Does the Pixel have the best camera? And how did they achieve

simple. They thought different :^)

>latest flagship phone has best x feature

>implying the next latest phone won't have the best x feature

Nothing extraordinary here OP.

Samsung Glelaxy 8 will have better x feature when it release next year

iPhone 8 will have better x feature when it releases next year.

The cycle continues.

>>57093116

Pixel is only released 1 month after the iPhone.

>>57093083
Kek.

File: 20160928-google-pixel-phone-010.jpg (36KB, 970x484px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 970x484px

>>57093074
>And how did they achieve this without having a bump on the back of the phone?
Instead of a bump the whole upper part became fatter.

Tbh not having a bump on the camera is the only good thing of the pixel's horrendous design

>>57095339
There's absolutely nothing wrong with that.

>>57095379
>There's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
1. non-symmetry rarely looks good
google product photography is hiding it like Apple did with the iPhone 6 bump. let's see how it looks in real life.

2. not making it uniform and fit in a bigger battery
for what exactly?

>>57095339
Pixel is ugly as hell and not water resistant. No buy

>>57093074
For a cellphone camera that might be good, but that grass might as well be brown.

File: LlqaAPO.png (278KB, 500x488px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 500x488px

>>57095510
iPhone looks so much better

>>57095339
I feel nauseous just looking at this picture. I was interested in getting a Pixel, but no fucking way now.

>>57093074
>Does the Pixel have the best camera?
wait for reviews. NDA will likely drop soon. Apple dropped there's 3 days before launch.
rumor is Google only sent out Pixel XL review samples tho. guess Pixel has some thermal issues or sth.
Google didn't do themselves any favors with releasing sample photos claiming to be #unfiltered but having exif data from postprocessing software.
that exclusive dxomark review is also questionable with sample photos all shitty downscaled with obv aliasing everywhere.
just going by specs, not having OIS will be a minus. their EIS can't correct handshake and isn't even on for stills anyway.

>>57095339
>be a hand model
>not even shave your hands