>putting JavaScript on the server side When will this meme die?

>>57110055
Man. There are some pretty decent reasons for that.

>>57110055
At least you don't have to deal with bullshit "toolchains" and "transpilers" and "minification" and "module bundlers" and "build systems" and "static assets" and shit on the server side.

>>57110055
>native event loop with promises makes asynchronous programming simple, allowing you to serve a much higher number of requests compared to servers that block on IO
>fastest scripting language
>concise and clear syntax
>easy OOP with ES6 classes
What's the problem?

>>57110055
I feel like you just read a few people bashing JavaScript and now you're bored with actual no real work experience.

>>57110055
dumb frogposter

>>57110174
I feel like you watched a few presentations on Node.JS now you feel like you're the smartest guy in Silicon Valley.

>>57110236
I feel like you wrote a couple versions of FizzBuzz in C and think it's the best language ever and all that anyone would ever need.

>the botnets wants me to starve

File: 1475774072977.png (41KB, 871x693px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 871x693px

>>57110055
It's not a meme, it's not even alive. Just ignore this stillborn fad and move on.

>>57110055
PHP is a lot faster and more versatile by any stretch.

Javascript is for scrubs.

>>57110242
PHP dev here, but also know Java. Guarantee I'm paid more than you.

>>57110258
Javascript dev here. Guaranteed I'm paid more than you.

>>57110269
185k maintaining legacy apps at a Fortune 100. You?

>>57110269

It only feels like more because in India you can feed your whole family on 1 USD for an entire month, but it's actually less.

>>57110277
220k at #36.

Or maybe, just maybe, you can start writing your programs in Nim instead, which can be compiled to object code but also to JavaScript itself.

>>57110285
>le pajitt XD
This stupid racist meme is the one that should die.

>>57110289
220k in CA is like 150k anywhere else in the US. Your rent/mortgage must be atrocious.

>>57110319
I don't live in CA.

>>57110319
>moving the goalposts

>>57110323
I don't buy your salary outside of CA.

>>57110332
>cost of living differences don't real
>cost of rent differences don't real

>>57110335
They offer around 170k to new graduates. It's not a stretch to hit 200k+ after a couple of years of experience.

>>57110277
576k plus stock options and bonuses at Google. You're basically poor.

>>57110055
It generally does not lose out to the likes of PHP, Ruby on Rails, and Python. Especially when it comes to performance and ease of finding developers. Though Java with Jetty is probably better if you're looking to do a larger project.

>>57110351
https://www.glassdoor.com/Salary/Google-Mountain-View-Salaries-EI_IE9079.0,6_IL.7,20_IC1147431.htm

Lies.

>>57110351
This is true if your company offers tons of bonuses (FB, Google, etc). It's usually $150k, then $50k-100k of other stuff like stocks.

>>57110355
Google doesn't offer stock options.

>>57110316
>shitskin can't handle the banter
Why are you a humorless people?

>>57110381
They don't for fresh hires. A lot of employers that have been here for almost a decade get them.

When the tech bubble pops

>>57110386
because of toilet witches

>write JS on server side
>write JS on front end
>write JS applications in electron
>get money
>make /g/ mad
I love this job.

>>57110255
>22.3% uses asp.net & asp.net mvc
>microsoft is moving to asp.net core
>breaks almost everything if you try to update because they restructured a lot of asp.net and removed some features
What a great way to keep your user base microsoft

File: 26990523-Angry-unhappy-elderly-man-or-worker-or-boss-corporate-executive-asking-what-s-the-problem-who-cares--Stock-Photo[1].jpg (235KB, 1300x1278px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1300x1278px

>>57110055
Why should I have to hire PHP/Java/.NET pajeets when I already have pajeets working on the client-side JS?

>>57110083
name 3 (tre) reasons then

I hope you motherfucking worthless js faggots die in the most painful way. Fucking bastardized cancerous monkey.

>>57110386
1 - It's not funny.

2 - It's offensive.

3 - It disseminates systemic racism.

4 - It's against global rule #3.

Die in a fire, you stormshit!

>>57110255
>shockwave flash
somehow i doubt your pie chart now

>>57113240

Here's the source: http://intriggerapp.com/blog/web-technologies-benchmark-report/

>using javascript
when will this meme die

>>57113240
There's a lot of old sites and it probably takes into account all the flash and shockwave games...

>>57113474
i checked the source, it specifically says backend

>>57113483
Mhmm... Sickening.

File: 14322678_1266687986696939_1974742237860701477_n.jpg (4KB, 173x119px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 173x119px

>>57110055
>javascript
>2017-1

>>57110255

>ASP.NET>Java EE

Didn't expect that. But why are so many Java and so less .NET jobs out there?

>>57110289
>>57110277
>>57110319
>>57110355
800k and facebook stocks + 8 inch cock how can you white bois even compete?

>>57110055
Dumb frogposter

>>57113625
because you're from murrica, to you guys even cards with chip are something new and mysterious...

>>57110128
>native event loop with promises makes asynchronous programming simple, allowing you to serve a much higher number of requests compared to servers that block on IO
this is a feature of node, not JS
>fastest scripting language
dubious claim. and if you want speed you should be using something like Go instead
>concise and clear syntax
insofar as it copies C style syntax, yes. there's nothing "concise" or "clear" about JavaScript's type system.
>easy OOP with ES6 classes
you've got semi functional classes with no access modifiers. still don't see how that makes it a good choice for back end software

>What's the problem?
there are better alternatives.

File: yotsuba1.jpg (40KB, 525x318px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 525x318px

>>57110128
>concise and clear syntax

>>57110083
Like?

>>57118474
Nice one hahahahaha
Node.js in a nutshell

>>57110055
Runtimes with native high performance event loops can implicitly deal with a high volume of concurrent connection loads and thus make for good web servers.

Deal with it.

SINGLE
THREAD

File: Cu6CZiUVYAEiXK1.jpg (80KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 1600x1600px

>>57118827

>>57118474
>functions inside nested JSON
>nested JSON
You fucked up, anon.

>>57118827
>he doesn't want to fork a new process himself
>he doesn't want to have another server to port bind
>implying port binding is hard
Fucking lazy.

>>57113235
>racism on my 4chan?
>It's more likely than you think
Everyone hates everything here, get used to it.

>>57110055
It literally makes no difference. There's nothing inherently insecure about JavaScript. Ruby makes far less sense as a server language.

>>57113235
>poo in the loo
reddit moderator spotted.

>>57118827
>require('cluster')

>>57110128
>easy OOP with ES6 classes
>not prototypal inheritance

Die in a fire.

>>57118827
web-worker support is on the todo list for v7. check github. at the moment they're generalizing v8's message passing mechanism into something better than JSON. that is necessary for threading to work well

>>57119412
>There's nothing inherently insecure about JavaScript.

Weak typing

>>57120409
faggot typing