With the whole Note 7 Galaxy explosion debacle, do you think

>>57212555
I'd say yes but I'm not retarded.

samsung is too huge and diversified to file for bankruptcy because one of their tech toys failed.

they'll rebrand their entire mobile line and move on. The Samsung Galaxy name is toxic now

>>57212555
No.

File: samsung machines time bombs.jpg (184KB, 1052x946px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 1052x946px

>>57212555
pretty much.

even their washing machines are garbage.

also, there's this..

http://www.theverge.com/2016/10/19/13333386/samsung-galaxy-note-7-gta-mod-youtube-takedown

>>57212555
No you fucking idiot. And it isn't like the note was sire to explode on your face.Only ~30 phones exploded out of the millions that were sold.

File: laughing cunts.jpg (46KB, 600x369px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 600x369px

>>57212670
>BUTTMAD SMASHILL GOT TRIGGERED
they recalled them, retard. they even banned them from planes and other public transportation. it's the only phone in the world that will cost you a $180,000 fine and possible federal prison.

File: android-robot1.jpg (42KB, 650x625px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 650x625px

>>57212555
Samsung could just stop making phones and tablets all together and it wouldn't hurt them that bad. They will still sell a fuckton of TVs and SSDs. Samsung is not limited to smart devices or even computer parts alone. They make everything from military vehicles to medical equipment. All that said, good goddamn riddance to their shitty exynos chips, laggy Android skins, locked bootloaders, and meme navigation keys.

>>57212670
oh? Well I'm gonna go buy myself one then!