>$600 USD is excessive for a flagship when did /g/ get flooded

>>57143134

prove youre not a poorfag

>People spend money on unnecessary features because they're new.

Yea well me too, i got the lg g5, and cant really find a way to hate it

>>57143134
because it'd be EOL within 2 years from initial release, unless it's an iphone then it's kinda worth the money as it'd be updated the longest, and they have overinflated used prices so you can get around 40% of what you paid back.

>>57143134
>poorshits
only poorshits buy overpriced electronics.

the entire definition of consumer electronics is planned obsolescence.

>>57143134
wasting money is now how you become rich

>>57143134
it is if you are talking about phones. making the phone does not cost even half of that.

>>57143223
Trying to decipher this amalgamation. Are you saying iPhones ARE worth the money because they're maintained?

If so, you should realize their software updates are designed for the newest models and after a couple years, the older versions function poorly (on the new updates) and eventually stop receiving new OS updates. Apple intentionally does the opposite of what you suggested. It's their business model (planned obsolescence).

Chinkphones have depreciated flagships by undercutting them.

Why pay the premium for a ""flagship"" device when a $300 phone has the same specs.