PAL or NTSC or SECAM which one is /g/ using? Doing a survey.

>>57094969
You might as well just ask where people live what the hell?

PAL.

>>57094990
Europoor detected

>50hz or 60hz
Who gives a shit, everything's either 24 or 30fps anyway

>>57095166

50hz is retarded.

Literally no monitor/tv uses that retarded refresh rate.

tl;dr NTSC master race

>>57095188
>NTSC
>not ATSC
Pleb detected.

>>57094969
My country uses SECAM although I personally do not watch TV.

File: Digital_broadcast_standards.svg.png (100KB, 800x406px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 800x406px

>>57094969
>2016
>not using ATSC, DVB, ISDB, or DTMB.

File: ape.png (174KB, 591x392px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 591x392px

>>57094969
>mfw I found out a lot of PAL content is sped up by 4% with no pitch adjustment

>>57095460
i live in a PAL country, and only found that out relatively recently as well (relative to how many movies i've watched on dvd/vhs, naturally all PAL)

it's not noticable, if you put them side to side perhaps, but i nor anyone i know have ever noticed that things were sped up

around the same time, i also found out NTSC releases of 24fps content use 3:2 pulldown, adding horrible judder

i'll take unnoticable speedup over 3:2 pulldown any day

>>57095518
>it's not noticable, if you put them side to side perhaps, but i nor anyone i know have ever noticed that things were sped up
PAL is 20% higher res than NTSC, you must be blind.
also if not pitch-corrected, all those actors will sound very different.

>>57095727
>PAL is 20% higher res than NTSC, you must be blind.
i'm commenting only about the speed difference

>also if not pitch-corrected, all those actors will sound very different.
yes, probably, but the speedup is not so great that one can tell it's wrong without something to compare it to

>>57095727
i remember in my super autistic DVD ripping days, i used to source the video from the PAL encodes as a lot of what I was encoding had higher quality transfers + DVD9 encodes from that region, so i'd take the video and do some sweet anamorphic 1024x576 DVDRips and then slow down the video + audio using some MKV flags to change the framerate of the content (if it was in fact just sped up).

>>57095789
far easier to slow 25fps video to 24/1.001 than to fuck around trying to fix telecined ntsc video

>>57095166
Ntsc console games run faster because as much as you buy the 24fps hype train, all 2d consoles are tied refresh rate therefore 60fps ntsc 56ish pal

>>57095847
pal is 50Hz

i find 50fps to be reasonably smooth, and later consoles (ps2+) had many games where you could pick pal or ntsc upon startup, pal60 is master race though if supported (pal res + 60Hz)

>>57095152
>euro
literally the other side of the world mate

>>57095460
>>57095518
>>57095727
The pitch is corrected though, but the speedup is very noticeable if you're not a casual shitter. Honestly go watch a movie which contains a song that you know. If you don't notice the speedup you must be one of those people who plays games at 20 fps and sees no problem with it.

>>57094969
I don't watch TV

>>57096457
they did get into the habit of pitch correcting eventually, but there are PAL discs out there that seriously did not pitch correct anything. Like the entire run of Seinfeld on DVD for the PAL regions is pitched up. It's horrific.

>>57094969
PAL was better.

Does it even matter anymore?

>pal
>ntsc
>secam
This is all irrelevant these days everywhere except for the former NTSC region.

Like XBOX/Wii/etc all run native 60Hz regardless where you live. Films on Blu-ray are typically the native content refresh rate in Europe-based areas (25/24/50/60Hz). Television broadcasts are usually 50Hz.

For some reason in America, many televisions are still made which today won't touch 50/25Hz content. This means that programmes made to these framerates will need to be converted, adding interpolation noise or jitter.

>>57095188
This is wrong.
Almost every television ever made for the European market will switch between 60/50/24 depending on the input.
When the CRT was popular, it would even change it's resolution depending on the content to ensure native resolution (625 line for PAL/SÉCAM and 525 line for NTSC).

>still no good GC emulation

>>57096801
Just get a cheap Wii second hand and softmod it.

>>57094969
None.
Why would you use SD quality at this point?

>>57096824
I'd still need a TV. I don't want to buy a TV.

File: a.jpg (384KB, 724x563px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 724x563px

>>57096801
?

>>57096840
You can get VGA out of a wii, if you make a custom wire that sticks RGB into the VGA

3840x2160 YCbCr 4:2:0 over HDMI

>>57094969
>analog TV

>NTSC plebs

>>57095808
Actual film cinema should be slowed down to exact 24fps. 24000/1001 is an intermediate when doing conversion between 24fps and 29.97 though nowadays non cinema digital cameras have 24000/1001 rather than pure 24fps to partially skip conversion.

Ain't this concept obsolete now?

>>57094969
every country I've lived is NTSC

>NTSC
>retarded as fuck 29.97fps

>>57098472
it's actually 29.97002997fps

>>57096801
Dolphin works well for me. Some games will need some configuration changes, but it's really not that hard.

>>57095188
>Salty NTSC user detected

>>57095460
Films broadcast in 24fps
Most PAL television is half mains sync @ 25Hz
More or less lossless why to convert formats.

File: 3_2_pulldown_ntsc.jpg (59KB, 540x383px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 540x383px

>>57099255
you also end up with nice full/progressive, consistantly-timed frames, unlike the hack done with ntsc

>>57099353
American telly should just be abolished!

>>57098676
>Dolphin
>HLE
>>/out/

>>57100304
You know you can use other stuff, too, right?

File: 1fb.png (273KB, 600x583px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 600x583px

>>57099353
>tfw my country fell for the NTSC meme

Unless you're into retro stuff, NTSC and PAL haven't been relevant for years. What exactly is the point of this thread?

>>57094969
>argentina, uruguay, paraguay and brazil use PAL instead of the rest of America
That's proof that we're european right there my man

>>57094969
I remember people talk about PAL and NTSC back when DVDs and televisions were a thing. How are they relevant today? If these things still .. matter somehow then I guess I am using whatever I get when I open qbittorrent and search for a movie title and open that in vlc and view it. I haven't had a television or DVD player in 10+ years.

>Using composite video

No thanks, it's RGB SCART for me.

>>57095883

>pal60 is master race though if supported (pal res + 60Hz)
That's not true actually, it still runs at NTSC resolution, it simply uses PAL colour encoding which is vastly superior.