was 282€ before the VAT

>TFW a working fury X was selling for $195 while I was at work and couldn't get it
Man that sucks, depending on when the local stores put another sale for the nano/fury x I might buy another one for crossfire if I feel the need. Otherwise I'll just wait for the Vega or what comes next.

>>57236429
Push it to the limit bruh, that there is equal to 1070 OC when pushed far enough.

>>57236082
I'm pretty happy with it even like this desu. It destroys the 1060 even at 2.1GHz and I paid less for this than I did for that. Don't mind buying used with EVGA, since their warranty transfers to subsequent owners.

File: 4db.jpg (49KB, 600x910px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 600x910px

>>57236407
>meme card
See:>>57235939
Memes my fucking ass

>>57236830
All the core clock in the world won't make that gimped half a gig of VRAM any faster, my memester.

File: charles_chaplin.jpg (118KB, 700x609px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 700x609px

>>57236914
Pretty much.

File: GreatScott.png (572KB, 1893x825px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 1893x825px

>>57236914
>make that gimped half a gig of VRAM any faster

>>57237078
I don't think you quite understand the problem, anon.

>they fell for the 3.5 meme
Posting my 980 Ti after I finish eating.

File: gpu2.png (53KB, 767x479px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 767x479px

Boosts up to 1600mhz

File: gtx260.jpg (79KB, 375x445px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 375x445px

no bully pls

File: gpuz.png (20KB, 386x489px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 386x489px

Oh shit niggers.

>>57237464
>reference clocks

For what purpose?

>>57237377
>windows xp
>not in a virtual machine
Dude ... can you even linux ?

>>57236235
So you took the original one out, or strapped one on top of the other?

File: Capture.png (15KB, 385x488px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 385x488px

>>57235327
what a fantastic thread

truly what we need

>>57237499
Cooling is shit in my case

>>57237732
You can afford a 980ti but not a decent case?

>>57237753
Not when I bought it, and I'm too lazy to upgrade.

>>57237377
nice jpg 6/5

>>57237732
Overclocking without adding voltage produces almost no extra heat. Unless you're thermal throttling even at stock, you have no excuse.