Linguistically Creative Intelligence

File: 13557807_257968064571123_2179077787715562196_n.jpg (32KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 960x540px

(cont.)

That's done. I've got 150 possible unit identifications for narremes (probably more than 300+ in existence, if we started looking academically now we might hit that number before I die), contained in a way that would allow a machine to access a translated world and interpret it for conversation/debate with a human.

Natomics provides the data set by which a modern learning machine can "comprehend" common language and understand the world-via-language. It requires a self modifiable field (like microsoft's current fpga project) to host abstracts loosely understood as a possible hierarchical series of linguistic prompts, opening the possibility of thinking about THINGS instead of words. But I'm not going to get into it much further here.

If you think this is more than nonsense (or think it IS an want to explain why), join me tonight on the discord server and I'll be happy to explain the nitty gritty details, from narreme translation to the process by which useful creativity is procedurally generated. I'll be on all night.

~Lain

p.s. I'm not a programmer, it's why I'm here. I'm a language specialist with a unit and system of analysis that allows a machine to interact with language in the same image-based-manner humans do, with enough systems knowledge to know how to put it into practice. But with no connections or local talent to get it going.

Sorry to clog up your board, link below:

>discordapp.com/invite/baFZyhs

fuck you, I'm not clicking on some shitty botnet link just so I can listen to your grand ideas

If you want to discuss it, discuss it in this thread

>>57222946
this

forum format is much better for understanding information

File: 14264886_1797960600475274_1827931726962495139_n.jpg (12KB, 337x395px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 337x395px

>>57222946
Well what would you like to know?

The unit to track is called a narreme, it's defined as a "change in world state", and can be classified by the authorial manipulation as seen in the glossary pastebin.com/YGJYsVU8

So to translate any document for a machine you would perform a translation into natomic form then embed the natomic translation back into the original text and feed it through learning algorithms as you would normally think to do with words, but now with encoded intent and contextual relations.

Use it with a hosted environment of "known knowledge" and you could have such a machine compare the contents of a document to its preconceived notions of the relations involved in the document.

What would you like to know?

>>57222983
I disagree, but that's because I've taught natomics over forum before (4chandata.org/lit/Here039s-a-new-thread-for-the-ongoing-semiotics-discussion-focusing-on-narramemes-Old-thread-https--warosu-org-lit-thread-5253469p-a733683) and it's a bitch and a half. You really want a more directly interactive medium.

Previous discussions have focused on the literary aspects. It's very rare for me to get a chance to talk about the technological applications with someone capable of progressive input so that's why I'm here cluttering up /g/ instead.

>>57223097
>The unit to track is called a narreme
I disagree strongly. It's

var foobar = foobar