macOS

While I only use Sierra in a VM, the performance is vastly superior to El Capitan on the same hardware also in a VM so, if it can outperform El Capitan in that respect I would imagine it should be pretty damned nice on an actual MacBook or iMac.

Only one way to know for sure and since it's free of cost it can't hurt. Back up the system completely and then go for it.

It's a decent upgrade. Performance is as good if not better than El Cap, and the new window management features (tabs, Safari PiP, window snapping and auto-expansion) are nice.

I also love the auto-unlock feature with my Apple Watch.

>>57095270
yup absolutely. as fast or slightly faster than el cap and many new useful features including pip, universal copy/paste, the built in junk file cleaner, icloud desktop, and siri.

>>57095281
Do you really think it's faster? Honestly, where there any downsides?

>>57095327
And what if you don't care for the icloud features, is it a decent upgrade?

>>57095337
sure. it's not like you need to clean install anyway. osx upgraders are pretty fool proof

>>57095270
retard pls it's still on .0, so obv shit.

>>57095270
>fagOS

>>57095270
no. they should have included AppleFS in the final version. Performance is basically the same

>>57095330
Not that guy, I'm running it on my macbook.
The only downside is the freaking notification center that is completely white even in dark mode, might be fixed though.

Other downside I heard is mission control now follows your fingers, it's not a flick up to mc or mc off (if you flick your fingers 2 millimeters it will just bounce back), it's retarded but I heard people complain about it.

>>57097758
both of these things annoy me so much, but i like everything else they did with the update.

>>57097613
>they should have included AppleFS in the final version.

APFS isn't ready yet, Apple have been made no bones about it still being very beta.
Don't expect it until 10.13 or iOS 11.