Predict your PC specs in 10 years.

16c/32t
128GiB ram
8TB SSD storage
60TB hard drive storage

>>57156595
One screen
One terabit link
Power is not a concern as long as you're near a supply spot, having a start button or wires neither is

File: 380ED.jpg (44KB, 560x315px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 560x315px

166mhz Pentium MMX
48mb of ram
2.1gb hdd
1mb vram
2 hours battery life

its gone for nearly 20 years now, im sure it will last 10 more

>>57156595
16GiB RAM
AMD 8320
AMD 380x
20TiB Storage for all my porn.

>>57156622
T H I C C
H
I
C
C

>>57156595
used workstation with
>dual 8-core chips
>32-64GB RAM
>stock midrange or low-end Quadro
>1-2 SSDs and a couple 4-8TB disks

>>57156595
Whatever specs are necessary to play vidya at 8k resolution/144 fps with max settings

Since I'm not a consumerist whore I'll probably have what most people have now, and have paid next-to nothing for it.

>>57156692
>1-2 SSD's
are you nuts, more likely 10 of them

>>57156595
Some system that's considered "high-end" now.

>>57156595
>portable
i7-2620m
16 GiB RAM
1TiB mSATA SSD
1TiB SSD (Ultrabay, for a 2nd OS)
4 TiB HDD
1600x900 Alienware screen (Matte)

>desktop
Some kind of dual Xeon setup with 20 TiB of storage and 6 monitors

>>57156595
>Amd A36 16c32t zen 3 uarch APU
>256gb ddr5
>Radeon R99 integrated
>Pci ex x32 5.0 ssd

>>57156595
Hundred core 9GHZ 2TB RAM

99% CPU and 1.5TB with two tabs in Firefox.

>>57156595
Budget laptops will have core i7 and Titan X and a 4k display

High-end computer will be implented in the brain to get a full immersion of the porn experience

File: laughing.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>PC

Hey anon, what is that thing you have over there? a PC? Lol anon that's so 2016, use an iPhone 17 like us!

The odds are in 10 years people will have a single device the size of a phone that has the performance of a good desktop today. I think tech will slow in advancement and move to becoming significantly smaller

>>57156848
It will also probably move to cloud based shit. Fuck cloud based shit, im staying with my shit laptop

File: Speccy2.png (52KB, 763x604px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 763x604px

>>57156595
Basically the same shit I have now but with a new GPU, whatever is hot shit in 1 or 2 years. Also, some new storage and probably running some Linux distro.

>>57156595
Considering I'm already using a decade old computer, I don't think it will be much higher.

>>57156595

> 2048 cores at 512 teraherz
> 4 petabytes octodatarate4 RAM @2 teraherz
> 12 video cards with 32 GPUs each, 1 petabyte octodatarate7 hologram RAM
> liquid helium cooling system
> 128 kilowatt PSU
> 12 x 512 petabyte SSDs in RAID 10
> 24 foot 31:7 display 6 gorillion pixels 4d holographic
> 45 + 12+ 3 interdimensional speaker system
> borg implants user interface

You know, pretty shittty base system handed down from my mommy to run wondoze79, play crawlla dooty and shitpost on 4chinnz. I'll make sure to shitpost on /g/ for wat upgrades i need for epeen benchmarks and boss speccy posts

Intel i5 35570k @ 3.4GHz (8c/8t)
256GiB DDR7 RAM (16666mHz)
10TB SSD (2TB for system, 8TB for frequently used data)
100TB HDD RAID array (long-term storage)
AMVidia GTX 1580x

>>57156946
>greentexting in 2026

Wow what a cis.

>>57156848
>The odds are in 10 years people will have a single device the size of a phone that has the performance of a good desktop today. I think tech will slow in advancement and move to becoming significantly smaller
Electronic engineer here.

No. Scaling ended this year. The free ride is over, we can't make the chips any smaller.

File: fetch.png (12KB, 624x267px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 624x267px

>>57156595
same as now if it does not break. might get a higher res screen some day though.

>>57157051
Electronic engineer here.

No. They said that 20 years ago: "WAAAAAAAAAH WE'LL NEVER BREAK THE NANOMETER BARRIER, GATE WILL BE SO FUCKING THIN ELECTRONS WILL PASS THROUGH". They said that 10 years ago: "WAAAAAAAAAH WE'LL NEVER BREAK THE 50 NANOMETER BARRIER, GATE WILL BE SO FUCKING THIN ELECTRONS WILL PASS THROUGH".

Where are we now?

>>57157119
7nm, but this time we can actually see the effects of quantum tunneling. There's a limit, and we're getting close

>>57157119
>WE'LL NEVER BREAK THE NANOMETER BARRIER
>Where are we now?

We're at 10nm gate WIDTH and you're dreaming about "breaking the nanometer barrier" when we're down to about 6 atoms for the gate thickness (1nm or so?) and have exhausted all the exotic materials we could use to make it thicker.

It's over. We've squeezed as much as we can out of planar processes. Cooling is hard enough now, when you go into three dimensions you're going to compound the problem by a factor of about 1.8x-2x.

The only thing we can do from this point is work on self-assembly, but that's a chemist's job and 30 years away.

File: 1476163976283.jpg (5KB, 219x230px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 219x230px

friendly reminder that all Intel chips past 2009 are and will be botnet

enjoy your botnet

>>57157150
>the nanometer barrier

Starts at 0.99999 micrometer. Beyond that, it's the picometer barrier.

File: me_on_the_center.jpg (73KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 640x426px

>>57157179
>mfw i type this on my Longsoon Lemote 60GH ultraportable laptop with 16 mips cores@2500TFLOPS each, Elbrus WLIW co-processor and GPU, 128 GiB of DDR5 RAM and 2TB M.4 SSD
feelsfreeasinfreedom.man

>>57156595

>reading /g/ at work
>boss walks in

thanks, faggot

File: SiBpWuI.png (218KB, 1680x1030px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1680x1030px

>>57157243
>not using werk tyme mode on 4chan x

>>57156827
>triggered

someone post a non censored pick of the OP images?

File: 1400846775793.png (158KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 200x200px

>>57156595
I'm using an upgraded Thinkpad T420 + eGPU as main computer and sandy bridge a best so i'd guess the same specs but with more storage.

>i7 2720QM
>16GB RAM
>1TB mSATA SSD
>2x 4TB HDDs
>1600x900 screen or the FHD screen mod if it becomes available to buy again
>Whatever GPU exists at that time.

File: tfw10101.jpg (37KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 633x758px

same as i have now
celeron 520/2gb ram for laptop
xeon e5-2670v3/16GiB RAM for workstation/home server

>>57156595
Op's image was removed. Probably because that chick needed to wipe her ass.

Anyway,
>16 core CPU at approx 5GHz
>64gb ram
>8tb ssd
>60tb hdd

>>57156595
in 10 years?
>CPU: consumer up to date i7 with 4 cores and 8 threads
>RAM: CORSAIR DOMINATRIX 32GB
>MoBo: MSI Gaming 420 X
>GPU: nVidia Titan Y
>PSU: Corsair SX 1000
>Case: Corsair Fractal Design R7

>i7-16700k
>GTX 2080 Ti
>128GB DDR6 RAM
>8TB SSD
>250TB HDD
>32K monitor
>Soundcard with 128-bit audio
>10000 Mbps ethernet
>Windows 12

>>57157243
why would you do that? do you browse gay porn sites there too?

I don't know what hdd I'll have, but I know I'll still have an i3-550

>>57157857
This sounds somewhat legit to me. I'll go with this config as well.

>>57157857
>Windows 12
>now with neural botnet and thought ads

>i7 10700K
>GTX 1880
>256Gb ram
>42:1 monitor 440hz g+f sync
>year of the linux OS

Zen++
amd rx 880
64gb of ram

>>57156595
Used x99 board
Used in i7 5960
Used gtx in 1180ti
1tb ssd 2tb hgst hdd
Recycled cooler master case
Used 3200mhz ddr4

All for less than $1000

>>57157150

Anyone else excited about the prospect of having massive computers to get more power out of them? We'll all have entire rooms in our houses taken up because of the demands of Crysis 6 and we've already hit the maximum transistor density that is possible with classical physics.

I think all that needs to happen is the speed of internet needs to increase in terms of ping mostly. If we all had 100% fibre optic cables connected to each other our computers could be connected to each other as much as it is connected to itself. We wouldn't need the extra processing power in our own homes if we could outsource it. Though it would take a massive effort of standardization to make it efficient, I do think it's the future of computing

>>57156595
Intel Core i9-8600 16Core/64T @ 4.8 GHz / 0.55 V
256 GB RAM (4 x 64 GB DDR6-6400)
16 TB NVMe v3 SSD, 64 TB MLC storage SSD
8K Screen @ 120 Hz
Nvidia X1900 64 GB HBMv4 12288 Shader @ 3.5 GHz / 0.45 V

>>57160763
This is meant as a enthusiast station like my current one, I think the consumer ones will have 8 Cores then

>>57156848
>same tech we have today
>everything is a f2p/subscription service
>tiny little hand held device that cant do anything meaningful

the only way to stop this dark future is world war 3.

screenfetch

>3-4nm manufacture process

>pentium g9800, 4c 4t, 30w tdp, on par with oc'd 6700k, 80$
>i3 xx100, 6c 12t, 35w tdp, 30% faster than 2016 fastest i7, 140$
>i5 xx600k, 12c 24t, 45w tdp, 300$
>i7 xx700k, 12c 48t, 60w tdp, 550$

>Gtx 1560, 3ghz, 12gb hbm4 memory, 45w tdp, 20-30% faster than current titan, 250$
>Gtx1580 36gb, 75w tdp, 750$

>32-128gb of ddr6,

>Ssd rules majority of market, cheap high capacity 4tb+ drives, hdds used only by hipsters

>Mid-high tier pc (solid i5 and gtx xx70) can play anything at 8k/144

>Amd/intel integrated graphics on par with 2016s high end cards (fury/1070)
>Amd as always slower and less efficient, but much cheaper

>Everything moving towards efficiency, no need going past 250w psu for intermediate-high tier rig

>Sli/cf completely dead

All assuming we don't die in hillary's Great Atomic Fire

>>57156799
>PCI-E 5.0
No nigga 4.0 will be here in 10 years. Mores law will reach it's end with silicone.

>>57156605
>Hard Drive
>In 10 years
>He doesn't know that we are at a critical physical point with HDDs
Kek