>>57170418
jesus why is that other screenshot at like a 60 degree angle?
>>57170418
this likely means they are storing the password as either encrypted text or plaintext instead of a secure one-way hash.
>>57170434
because op is a faggot.
>>57170500
No?
>>57170566
if they were storing a hash then their database would have fixed sized fields for the size of the hash output, and the input size wouldnt matter.
But what is probably happening here is that the users password is being padded out to 32 characters and then stored in a 32 character long field.
>>57170418
Can't believe some people still defend this shit company, lel
>>57170598
they could also just be thinking that every user-controllable input has to be truncated to some small number of characters. I'm sure there's chucklefucks that try to paste in a megabyte of text into the fields.
>>57170418
what's the point of having a 32 letter password? above 16 it will only get hacked, if either you fuck up or the company