http://videocardz.com/63820/exclusi ve-nvidia-geforce-gtx-10

This cheap? Why is that? Are they weak as fuck or something?

>>354993972
>buying sub $/€200 cards
lol

>>354993972
lel will be worthless after 2 years I take it?

>>354993972
>Videocardz

Not this place again...

File: 1475158943811.gif (311KB, 200x242px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 200x242px

>moving out soon
>want to build little brother a computer so we can still play games together
>strapped for cash
>1050 coming out

I mean I'll obviously be getting the Ti because why the fuck not when it's only 30 bucks more. Who cares when it'll be obsolete because I wont be the one using it

File: 1472318880919.jpg (419KB, 1280x850px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 1280x850px

FUUUCK FUCK FUCK WHY DID I BUY A FUCKING GTX 980 FUCK YOU NVIDIA

>>354994578
Enough for any game at 4K resolution, but maybe not for 120 FPS on max settings on the most demanding games

>still selling 2GB cards in 2016
>identical thread on /g/
>>>/g/57115788
jesus christ at least make your shilling less obvious.

With half the cores of a 1060 it's going to be GTX 960 tier performance. Simply not worth the money when you can get a RX 470 for $30-$40 more.
Should drop the price of the RX 460 though.

>>354996228
this is half the performance of a 980

>>354994578

That goes for every card.

>>354996480
>b-buy muh 470
Not worth the money when the 1060 exists.

>>354996560
GTX 1060 is 30% more expensive than a 470 but only 20-25% faster and the 470 isn't even selling at MSRP yet. If 470 was selling at MSRP it would completely blow the 1060 out of the water in terms of price/performance.

Neither are worth it because RX 480 has even higher performance/$

>>354996954
Are you stupid or what?

GTX 1060 is faster than RX 480, period

Nvidia fastest in DX11, DX12 and VR

AYYMD POO IN THE LOO

>>354996954
>if only
>just wait
>it will be one day!

>Neither are worth it because RX 480 has even higher performance/$
So a card that's slower and costs the same somehow has better price/performance?

>>354996954
Unless you live outside the US, in which case it costs more than a 1060 because amd lol

>>354997114

Still cheaper though.

>>354993972
Where does a 1050 Ti sit relative to the 970 and 960?
I don't tend to follow up on poorfag tier cards, but I am assuming that the 1050/1050 Ti are somehow worthy of general interest?

How many FPS will this get me in overwatch and what settings?

>>354997894
GTX 1050 Ti is around GTX 960 performance with 75W TDP, no external PCIe power connector required vs 120W for GTX 960

It's for those that don't want to spend more than $139 or $109 but need a card fast enough for entry level gaming.

>>354997894
950

File: ayy.png (108KB, 504x350px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 504x350px

>play at 1680x1050
>getting a 1050

lel

Reminder than nvidia is cheaper literally everywhere except America. A fucking rx 480 8gb STOCK is more expensive than a gtx 1060 6gb aftermarket. Fucking amd can't do anything right. Where's my $50 equivalent price gap they promised??

>inb4 tax
If nvidia can keep their prices low then amd can. Amd isn't some fucking corner shop, it's a global brand.

Why do nvidia is always fucking their buyers? I recently bought a 960 and it's already obsolete. Fuck you nvidia.

>>354997894
GTX1070=GTX980
GTX1060=GTX979
GTX1050Ti=GTX960
GTX1050=GTX950

>>354997894
The 1050 ti is between a 960 and 970. It may even be able to reach 970 tier performance based on early overclocking results. It overclocks like a beast.

I bought a 660 ti like two years ago because I was desperate and my old grafics was fucked. How much of an improvement would this be?

>>354998196
'no'

In terms of performance

1070 = 980 ti
1060 = 980
1050 ti = 960/970
1050 = 960

>>354998196
Err no, you are wrong

GTX 1070 = GTX 980 Ti performance
GTX 1060 = GTX 980 performance

>>354998145
You should have known that going in though. EVERYONE said the 960 was underpowered with its 128-bit bus. That card was literally a 950 Ti.

Also, if you got a 2GB version then HA.

So, is it time to replace my 7850?

>>354998117
The reason for 480 prices is that you can earn money with them by cryptomining. Cryptominers are buying them all up instead of gamers.

>>354998472
>>354998504
>GTX1060=GTX980
If only.

>>354993972
>implying it wouldn't be piece of shit cards
>buying worthless half assed underpowered cards which are expensive vs how badly they perform

Don't buy anything less than gtx 1060 6gb from nvidia or you will cry in a half year why you can't play anything new at 60fps.

Will this be good for playing games at 1080p60fps medium-high settings?

>>354998525
2gb indeed. Research shown no difference in 2gb model to 4gb.
The card could not benefit for the extra 2gb.

>>354998615

If they keep gimping drivers, yeah.

>>354998196
>>354998472
>>354998504

1080 = 980 SLI
1070 = 980 Ti
1060 6GB = 980
1060 3GB = 970
1050Ti = 960
1050 = 950

I use a 750 TI that's overclocked.

So I guess I'll be upgrading soon.

>>354998584
it is you faggot, but only if you buy 6gb version, 3gb is worthless and shouldn't be even released

>>354993972
Would the 1050ti be a good upgrade from the 960?

>>354998382
Assuming 1050TI is on or slightly under par of a 970

probably worth it assuming it stays at 140 dollars (which i doubt seeing the price trends of the new pascal cards)

>>354993972
>tfw it will run faster than my GTX 780 which has almost 2000 cuda cores
why they do this to me?

>>354998145
Are you legit stupid? The 960 was a MOBA card and not really designed to play AAA titles like the 1060 is. They even advertised it as a 4k MOBA card.

http://www.polygon.com/2015/1/22/7868903/nvidia-geforce-gtx-960-launch-date-moba-league-of-legends

http://www.pcgamesn.com/league-of-legends/nvidia-want-moba-players-to-buy-a-gtx-960

File: nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-1920x1080-performance.png (93KB, 650x852px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 650x852px

>>354998584
Have you actually seen the benchmarks? Obviously not

http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060

>>354998615
no it won't, save money to buy gtx 1060 6gb or not buy anything at all, gtx 1050+1050ti are underpowered garbage like rx 460

>>354998643
That card could hit 30fps and high/very high textures in a lot of games. With 2GB, you're stuck at low or medium.

60fps is out of the question anyway, no matter how much VRAM you have.

>>354998117
That's not the case in my country. 480 8GB is 100$ cheaper than 1060 6GB.

File: perfrel_1920_1080.png (42KB, 500x1170px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 500x1170px

>>354998584

>>354998549
This isn't a worthwhile upgrade over a 7850. Only 30-40% more fps, so if you are playing a game at 40fps now you won't even get 60fps with a 1050ti.

>>354994191
Yeah but still stronger than ps4

File: camgirls room.jpg (322KB, 1365x712px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 1365x712px

>>354998852
>we are 1%

so according to the specs

1050ti = 2.2tflops at stock boost
1050 = 1.8tflops at stock boost

considering they both have gpu boost 3.0, you could probably bet (depending on cooling) +200mhz from the stock boosts which brings them in line with 2.9tf and 2.4tf

so the 1050ti is more in line with the 970 probably in terms of performance, and 1050 in line with the 960

that also fits in with nvidia's whole

1070 = titan x/980ti
1060 = 980
1050ti = 970
1050 = 960

schtick

>>354998658
Stop making these retarded posts. The 1060 3gb is still way faster than a 970. It's even faster than a 480 in many games. A 470 is more like 970 tier performance and the 1060 3gb trashes the 470.

Also speaking of which, my 750 TI was carrying me pretty well until Deus Ex Mankind Divided

I'll do anything to get that game running at a better performance, fuck

75w? Nice. Need a new card for my HTPC.

The 730 it has is getting old.

>>354998615
Older games: Yes
Current/new/future: No

Just get a 1060 6gb.

>>354998852
>release day benchmark
They intentionally held back Maxwell drivers to make the Pascal look better in benchmarks. They always do that when new graphics cards are coming out.
These days the 980 is faster in virtually every benchmark and also overclocks better

>>354998986
>carrying me pretty well until Deus Ex Mankind Divided

even on gtx 1060 6gb it was running like shit, but only because game is just straight non efford port from consoles, you need newest i5/i7 oced to play it at 60fps which is a fucking joke, won't even bother pirating next deux ex

>>354998817
Yeah. pretty much this.
I was in the US 3 months ago and had 220 for a card. I tried to find something better, but coulnt find any. Also: What happened to all retail stores in the US? The only place i found gfx cards in Orlando was in a best buy.

>>354998963
Benchmarks put the 1050 Ti at around 960 levels before any overclocking. I doubt even the best overlock will allow it to reach 970 levels. Especially with that 128-bit bus.

>>354994191
>code ends with 50
Gee, I wonder if they are weak?

>>354998884
Even 750ti is stronger than ps4.

>>354998963
1050ti is at best 60% of the performance of a 1060.
You only need to check current benchmarks to see where that will put it.
Hint: It's very near a GTX 960

GTX 1050 Ti won't reach GTX 970 performance

It's GTX 960-ish performance without external PCIe power connector and 75W max vs 120W on GTX 960

>>354997114
In DOOM DX12 a 480 is somewhere between a 1060 and 1070
In Battlefield 1 it's above 1060

conclusion - in games stuck with DX11 a 480 is equal or slightly slower than a 1060.
In DX12, it shits in 1060's throat

>>354999175
nice meme

>>354999115
>overclocking

are you retarded, im talking about gpu boost 3.0

the card will automatically boost to a thermal or power limit

for instance, my 1070 boosts to 1950mhz easy peasy with ZERO overclock (the advertised max speed is 1733mhz)

depending on the card's power delivery and thermals, these could very very well boost up to 2ghz on stock settings

>>354994578
Literally every computer part ever

>>354999282
But he's right.

>>354999074
No. It's neck and neck with the 980. Sometimes the 980 has a 2/3 fps lead and sometimes the 1060 does.

Maxwell overclocks better because of the mature process node it was built on. These are the first cards on the 16nm process node and the process isn't as refined or as mature as the 28nm node maxwell was designed around. The next nvidia/amd cards that will be built on the 16nm/14nm process will have a much better IPC than what they have now. Rumor even has it than amd are releasing a 4xx series refresh based on the 14nm process being more mature, so they can lower power targets and boost clocks slightly.

>>354999383
that's a way lower overclock than what Maxwell could do.
face it. It's at best equivalent to a GTX 960.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (481KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 1920x1080px

>>354999282
>ITS JUST A MEME GAISE I SWER IT

>>354999496
No, 750ti had Ps4 comparable performances only with some random nitpicked games, and now even Eurogamer dropped that retarded trolling shit.

>>354999278
It really doesn't. There is barely a 1% difference between the 1060 and 480 on dx12 when looking at over 200 dx12 benchmarks from difference websites

>>354999658
its not an overclock at fucking all you retard, its stock operating clocks under gpu boost

you can raise the power and thermal limits and overclock the cards normally well past 2.3+ghz

im just saying dont take nvidia's advertised clocks as those are worst case scenario clocks on the absolute worst boards, stock boost clocks on a good board with be at least 200/300mhz higher than the advertised max boost clocks

its like you are willfully ignorant about pascal's differences compared to maxwell

>>354997991

I have a 960.
So definitely not worth buying?

>>354999724
>only with some random nitpicked games
By which you mean literally the vast majority of modern games?
The few games where it doesn't outperform the PS4 (or at least perform on par) are
>Battlefront (which has changed with Battlefield 1, which the 750 ti can easily run at 900p high settings at 60 FPS)
>DOOM
>MKX
>Mafia 3
>Rise of the Womb Raider
In just about every other game the 750 ti either outperforms the PS4 or performs on par, even when paired with an i3 processor.

File: 3579486756453.jpg (10KB, 237x212px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 237x212px

>>354994375
>he has to play games on ultra even though the difference between high and ultra is a few useless effects that make no difference but tank your framerate

File: 1475155743546.jpg (17KB, 316x239px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 316x239px

>want a gaming pc equivalent to ps4
>have to pay at least $330 excluding os

Fucking pc meme, I can get a ps4 on craigslist for $220

>>354999440

>he hasn't heard of tahiti and hawaii

Christ in some DX12 titles hawaii is fighting against fat maxwell.

>>354999729
http://wccftech.com/rx-480-gtx-1060-dx12-vulkan-tested/
DOOM at 23fps lead on 480

>>354998117
It's because of bitmining.

>>354994191
Is it better than my 970?

>>355000002
In fact, now that I look, even Mafia 3 runs comparably on a 750 Ti, despite being a garbage port.
>>355000000

i may get one to replace my 380, i'm fucking done with amd's bullshit

>>354999108
We use the Internet to buy things because it is cheaper and easier than driving a couple hours to the nearest frys unless you want to get ripped off and go to best buy.

>>355000110
synthetic benchmarks arent games you retard

you cant play a game of ashes or doom, they literally dont exist

File: e28c147c2772bd05e9f618cb8d5af374.png (78KB, 847x489px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 847x489px

>>355000110
>still making retarded posts

https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/4tyco0/the_truth_about_480_vs_1060/

>On average, a 1060 is 13.72% better than a 480.
>On average, when using DX11, a 1060 is 15.25% better than a 480.
>On average, when using DX12, a 1060 is 1.02% worse than a 480.
>On average, when using Vulkan, a 1060 is 27.13% better than a 480.
>AMD won in 11.36% of DX11 titles, 71.43% of DX12 titles, and 50% of Vulkan titles.
>The most commonly reviewed games were AotS, Hitman, RotTR, the Division, GTA V, and the Witcher 3.

educate yourself on why amd has big gains on vulkan compared to nvidia.

>inb4 reddit
at least some of the people on there have a fucking brain on this matter

>>355000260
Yea, I'll likely be dropping my 280x for a 1070 soon.
AMD has a habit of being late with driver releases for new games.
>>355000314
>you cant play a game of ashes or doom
You're a dumb nigger.

How big of an increase would this be from a 750?

>>355000260
Why would you buy a 380?

>>355000415

i don't play new games, crimson is just dogshit and i'm sick of all the issues

>>355000492

why not, it was a good price and my previous card was on the way out

>>355000474
If the 1060 is anything to go by, I predict that the 1050 Ti will be near a 970 in terms of performance and a 1050 will be on par with a 960.
>>355000496
Still bugs me that the Crimson driver broke the reflections in Killing Floor 2 almost a year ago and AMD still hasn't done anything about it.

>>355000074
>current year
>not pirating OS

Should I go to for the 1050 Ti, if i have a AMD 7770 Sapphire? Everything online says it would be a good upgrade, but yall are making me second guess myself.

>>355000386

>at least some of the people on there have a fucking brain on this matter

They do, they just don't post on /r/nvidia or /r/amd.

File: 1476387024736.png (382KB, 680x462px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 680x462px

>>355000650
>still $330 without os

>>354999928
For you, you'll get a bigger upgrade from a GTX 1060 6GB or waiting for next-gen Nvidia Volta GPUs, GTX 1050 Ti is either similar performance or slightly better than your GTX 960

>>355000612

I can't believe the 1060 so handily beats the 970

Are these new cards really all that and a bag of chips?

>>354993972
Will it be 3.5 memes again?

File: 1476726127678.jpg (102KB, 1387x749px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1387x749px

>>355000415
tell me, whos the main character of "ashes"?
you cant, because you literally cant play a game that doesnt exist

tell me, whats the main plot and characters of "doom 2016"?
you cant, because you literally cant play a game that doesnt exist

>he actually thinks synthetic benchmarks are games

ahh yes, everyone knows game of the year 2016 is SiSoft Sandra 2016

story of the year goes to 3d mark time spy

graphics of the year goes to doom vulkan

gameplay of the year goes to 7z multithreaded test

sound design of the year goes to ashes

>>354993972
if im building a new pc in the coming months, should i get a 960 or a 1050?
Dont really wanna go massive on the money, but still wasnt good quality gaming

>>354999925
1050ti will reach the same boost clocks as the 1060. If you multiply 1060 benchmark scores by 0.6 you end up with GTX 960 scores. It's as simple as that.

>>355000584
When did you get it and for how much?

>>354999716
whats the cheapest ps4 equivalent?

File: cos_3840.png (188KB, 548x629px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 548x629px

>>355000584
You would have done better with a 280x.
Beats the 380 in pretty much every game and even beats or performs on par with the 380x in quite a few.

>>355000925

feb, 155 usd

I don't get why a 1050ti exist when you can just get a 1060.

That is probably how you end up with a 1080 though.

>>355000892
This is some horrible fucking bait.

>>355001037

too much heat/noise for the 280x, i don't play anything very new so i shoot for power consumption and noise over a few extra frames in shit i don't play

>30 dollars more for 2 extra gigs
Something smells fishy here...

>>355000892
I can understand that you can't play DOOM with your 1060. Not very well anyway.
Don't worry, optimizations are coming ;)

>>355001145
Well the 280x in terms of raw power is still stronger, so even in older games it outperforms the 380.
In fact, it outperforms it even more in older games compared to newer games.

>>355000496
What issues are you having?

>>355001150
are you too blind to notice the 20% boost to cuda core count?

A friend of mine is willing to sell me his 970 for 180. I'd be able to SLI two 970s this way. Is it worth it?

I have a 750ti but wanna upgrade. What card should I get? I don't care about VR or 4K gaming but I want max settings at 1080p/60fps for current games.

>>355001270

you apparently missed what i said, read it again

>>355001278

crimson being shit

>>355001168
>thinks i own a 1060

bitch, i own a 1080 and get 150+ fps in the doom 2016 synthetic benchmark

i then promptly deleted the fucking thing because 60gb for a synthetic benchmark is just asking too fucking much

went back to playing dota

280X = 250W of heat dumped into your room

It's a HOUSEFIRE, you don't want 250W of heat dumped into your room

>>355001390
180 is a decent price i guess but sli is a meme. dual gpu is fucking dead and most recent games don't even support it. just look at mafia 3 and gears 4.

>>355000998
Probably still the 750 ti

>>355001494
The 280x isn't that hot actually, my XFX DD 280x load temp is ~74-78C.

>>354993972

>Posting Dota 2, Overwatch and fucking Wow on this pic
>Games known to run on any onboard video card / toasters

>>355001508

Fuck. Apparently DX12 has VRAM stacking possibility in an SLI setup, but I haven't heard too much about that. Really that's what I was hoping for.

>>355001474
at least your previous post was somewhat entertaining
D- for an attempt at humor

>>355000386
t. nvidia fanboy

>>355001615

my 380 barely breaks 60c

>>354994191
Yes
>>354994578
It's already worthless
>>354997114
>1060 faster than 480
No, 480 is more powerful.

File: gtx950.jpg (33KB, 711x182px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 711x182px

I'm genuinely curious to see how much of an improvement the 1050 is over my 950. I see that it's still 2GB vram, which is kinda sad.

Not that I'm in a particular need to buy one. There aren't any new games that I'm interested in and my GTX950 plays Dark Souls 3 at solid 60fps with no drops on high settings already.

I got my 950 last black friday, almost a year ago.

Deal worth it if all I have is a GTX 770 right now?

>>355000198
Doubtful, the 1060 is the rough 970 equivalent (with something like 15% better performance)

>>354996228

Good question given how much that card costs now relative to others.

>>355001662
that's a feature of dx12 but it's not a thing where every dx12 game automatically supports it. devs have to actually code that into the game just like the do with sli now. it's a meme and not worth it.

>>355001662
only in theory. In practice no developer actually utilizes this functionality and even if they did, the savings are minimal because each individual cards still needs all the data to render the scene.

File: 1415755599885.jpg (19KB, 500x465px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 500x465px

>>355001763
>corrects blatant lies with actual objective facts with sources and proof
>n-nvidia f-fanboy

stay mad son.

>>354999729
>looking at over 200 dx12 benchmarks
there are less than 20 dx12 games, anon

>>355001898
Thanks anon, thinking about getting a 980ti, what's the 10 equilivent right now?

>>354994375
>1050 Gaming ++XX(SSAASSC) Champion Edition $299
It has RGB and ist mein butt brand.

>>355001852
No. 1050ti should be almost exactly as fast as a 770

>>355001997
>>355002068

Well damn. I guess SLI'd 970s really isn't worth it huh.

>>355002135
stay mad, shill

>>355002152
>looking at over 200 dx12 benchmarks from difference websites

ie looking at 200 benchmarks of the same games from several different websites to create an unbiased average.

lrn2read

So I have a 750Ti, waiting to upgrade, with this coming out, would it be better to get this or wait for the third party models to come out? I'm probably gonna wait for the ASUS or EVGA model but if I can buy the card soon, would the 1050Ti be good?

File: 1430980813601.jpg (17KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 480x360px

>>355002241
see >>355000386

>On average, when using DX12, a 1060 is 1.02% worse than a 480.
>1 (one) percent
>480 is more expensive too

you can't make this shit up. stay assblasted.

This would be better than my GTX 760?

>>354999074
Where does one get updated benchmarks?

>>355002502
much better

>>355002592
there are no "updated benchmarks". he's making shit up.

>>354996480
>muh shittier gpu you should give muhNvidia more money
GTX 950 is only 20% behind the GTX 960
Same with the 1050 and 1060.
>muh Vram
Why the fuck do you even need Vram? You already got 32GB DDR4. Pure autism.

File: 1462714622492.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>355002241

File: IMG_4740.png (427KB, 809x455px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 809x455px

Why would you buy this when a 1060 is $220

It's not worthwhile

To people unsure about the 1050 Ti's performance:

>Early benchmarks show 960 performance
>Nvidia wouldn't sell a 970-beater for $150 when the 1060 is $200 to $250 for 980 performance
>Nvidia would never undercut AMD for the same performance (RX 470 has 970 performance)
>This card has 768 cores, which is less than even the 960
>Even at 2+ GHz, it's only around 2.5 tflops

It's a 960 4GB for less money and power. Calm down, it's decent but not amazing.

>>355002702
>Why the fuck do you even need Vram?

Guys, watch out, we got the Nvidia CEO posting round here

Would a sli of 1050ti be better than a 1080?

File: 1461090171933.jpg (529KB, 1340x1588px) Image search: [Google]

529KB, 1340x1588px

Reminder that AMD fans actually defend this.

>there are people itt who were retarded enough to buy a 390/x over a 290/x which is cheaper and has the exact same performance

>>355001530
No. I have a 750ti, i7 @4.0Ghz, 16gb RAM and overwatch looks like shit compared to the PS4 version.

You can't really compare to consoles because of hardware optimizations

File: urself.jpg (33KB, 203x195px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 203x195px

>bought a 770 2GB for $400
I wish I could go back in time and not be fucking retarded

>>355003083
GTX 1050 will not support SLI just like GTX 1060 does not support SLI

SLI is only available on GTX 1070, GTX 1080, TITAN X Pascal & upcoming GTX 1080 Ti

>>354998884
why does it matter if its stronger than ps4?
does it mean I can play yakuza 0 on it when it comes out?

no, it doesnt.

>>355003083

Not for gaming.

>>355003180
I see, thanks. I guess it'll be a 1080then !

>>354998959
why is that balloon there?

>>355002813
Most of the overclockable ones, or the ones with good coolers are 250-270+, so it's a serious consideration if you have a tight budget. Most 1050ti's will prob be in the 170-180 range anyway.

>>355003157
this is why you wait a bit for the price to drop before you buy any gpu, whether it be nvidia or amd. my friend bought an msi r9 390 for £320 on the week of release and i nearly bought one myself but i waited out for a few days and there was a deal on a gtx 980 for the exact same price. i got like 25% extra performance for the same price as a 390 on release. pretty good deal.

the gtx 770 is still a good 1080p card though.

Let's say you would have to decide on buying a graphics card SOLELY based on the numbers. I don't mean benchmarks and whatnot. I mean numbers like RAM or number of transistors or clock speed etc.
Which numbers would determine the power of the GPU?

>>355002857
>970-beater
Easy, just get a 4GB card

>>355003157
i did the same thing anon, only it lasted me a good 3 years for modern gaming... so im not even mad

considering it was already a year old card when it came out

a 4 year old chip still performing well to this day is something to be happy about, the only modern game i couldnt really play was doom 2k16, but that game is gimped on everything but the newest shit anyway

tfw paid CAD 939.99 for my msi gtx 1080

>>355003426
this is retarded because each gpu has a different architecture. nvidia gpu have less cores than amd equivalent but always surpass them. the same goes for shit like memory compression. nvidia has invested alot into memory and color (bandwidth) compression hence why a gtx 1070 has the same theoretical bandwidth as a rx 480 but due to color compression techniques it doesn't bottleneck. same with memory compression eg in rise of the tomb raider the gtx 1060 on ultra uses about ~3/4gb vram whereas an rx 480 uses over 6.5gb in the same scenario.

it's apples to oranges.

>>355003502
are you claiming the 970 doesn't have a full 4gb worth of vram chips on the pcb? got any pics for me?

File: GPUIndex.png (170KB, 914x1227px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 914x1227px

>>355002592
>>355002671
Even TPU's newest review shows the stock 1060 being slower than the stock 980 unlike >>354998852. Not sure if they actually rerun benchmarks or if it's just a different selection of games.

PCGH.de is pretty good at this. They regularly update their performance index. Their benchmark index shows 980 > 1060, too.

>>355002174

1070? probably

>>355003426
Teraflops, with a 1.4 multiplier to Nvidia

>>355003926
>gtx 1060 3gb is 2.2% faster than rx 480 8gb currently across all games
>gtx 1060 6gb 12.3% faster than rx 480 8gb currently across all games

and people still recommend the 480? absolute fucking delusion

So is it gonna beat out a 480 or no

>>355004352
their game selection is very Nvidia favored. No DX12 games and they still use Skyrim.

>>355004638
>it's all a conspiracy

like clockwork

I really hope we get a decent price drop on the 1070 in a year

I really wanna play Star Citizen and I'm also really cheap

File: 1476677746354.jpg (299KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

299KB, 1080x720px

is it time for me to upgrade from 780 TI yet?

>>355005120
GTX 1080 Ti or wait for Volta

>>354993972
>1050ti 4gb

And yet their fucking lower end 1060 has 3 fucking gb. Fucking nvidia.

File: It's_a_mystery.png (81KB, 976x375px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 976x375px

>>355005206

oh god what did I do wrong

please no bully

nvidia fun 「this is trash card. lets buy gtx1070 or more better」

>>355005120
as long as you can play your games at good settings and a nice fps you're fine.

>>355003389
she ran out of condoms.

>>355003093

>what is the 770

At least the 390x has higher core clocks and more (and faster) memory.

>>355005120

The real question is when should I ditch my 960

Maybe it's time I get rid of my 760.

Would a 1060 be worth it from a 760?

>>355000386
>On average, when using Vulkan, a 1060 is 27.13% better than a 480.
>tested on only 2 games
>one of them is Talos Principle, with no link to the article and no way to know if the game had yet properly supported Vulkan
I don't doubt the other stats, but this one is just silly with such a sample size.

File: Mafia III high quality 1080p.png (35KB, 682x840px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 682x840px

>>355005289

You made the mistake of buying a 780ti i'm afraid. I'm sorry for your loss.

>>355005785

I would bet that specific data is taken from phoronix's testing (i.e linux).

>>355005602
a gtx 770 was $100 cheaper than a 680 at the time of release. the 390/x is over $100 more than a 290/x at release.

>At least the 390x has higher core clocks
literally any 290/x can achieve those clocks.

fun fact: early 390x cards where literally 290x 8gb cards with a new bios. people opened them up and found stickers which said 290x and some bios' even still said 290x. google it if you don't believe me.

>and more (and faster) memory.

again, a 290x could achieve those memory clocks.

the more memory argument is stupid since it's been factually proven that the 3xx series cards can not utilize a full 8gb vram as they're literally not powerful enough.

>>355005627
When Volta is released

>>355005840
>a 1080 can't even get 60fps on Mafia 3 in 1920x1080
Damn. How badly did the devs have to screw up to make even a 1080 struggle in 1080p

>>355005840
>using the worst port in recent history as an example of gpu potential

are you actually retarded or just trolling?

>>355005120
I'm a familiar with that feel.

>>355005840
Buying any videocard other than titan is a mistake. Even titan is mistake when nvidia releases a newer titan.

File: 1476677562152.png (277KB, 598x566px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 598x566px

>>355005840

b-but I bought it 3 years ago and the salesman said it would be good for at least 5 years

>>355006014

Sounds good to me

File: dex_1920.jpg (158KB, 548x629px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 548x629px

>>355006013

>again, a 290x could achieve those memory clocks.

Not really - most 290x models won't run their memory at 1500mhz error free unlike all 390x models.

>>355006086

It was never designed to run above 30fps.

>>355006147

Kepler has aged like rancid milk.

>>355006147
well are you struggling to run any games? i very much doubt you are because i know people with weaker 770's who are still playing games at 1080p 60 fps at ~high settings. the 780 ti is significantly more powerful.

>>355005774
Absolutely. The 760 is about 950 levels. The 1060 is a 980.

File: 1474329984156.jpg (24KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 320x320px

>>35500629

Naw I'm happy with my 780TI. I'm just being overdramatic.

>400fps on runescape

>>355006147
3GB is a bit of a problem, but even that benchmark shows its the same as a 970.

File: lmaoingatyourlife.jpg (30KB, 620x412px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 620x412px

>poorfag cards

who cares

>>354993972
>4gb

lol

>>355006626
>turbo sexist misogynist hitler

leave

>>354998096
>>play at 1680x1050
are you me?

>>355001820
>No, 480 is more powerful.
How to spot a retarded AMDfag

File: 1476729799160.jpg (270KB, 850x593px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 850x593px

>>355006803

this

i'm with her

So is a 1050 ti worth upgrading from a 760?

>>355007202
Damn she aged like shit. She looks like a fucking bin bag with all those creases now.

>>354999135
It's supposedly faster than a 960 with huge overclock potential

>>354998005
The numbers aren't supposed to match dumbass. 1050 Ti > 960

>>355006803
trump-kun is the hero we need

Is it time to upgrade from my GTX 480 because I'm a cheap, poor fuck?

>>354993972
>1060 was already the budget card with marginal increase over a 970
>Now comes an even more budget card

How shit it gonna be?

Tfw just bought a poorfag rx 460 4 days ago because my old card was kill

>>355010513
You could have bought a used 970/290 for 150 bucks or less which are both way more powerful than a shitty 460. Even a 950 is better than a 460 in every game.

>>355010854
Remember, I'm a poorfag. I bought the 2gb version of rx 460 too because the 4gb is out of my budget.
A 950 would bottleneck my phenom ii x4 965 too i think...

No worries I'll build a new system by the end of 2017

>>355011052
>950
>bottleneck

That 460 is way worse than a 950 in terms of overheard. The 950 and nvidia cards in general are much more efficient than amd counterparts on piss poor hardware.

You're basicslly losing performance by using a 460 when you could have gained performance with a 950.

>>355010873
No

>>355000074
you can do the same w/ pc

>Tfw still on a GTX560Ti-448
>Tfw there's no 560Ti or 750Ti equivalent this generation
>Tfw I desperately need to upgrade

File: new speccy.jpg (44KB, 660x525px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 660x525px

Who GTX1080 here?

>>355000386
>LINKING TO PLEBBIT
You need to go back.

File: 1448167468624.png (211KB, 327x316px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 327x316px

>>355000023
>Implying your shitty budget card is gonna play games on high with a solid 60 on 1080p.

>>354993972
>these cheap cards can play these games

I can play all 5 games a 60fps 1080p no lag or anything on a gtx550ti

>>355011216
Oh well, at least this one is better than my hd 7850 2gb

>>355012123
>30 c

Is your room at 20 c or some shit?

I envy you, my idle is 40-50 because its 30 c in this hellhole and the 770 burns like a bitch in my room corner tower

File: speccy stats.jpg (61KB, 699x531px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 699x531px

>>355012348
I believe the 6700K just is much cooler at idle than let's say the 2700K.
Pic related is my previous build, same case with a stronger CPU cooler than the current one I have.

>>355012123
>1920x1080 60hz

Nigger even my 980 is overkill for 1080p. I can run most games 1440p ultra on DSR.

>>355012657
Trust me, TERA and BNS still can't 60fps at max settings all the time even with the GTX1080 anyhow.

File: Unbenannt.png (31KB, 581x413px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 581x413px

>>355012123
Im also PC Bro!

Reminder:
>x50
The absolute bare minimum required for older games, will probably run ones from 2 years ago on medium at best. Only get these if you have very little interest in gaming with your machine - like a laptop, for example.
>x60
Decent budget option that has a solid chance of running current games on medium-high, but cannot handle more than 1080p or 60fps on current stuff.
>x70
Solid entry point, decent cards that will run current games on high/ultra and have some reasonable future proofing to them as well. Can likely handle 1440p stuff at a good framerate, or even 144fps on 1080p, without much difficulty. Will probably work for 4k if you're willing to turn down your settings and accept a lower framerate.
>x80
Likely the highest end card currently available to consumers. Will run pretty much anything on Ultra at a reasonable framerate unless the port is a mess, can handle higher framerates and resolutions much better than an x70. You'll likely not have to sacrifice on setting at 1080p@60fps for a good long while, and even when you eventually do you'll be running shit on High pretty well even then.


Do not buy an x50 card unless you're a massive poorfag only really looking to run older games and maybe squeak by on low/medium settings on lower-requirement modern ones.

>>355005785
>No way to know if the game had yet properly supported Vulkan
it does

>>355003417
>the gtx 770 is still a good 1080p card though.

No it's not. The measly 2GB of VRAM will prohibit you from playing pretty much anything recent.

>>355012257
>solid 60

Hah, what a cuck you are, paying more money for the 60 FPS meme.

I played Crysis at 30 FPS when it came out. Go back your shitty farming sims, newfag.

>>355007202
I want to fuck young adult hilary.

>>355013224
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bH3iZ9D4uc

you sure nigglet?

>>355001168
Not him, but you're a bit retarded there friendo, both the 1060 and 480 can get well over 100 FPS at all times maxing it out, hell check out the benchmark posted earlier in the thread if you don't believe me

I hate how these pointless fanboy war threads bring out retards in full force like you and the guy you're replying to

>>355012123
>1080p
>60hz

Nigger get a higher refreshrate monitor, 1080 is perfect for 1080p/120-144fps. It's literally like you bought a ferrari and don't shift out of 2nd gear.

>>355013224
imo its the best used budget card

>>355003138
>and overwatch looks like shit compared to the PS4 version
Who would do that, just go on the internet and lie?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMbLfe6T3lM

>>355013534
I mainly upgraded for VR desu.

>>355013808
subjectiv

>>355004790
>strawman like a mongoloid

like clockwork

>>355013140

Croteam themselves state vulkan in talos principle is basically proof of concept - it still performs way slower than the other apis (which - again - croteam admit to).

>>355015503
Source? Because I got a decent performance boost from using vulkan compared to DX11 in that game on a 1060

File: IMG_06012016_210917.png (176KB, 417x600px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 417x600px

>tfw stuck with a GTX 960 2 gig
I have 200 bucks, should I save up for a 1070 or go ahead and get a 1060 6 gig?

>>354998382
I replaced a 3 year old 660 with a 960 a few months ago and it was a pretty generous jump in performance. Got it for $150 after rebate so it wasn't bad.

>>354996480
x50 cards are marketed for poorfags, of course there's compromises.

Do you poorfags finally plan to upgrade? 950 OC here. I think 1060 6 GB is the way to go anyway, games are starting to use too much fucking VRAM.

I have a 550Ti & it's about time to upgrade. What should I get for maximized performance/$?

>>355015942
if you're playing at 1080p get the 1060. or if you totally insist on getting the 1070 for whatever reason wait till the 1080 ti comes out because the 1080 and 1070 will get big price drops.

>>355015942
buy used, a 980ti

File: 1467417950681.jpg (186KB, 770x711px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 770x711px

>>355014631

>>355016521
amd 470 or nvidia 970 in the 200€ budget

OR

1060 6gb

OR gtx 1070

>>355016521
see >>355016615

File: 11_herbs_and_spices.jpg (336KB, 1200x1600px) Image search: [Google]

336KB, 1200x1600px

>>355017050
>200€
I'm American tyvm

>>355018049
>I'm American tyvm
Scum

>>355000000

My PC is coming up to 8 years unupgraded and it's no longer capable of playing new releases in any acceptable form. Looking to build a new one; got about $2000 saved up for it. Thoughts?

it's fucking over nvidicucks, just give up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxsIOV2AjMc

>>355003093
if you're saying the cheeseburger on the left is $3, and the one on the right would be its competitor in the comparison of 2 GPUs (one with 4gb vram, the other with 8) costing $4.30

The better comparison, rather than a ketchup packed and single fry, would just be a pack of fries.

>>355003157
I did something similar, but I got it within 90 days of the 970's release, so I could use EVGA's trade-up program to get the 970 for under 100$.

>>355018532
the implication is the product is the exact same (burger) and the overclock is a chip and the extra vram is the ketchup. it's implying that the extra vram isn't even required (like ketchup isn't required) because the card can't even make full use of that extra vram since it's simply not powerful enough.

>>355018991
>it's implying that the extra vram isn't even required
that varies depending on what you're doing
>the card can't even make full use of that extra vram since it's simply not powerful enough.
what?

>>355000726
Nigga live in Canacuck where building a pizza at a budget of $600 is about $200-$300 in USD.

Just build it man, it's totally worth.

File: 1364138695035.jpg (43KB, 686x700px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 686x700px

>Currently using a 680

Should I give a shit?

It seems like a cheap enough upgrade.

>>355019223
http://www.techspot.com/review/1114-vram-comparison-test/page5.html

>As for the 4GB R9 290 vs. 8GB R9 390 comparison, there was nothing to see here. Most games didn’t consume more than 4GBs of VRAM, but there were cases such as in Assassin's Creed Syndicate where with almost 5GBs of memory usage, there was still not a single frame difference. Moreover, in this Assassin's Creed Syndicate example the 290 and 390 were good for just 26fps on average, so clearly the quality settings will need to be reduced for achieving playable performance and consequently memory use will drop.

>The 390 and 390X are really graphics cards we never wanted. At the time of their release the Radeon R9 290 and 290X were exceptional buys. The 290X cost just $330, while today the 390X costs around $100 more for no additional performance and it is no different with the 290 and 390.

>We see plenty of gamers claiming that the 390 and 390X are excellent buys due to their 8GB frame buffer ensuring that they are "future proofed," and well, that simply isn’t the case, as neither GPU has the horsepower to efficiently crunch that much data. Perhaps the only valid argument here is that the larger frame buffer could support Crossfire better, but we haven’t seen any concrete evidence of this yet.

the 390 and 390x are literally a waste of money because the 200 series exists which is cheaper and just as good. the extra vram is a meme to boost sales for their rebrands and so they have a reason to charge $150 more.

>>354993972
>109 usd
>139 usd
>pascal gpu at msrp
>any gpu this gen at msrp
So the 1050 will be 149 usd and the 1050ti will be 179 usd

>>354996954
You can get a 480 4GB for 180 after rebate on newegg right now

File: 1475635554940.png (289KB, 381x418px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 381x418px

Is $370 for a 1060 fine?

>>355021372
if you're going to spend that much money on a 1060, you may aswell spend $7 more and get a 1070

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814500409&cm_re=gtx_1070-_-14-500-409-_-Product

File: 1262317192659.jpg (217KB, 848x480px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 848x480px

FERMI BURNING ON THE DANCE FLOOR

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkyhvCdJ_vM

>>355021537
>newegg
I fucking wish. Taxes will take it up to $460.

Fucking irrelevant country.

>>355019483
It's not an upgrade.

680=770=960=1050 Ti

>>355016615
>1080 and 1070 will get big price drops
bollocks

File: specs.png (24KB, 470x434px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 470x434px

This is my PC right now. I can barely run anything with AA on with high settings and mantain 60fps nowdays, should i replace my GPU? Also, does my CPU suck?

>>355022410
So every generation is roughtly +100-10?

>>355022692
Get a GoyTax 1060. Then wait a bit for the 4k meme to be viable.

>>355022950
A good GPU will beat one tier up of the previous generation. The 770 literally is a 680. The 960 is generally seen as underpowered, and the 1050 Ti sort of is too.

File: 1448129522920.jpg (17KB, 512x364px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 512x364px

>>355018491

>tfw don't support isreal

File: 02.jpg (216KB, 667x729px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 667x729px

i have no idea what these numbers mean
help me

>>355023915
I looked it up and from what I can understand is-
for the top two numbers, higher is better
for the bottom two (ignoring the date), lower is better