What do you think about Node.js?
>>57170495
Can be great for small and personal projects for 8 year-old programming noobs but this can't be considered as serious. It's the php of 2010+ with javascript api.
However my girlfriend paid her studies by making php websites and she earned in 2005 more than $800/month, that was quite a lot!
Now she will rarely get $100/month for the same amount of work because web development is now taught in high schools all over the world and pajeet work for less than $0.50/hour...
It runs on spacesuits, so i guess its ok
>>57170954
Whahahaha! Europeans are the new Pajeets!
Damn they crashed their shit on Mars and don't admit it.
>>57170947
>It's the php of 2010+
As in: running applications that are actually used by the masses?
It's easy to hate, but until you've made something that is being used on a daily basis by a large group of users you're just a hobbyist.
>>57170976
So Europeans developed a Spacesuit running with Node.js? Thanks for letting me know this
V8 is cool, we use it and node is pretty cool.
JS is not as bad as one might think although we'd enjoy stronger typing....
Frontend Developers with no admin/ops background write shitty backend code though :)
Shit's good, try it
>>57171013
No hate jut the true reality, web development is already a nightmare and it's known that debugging and maintaining javascript is irrelevant.
>>57171029
No! Not really! Bah it's hard to say because I don't use spacesuits.
However they paid students to develop some "gadget" things for spacesuits.
>>57171044
Being cool doesn't mean it's good.
You know some really bad things were considered as cool the last century.
>>57171044
>we'd enjoy stronger typing
just use typescript
>>57171062
>debugging and maintaining javascript is irrelevant.
As opposed to?
The language doesn't determine if you write bad code or not.
>>57171067
Typescript is a solution but you will never get native support in traditional and embedded or headless browsers. I think angular2 and ecmascript6 just killed it to be used as a real solution.
>>57171087
Maybe you need some more years of daily development experience. ;)
>>57171090
>you will never get native support
So?
Nobody but the biggest noobs run their scripts directly in the browser anymore, you always pass it through some kind of compiler.
>>57171098
Just answer my question: which language ensures code all code is always easy to maintain?
Just name one...I'm waiting.
>>57171149
java
>>57171154
HA
HA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Pajeet, please.
>>57171164
That was a simply EPIC meme anon, haha, xD! It was actually SOOOO good that i laffed hard!!! lol i think i actually laffed so hard i peed a little heheheeheh xDDDD :o
>>57171179
Go poo in loo faggot.
>>57171149
COBOL
>>57171210
XDDDDDDDD
EPIC
> hurrdurr php lul
You mean like Facebook and WordPress??
I've been messing with it a lot lately.
It's pretty decent, but you really have to ask yourself why you aren't using a different language than JS.
Node is ok with Typescript otherwise its tumblr does coding with pajeet
>>57170495
its not that bad but the way its used is cancerous
example: https://www.etcher.io/
https://hyper.is/
im not into the "le bloat meme" but this shit is painful to see
also npm is the worst package manager i have ever seen
it literally never works
even if i compile it from source
Well, it's better than vbscript
webscale
>>57171939
facebook uses Hack my friend. And wordpress is bloated, slow, and unsecure -- much like php
>>57171062
Node.JS isn`t web.
>>57170495
Very good
I have already switched my shell and core utils to nodejs based alternatives
>>57170495
i think it's a js with nodes
good for smaller projects.
>>57171149
Python.
>>57170947
>11 years later my girlfriend makes 1200 dollars a year
>>57170495
It shouldn't exist, Python is better.
>>57174196
>faggot syntax
>copying code from the internet requires you to reformat the spaces/tabbing
>fake threading
no
>>57171149
golang
>>57174304
>I can't copy answers from stackoverflow as easily
thank you for confirming the stereotype, nodefag
>fake threading
just like node.js
>>57174304
>Subjective
>Literally when does that ever happen
>If performance mattered and you needed multiple threads for whatever you're doing, you wouldn't be using Python OR Node.JS