Pure Sex.

>>57159164
>chopping your dick of and waiting for it to regrow 10 cm more to the front.

>>57159164
Pure unemployment

>>57159164
Ever tried with a woman?

>>57159698
no

functional programming is better

Can confirm. Using Haskell is like getting fucked.
My asshole still hurts.

>>57159164
If it's so good, why is nobody using it?

>>57159955
>>57159185

What is a more applicable FP language then

Also, haskell is the better language to learn FP right

>>57160339
Javascript

File: 1474578948501.jpg (120KB, 392x495px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 392x495px

>learn Haskell and write a few programs in it
>writing programs in another language is much worse than it used to be because I know what I'm missing now

T-thanks /g/.

>>57161234
How so?

>>57161660

Not that guy, but I was trying to make a propositional logic proof assistant in C. I wasted weeks just figuring out how to parse fucking strings and manipulate trees of arbitrary length.

Doing the same thing in Haskell, I finished it in about a day.

File: ocaml2.jpg (73KB, 446x500px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 446x500px

>>57159164
Impure Sex.

>>57159164

Surely, you mean referentially transparent sex.

>>57159164
funny how Haskell has a RealWorld type when that's the one place you won't find Haskell

>>57159185
>>57159955
t. code monkey

>>57159776
>>57159955


holy shit, muh sides

oh, those hasklels, will they ever learn?

>>57159164
I guess its alright if all you do is advanced fizzbuzzing

>>57159955

Number of reasons.

1. Most programmers are Pajeet-level codemonkeys

2. Most companies have a lot of legacy code that they don't want to have to pay to redo

3. FP is hard to learn.

>>57159164
No side effects = pure masturbation