http://videocardz.com/63832/nvidia- announces-geforce-gtx-10

>1050ti equivalent to a 970
>Has 2-4gb of vram
>Will come with some stupid cripping issue jsut like the 970
lerl

>>57127240
>>57115788
>>57077486
>>>/v/355071220
>>>/v/354993972

5 rupees, etc.

File: EVGA-GeForce-GTX-1050-Ti.jpg (252KB, 1290x1172px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 1290x1172px

>WAH, WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO ON THE MOTHERBOARD

>>57127445
>BUTTMAD AYYMDPOORFAGS DETECTED

if its on par with the 470 and ends up being cheaper then AMD is literally finished, otherwise no one will give a shit except ppl who are in poverty

>>57127449
[pomfs internally]

How does it compare with the 470?

How long until you can buy a 4k capable card for $3-400?

>>57127478
Thanks Pajeet you have truly understood our board culture and I will buy many Nvidia products now!
#TheWayIt'sMeantToBePlayed

>>57127867

Depends on what you mean bycapable, but probably 3-4 years to get a card with that money that can do a steady 60fps at 4k.

>>57127485
It's on par with the 460 and AMD already dropped the price on the 470 so it is only like $15 more expensive than the 1050 while being significantly faster.

Huh.

How's this in comparison with a 280x? I really need a fucking upgrade here and I'm tired of AMD to be honest

>>57127269
>equivalent to a 970
No. Thats 1060. 1050ti is bit stronger than 960.

>>57127971
I was getting 30fps on my RX 470 by accident on AC Syndicate

>>57127867
define 4k capable, just able to run your OS at a 4k resolution? plenty of cards from multiple gens ago can do that. I personally would not consider a card 4k gaming capable running at any less than 100hz

>>57127867
One or two more generations. The 1080 can do 4K at medium/high fine. The next itteration of generation will put the 1080 level to $300-400 price. The iteration replacing the 1080 tier will be similar to Titan X, which can do 4K high-max fine.

The iteration after the iteration will get Titan X like performance down to $300-400

>>57127240
>barely better to even worse than a 950
right into the trash it goes

>>57127994

You'd be looking at a pretty marginal improvement with an upgrade like that.
Just go with the 1060 or the 1070 if you want to upgrade, otherwise it's a waste of money.

>>57128073
but it has a higher number and a green logo on it, goyim, buy it due to your unreasonable brand loyalty!

>>57127240
memes aside, this isn't some incredible powerhouse but it's nice to have a card that just plugs straight into the motherboard with no extra connectors

that's why the 750Ti was so great, it was a decent entry level card and you could just throw it into a shitty prebuilt with zero effort

>>57128211
Yeah, connecting one or two plugs one time when you build your system is really hard.

>>57127240

I'd seriously expect these lower end cards to be passively cooled by default nowadays.
Do they really need fans? I doubt it.

>>57128222
shitty prebuilts often come with shitty power supplies. Plugging an extra pci connector into the card isn't hard, but changing out the entire power supply is a way bigger deal

>>57128008
isn't 1060 equivalent to 980?
the laptop 1060 is equivalent to 970

>>57128347
An overclocked 1060 beats a stock 980, but you can get another 30-35% performance out of a 980 by overclocking, at which point it batters the 1060.

>>57128347

>the laptop 1060 is equivalent to 970

There's no difference between laptop and desktop cards nowadays.

>>57127240
didn't AMD have something like this 3-4 for years ago?
I don't remember it working out that well.

>>57128404
>AMD
>Drivers that don't break and are easy to use

I wonder why it didn't work out.

>>57128386
the laptop 1060 has a larger performance gap(like 16% from what I remember) between the desktop one compared to 1080 or 1070(both under 10%)

http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1050

IT'S HAPPENING

>>57128277
Then just get a Molex or SATA power to PCI-E power connecter adapter if your PSU for some insane reason doesn't have PCIE power connectors.

File: 04G-P4-6251-KR_XL_4.jpg (131KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 1200x1200px

http://www.evga.com/articles/01063/evga-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-and-1050/

>WAH, WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO ON THE MOTHERBOARD?

This may sound dumb, but I'm currently running an AMD HD5870 and I'm in seruious need of an upgrade. Would the 1050Ti give me a decent performance improvement for the money?

>>57128525
Yes, but you'll have to wait for reviews to see if you get what you want out of it

>>57128525
A lot dude, 1050ti performance it's a between gtx 960-970

>>57128550
No it isn't, you fucking shill. Current leaks put it on par with a 960 at best. Even Nvidia's marketing slide from the link in the OP giving information for the regular 1050 only puts that on par with a 950, so there's no chance the Ti is going to be closing on a 970.

>>57128550
Its around 960 level, not 970. Maybe 10% better than 960(which you can already get with OC).

970 is literally 30% better on stock, and can get to up 40-50% with OC.

Don't inflate the performance.

>>57127269
>2-4GB VRAM
>2GB VRAM

Why even fucking bother?

>>57127240
Shut the Fuck up

You people truly are beyond saving.

This isn't a normal card, it's an ULV card you can use to upgrade office pcs/for the home pc. You shouldn't compare such a card to a 960 or whatever that Indian company makes.

File: performance_per_$.png (13KB, 498x305px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 498x305px

are you believe it will be valuable ?

>>57128687
What?

>no price listed
>talks about price/performance

File: 2016-10-18 15.37.40.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

What is this /g/?

>>57128677
So which is it? Are you inbred or merely lobotomized?

File: Screenshot_2016-10-18-09-40-05.png (691KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

691KB, 1440x2560px

Jesus Christ the shills are out in force... Or should I say...nForce.

Yeaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh.....

>>57127240
>insert GTX 1050
>cuck a button

You can't make this shit up.

Would a 1050ti make a reasonable upgrade to a 750ti?

I only have my card for 2 years or so.

>>57128722
Fallout computer.

Apparently it's made on Samsung 14nm instead of Nvidia's usual TSMC.

Wait for overclocking results.

>>57128875
Standard OC equipment should probably also include a fire extinguisher because of that.

>>57128807
Yes, also it has HEVC Main10/Main12 hardware decoding & VP9 hardware decoding, DisplayPort 1.4 support, HDMI 2.0b support which GTX 750 Ti doesn't support

>>57128900
ha ha le epic may may

Unless they release a low-profile version, no one cares.

Same for the AMD equivalent cards.

File: 777.jpg (295KB, 946x798px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 946x798px

>>57127240

>hurr power supply is hard!!!

I swear its like they dont want customers or something if no one knows how to install a PSU then no one can build so they wil not buy your cards you jackasses

>>57129149
Have you actually researched Samsung/GF 14nm vs TSMC 16nm.

TSMC definitely comes out on top.

>>57129212
>Needing to factor in replacing a PSU just becuase you wanted a new GPU

Not everyone is so retarded they buy a new PSU every year anon.

>>57129227
Ua some of us buy one that can do more voltage than we need so upgrades later go smoothly

>>57129217
The Samsung 14nm process glofo is using is a revision from all the garbage that was samsungs original 14nm process.

>>57128386
Pretty much same chips/architecture/specs, but desktop cards can clock higher due to better cooling and power availability.

>>57129025

Spotted the shill.

>>57127449
>>57127553
I fucking hate this website.

>>57130333
you're here forever

>>57129025
So does the rx 460

>>57130588
LOL NO, please don't show your ignorance in an Nvidia only thread

RX 460 does not support 8K HEVC Main12 hardware decoding

>>57130333
trips of truth.
however you are tied to this place forever.
"We're marooned on a thread, in an endless shitposting sea.
Confined to a tiny spit of boards, unable to escape"

>>57127240
so the power of a 770~960?

>>57127445
Holy shit, it's not even subtle.

>toppest lelkek will never kill himself

>2016
>falling for AMD's shiesty marketing tactics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04ITA1_XoqM

>>57134146
>2016
>getting trolled by RepsUp100

fucking newfags when will they learn

>>57128347
1060 is around a beefy 970 stock, comes very close to the stock 980 and in a few instances in dx11 matches it. maybe two to three games its like 2-5fps faster due to stronger tessellation performance and maxwell gimping (gimping in the form of waiting two - three patches to give maxwell performance improvements while pascal has higher priority.)

1060 3gb is pretty much a 970 give or take in dx11 with the same identical vram gimping and fewer cuda cores compared to the 6gb 1060.

so no, the 1050ti will not be as fast as a 970. it be between a 960 and a 970 with the 1050 plain being an updated 960.

dx12 overall all becomes shit.

File: NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-1050-Performance.jpg (181KB, 1200x656px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1200x656px

>>57134466
>so no, the 1050ti will not be as fast as a 970. it be between a 960 and a 970 with the 1050 plain being an updated 960

No it won't, you dumb faggot. Nvidia have already released their own (no doubt exaggerated) performance numbers for the regular 1050 and it's way off the 960. The Ti will be around the same performance as a 960 at best. There is no in-between a 960 and 970. Stop repeating this fucking shilling.

I literally just ordered a RX 460 three days ago. Did I fuck up?

>>57134544
>68fps in dota
Isn't that really poor since dota is meant to run on toasters?

>>57128375
The 980's average OC is only 18%

Source: http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_gtx_980/

>tfw bought a 950

>>57134688
Does it matter though? People who buy a 1050 aren't going to have an expensive monitor that runs 1440p or 60+hz.

>>57134544
What card will I need to get if I want to play dota 2 on a 1080p 144hz monitor?

Can the 960 do ultra at 30fps?

>same perf as a 770 i got years ago for $150
Why should I care?

>>57134544
Why the fuck are they comparing it to a 650?

>>57134544
>60fps in gta v
unless its med to low settings, this is complete bullshit

>>57136810
Not necessarily, I have a gtx 670 and I run gta 5 on a mix of mostly high and medium settings above 60 fps, plus there's probably a lot of architectural improvements from my Kepler gpu to newer pascal. If they're running all around medium it's possible.

File: 20161018175430_1.jpg (1MB, 2880x1800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2880x1800px

>>57137064
I couldnt imagine gta v looking worse than this on my machine.

gtx 1070 and I get 60fps constantly. btw, stay away from nvidia pcss and amd chs, they look worse and have terrible draw distance

File: never_ever_electric_boogaloo.jpg (623KB, 1280x1629px) Image search: [Google]

623KB, 1280x1629px

I would bite but i need a low profile card so I'm stuck at 750ti until the end

>>57137124
Softer-4-lyfe

Contact Hardening Shadows look best, but fuck does it kill FPS even on AMD card.

>>57136810
Well the image clearly says it's running at medium settings, though considering it's also an open-world game I wonder what CPU/Memory setup they had going for their test bench.

>>57127260
>>57127240
>thinks people will sell their rx460s for a 1050 ti
>lol

>>57134610
no

>>57134544
>"we will destroy amd with this $120 graphics card amrite goys?"
>68 fps on dota and wow
hahahahahah u cant make this shit up

>>57136112
Because it's too close to the performance of a 950