/wt/ watch thread

File: DSC_9833[1].jpg (523KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

523KB, 1800x1200px

something something steinhart is ok desu

>>57080969
Steinhart is almost as bad as this newfag who spams his posts regardless of how much they get removed >>57080987

File: PhotoEditor-1476509809601.jpg (231KB, 975x1028px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 975x1028px

Why did orient have to go and make the lugs on this thing so huge?

File: watchsize.png (18KB, 834x380px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 834x380px

>>57081032
What does it look like from the side

>>57081011
Last one wasn't.

File: AudemarsPiguet15202Timetapestry05_zpsbd88a4ae.jpg~original.jpg (446KB, 700x686px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 700x686px

>>57081069
You've still gotten your posts removed dozens of times and keep doing it.

Mods/Janitors might just be asleep.

File: 476510426488.jpg (630KB, 2383x1613px) Image search: [Google]

630KB, 2383x1613px

>>57081040
It's pushing it.

>>57081011
get mad fag
i guess

>>57081094
You've had posts removed too. I'm only proving a point. Without you, none of this would have happened.

>>57081100
It'll work

>>57081108
I don't repost anything that's been removed. Because I don't spam. Unlike some newfags I know.

File: 1.jpg (993KB, 2268x4032px) Image search: [Google]

993KB, 2268x4032px

>>57081117
It works alright. I just can't help thinking how much the watch would be improved if it had lugs more like the skx or turtle.

Have you tried just not responding to the trolls? I kind of just creates drama. It's not like he/they do it to other tripfags to nearly the same extent.

>>57081153
wtf

why do u wear a broken watch, moron

>>57081153
Well I can't tell from the picture, does the bracelet slope down at a greater angle than the lugs? That can create a more smooth looking transition.

Also, the drama can sometimes summon some form of moderation to the thread. Which can help clean it up.

>>57081160
not mine, just a record of that timeless omega quality.

>>57081167
It transitions fine. I guess asking for much more might be a waste at the mako price point.

File: speedsonic.jpg (190KB, 1536x1152px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1536x1152px

>there will never be a tuning fork speedmaster in a modern case

Posting the absolutely fucking based Moon watch. My watch. My nigger...

NB, It's a beautiful classic, but be warned, it's useless for timing lapdances. Those hands become invisible in strip clubs.

>>57081209
It's got lume on the second hand. And that second hand is probably only going to make a trip or two around given the fact that they play really short songs generally.

Unless you can somehow get the DJ to play 'Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald' for your lap dance.

>>57081220
Yeah, the lume on all the hands is good, but something about this watch in nightclubs makes all the hands disappear :-)

And it was an hour long dance. Fucking right cutey too. But that's a habit I shook years ago - basically a takeaway wank. Very frustrating.

This watch is a demi-God though. Mine's currently in for servicing, can't wait to get it back.

File: stolen double tourbillon.png (671KB, 649x615px) Image search: [Google]

671KB, 649x615px

>>57081259
>but something about this watch in nightclubs makes all the hands disappear
The women, if you're not lucky.

Personally I just wouldn't wear a cheap watch to a strip club.

File: group025c.jpg~original.jpg (84KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 800x600px

>>57081304
>Personally I just wouldn't
would* obviously.

Maybe a nice cheap, modern, Seiko Diver?

>>57081220
The album version of Shine On You Crazy Diamond is the best lapdance song, that bitch has a 7.5 minute long intro.

File: Gruen_Curvex_370.jpg (2MB, 2448x2008px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x2008px

>>57081330
Fuck, I used to listen to music with this girl a long time ago. We'd listen to something of mine, then something of hers, and then something of mine.

Every time she'd try slip thru a song like that.

>>57081313

Haha,
Yeah.
I think that double tourbillon is ugly as sin!

These Seiko's are really nice, are they mechanical?

>>57081330
Something about Born to Die by Lana Del Rey makes me want to see strippers dance to it. Sexy AF.

>>57081407
Yeah.

Those are all vintage though. Upper left is the 62MAS, the grand daddy of Seiko divers.

>>57081423

Thanks anon, I'm a little bit in love now.
Just checked eBay - a bit outside what I want to pay. I have a nice, tidy Seamaster as well as the Moon watch but it doesn't have the dive timer.

I always thought if I got an actual dive watch I'd just go with a Rolex because stone cold classic. But these really turned my head.

Did Seiko pioneer this design? If they did Rolex can suck it, and I might home in on one of these one day...

File: 20161014_235319.jpg (4MB, 2758x1591px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2758x1591px

New watch day, senpaitachi.

File: 20161014_230801.jpg (2MB, 1623x1700px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1623x1700px

>>57081561
Lugs are a bit longer than I expected

File: 62MAS.jpg (93KB, 999x750px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 999x750px

>>57081509
62MAS Was really a Seiko design thru and thru. The Submariner, Seamaster and Fifty fathoms all really had a different look about them and had their own things going on.

I really am just throwing this out there -- but as far as I've seen, I don't think there was a watch before the 62MAS that used a rotating diver's bezel and a date window. And many dive watches with date windows that came after didn't have an applied frame like the 62MAS. Like the Seamaster 120, which was the first Seamaster with a date window that came out 1 year after the 62MAS.

File: 20161014_235412.jpg (3MB, 2973x1836px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2973x1836px

>>57081561
>>57081573
State of the collection, less the Tutima Flieger GMT being serviced. I think 6 watches might be a little much. Which one should I sell?

>>57081581
It's lovely, servicing looks kind of impossible tho.
Submariner came out ten years earlier, not sure if it had the rotating bezel.
For me it's kinda like; who cracked the look, cos everyone after that is just copying it.

I think a Submariner is a better choice for vintage, because I presume Rolex aftermarket is leagues ahead?

It is a lovely watch though...

>>57081584

> Which one should I sell?

All of them, and buy something iconic that cognoscenti will recognise on sight. Just my 2 cents.

>>57081620
>Submariner came out ten years earlier, not sure if it had the rotating bezel.
It did, but submariner date model didn't become a thing until 2008.

>because I presume Rolex aftermarket is leagues ahead?
I'm not sure how it is in Japan, but for us on the outside, it's probably going to be much easier with the Rolex.

File: 2c81.jpg (132KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1280x960px

>>57081581
Case design and hands remind me of a vintage Seastar.

>>57081584
If it's purely on the decision to reduce the amount of watches, i'd go for either the fortis or the flieger, as these are somewhat the same model.

Not a fan of the Sinn on the left, but it's your largest model, so keep it. Nice collection.

>>57081627
Seems you missed the Tangomat? That's a proper recognizable watch.

>>57081627
When I can afford a Speedy sometime next year, I'll sell at least the fliegers. For now I'll just sell either one of the fliegers or the SARX.

>>57081633
I can see why you would say that, it's also funny that both those vintage watches got put on a modern strap with similar texture. lol

That being said, the Seiko is older, but I still see some differences between the two.

File: Rodania.jpg (203KB, 1600x1198px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 1600x1198px

Here's an interesting one. Internal diving bezel Rodania with date, supposedly from 1964 according to the fleabay listing.

snap

>>57081584
The Sinn chrono. You have two Sinns and two very similar-looking chronos.
>>57081573
Yeah the long and thin lugs always weirded me out, in pictures at least.

>>57081723
>rodina
:^)

File: 20161014_150747.jpg (2MB, 3096x4128px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3096x4128px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uH-gq2T5Bxo

>>57081584
Get something vintage while you're at it.

Worth bidding on?

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-SEIKO-Automatic-Watch-SEIKOMATIC-Weekdater-6218-8970-35J-SS-1960s-/272413146008?hash=item3f6d16bb98:g:5c0AAOSwzaJYAKKl

How do you guys tell apart replicas/bootlegs from cheap vintages or auctions starting low?
I saw a bunch of rolexes and omegas starting way under 1K in auctions, wondering if they are replicas or just the seller expecting a quick rise.

>>57082244
mm

Dial is in good shape and the movement was serviced at some point. Case lines are clean and even if they were buffed/polished they were done well enough.

But no idea when it was serviced, and the caseback was badly refinished. Crystal needs to be replaced. Buy cheap if you're willing to get it properly worked on.

>>57082298
Research,read and learn.

Not much else.

>>57082326
The first thing I will do with a watch that old is giving it to someone to service it. I really like the design and the prospect of getting a cal.6218A is interesting.

It would be my first watch for a long time actually, I stopped wearing them when I started studying years ago. Lets see how high the price gets, otherwise Ill just settle for a Seiko 5 I guess.

File: 1423940706837.jpg (9KB, 235x215px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 235x215px

>>57082455
It'll go from 110 to 185$ depending on how many people are interested in it.

Which is an okay price for a 6218, since they usually go for the 200$ range. A brand new crystal for this specific model will cost 15$. Servicing is up to where you send it, and that assuming you're sending to a watchmaker who has at least more than two and half brain cells.

The 62XX cal movements are very reliable and have a VERY present rotor that pretty neat to feel, and the only real disadvantage is that the day display is only semi quicksettable.

Also
>tfw when there is a really good condition Cosmotron on sale for cheap
>tfw when it's only real big flaw is a nasty scratch on the crystal
>tfw when you won't have any luck sourcing another facted crystal

File: IMG_20161015_104337.jpg (154KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 720x720px

Wristwatch check guys!

Today I'm wearing my vintage 1980 Seiko 5. It's got a comfy domed acrylic crystal and looks great on a navy blue perlon.

>>57082523
lets see, hoping to get it cheap of course.

Even tho I would love having it I can get a Seiko 5 and a Burei with Seiko NH35 movement in neat condition for about 140$ together, which would fit more outfits and are decent watches themselves.

Lets just hope it wont go up much more, currently I am the highest bidder.

>>57082537

Genuinly interested, with which clothes do you wear that?

Golden watches always look a bit like a wannabe-show-off to me and even tho I like the design I have no idea what to wear them with.

>>57081304
>600k watch
>still bangs cheap strippers
Nouveau rich pleb

>>57081584
The Nomos

>>57082586
>currently I am the highest bidder
Dumbest thing you can do famalam, since there are obviously other people gunning for it.

Easier to snipe to bid, since other people are doing it and will likely outbid you on it via that method.

>>57082596
I usually wear it with a casual button down shirt and jeans. It's not a dress watch so it goes fine with casual attire imho.

>>57082596
>>57082764
Although today I'm wearing it with jeans and a t-shirt as I just felt the urge to wear it after not wearing it for a while.

Is a fully golden plated watch too gaudy?

File: s-l1600 (21).jpg (124KB, 1600x1066px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1600x1066px

>>57082794
You have to take it further boy.

>>57082794
>plated
yes
get a gold watch

>>57082806
Would like to, but I can't spare hundreds and hundreds of dollars.

>>57082794
Not if you have the balls to wear it. Imo plated is just like pvd, its merely a style. Girls dont think youre gold watch is real gold anyway

>>57082829
Girls are irrelevant to me, making a good impression on teachers and important contacts for career networking is more important.

>>57082852
Ajahahajjajaahaahahahahahaahhahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaa
>he buys a watch to impress people
>he thinks he can even slightly impress non watch people with a watch

Man my stomach is hurting from the good keks, most you get out of a watch is compliments or slight envy for a few seconds. Just get a clean dress watch like a orient bambino v2 and that will be more than fine.

File: orient-bambino-v2.jpg (438KB, 2406x1600px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 2406x1600px

>>57082947
I also want one because I've always liked them, if it helps my image it's a plus.

>orient bambino v2
You know what, the gold version of that looks exactly like what I wanted. I'll get one.

>>57083160
>v2
kek

V1 or bust.

>>57083190
The roman numbers are simply too charming to pass on.

>>57083160
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NaGA3iFeVs
I'm a sucker for skeletons, and the Eminence just seems like a flatter semi-skeleton Bambino. Tough choice, but the Eminence is looking better right now.

File: IMG_3929.jpg (633KB, 608x1599px) Image search: [Google]

633KB, 608x1599px

Reminder that these are the main value watches a poorfag can get.

>>57083160
I agree, best bambino design/colour choice.

>>57083250
open heart watches go surprisingly well with fedoras.

>>57083357
>invicta
>seagull
>vostok k34
>alpha
>rodina
please stop post

>manually winding ETA movements damages them

Why did this defective product come to be so popular?

File: 1472329189135s.jpg (2KB, 70x125px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 70x125px

>>57082852
>Girls are irrelevant to me

>>57084073

Because 95% of the watchmaking industry and watch buying public stopped giving the slightest fuck about the practical engineering of mechanical watch movements in 1975.

This is why there has been little to no substantive improvement in the accuracy, shock resistance, ease of regulation, correcting of design flaws (like hand winding on the ETA 2824-2), or lengthening of service intervals based on materials engineering.

Modern mechanical watchmaking is about manufacturing perceived prestige based on marketing and on soaking up watchmaking labour on decoration or gimmicks, with zero fucks whatsoever given by anyone barring Rolex about improving the practical engineering of volume produced mechanical movements.

>>57084073
Because they are accurate movements.

With the popularisation of automatic movements hand winding isn't really necessary. But even if you should handwind, keeping the watch in good condition with regular servicing should result in no more damage than any other movement being hand wound (Should it have the feature anyway)

File: 71M13d-jZYL._UL1500_.jpg (258KB, 1500x1500px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 1500x1500px

What do you guys think about this watch:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Alienwork-Automatic-Self-winding-Mechanical-Stainless/dp/B00RGW4YHA/ref=sr_1_2?s=watch&ie=UTF8&qid=1476542734&sr=1-2

It looks really good and is really cheap. But I worry that it will fall apart after a month or two of everyday carry.

I've been wishing for a new everyday watch. I own an Ingersoll but it's too thick to be practically carried. Also it's a little bit too indiscrete for my tastes, which I guess goes for this one too but it's not as expensive.

I inherited an old Citizen Watch Titanium, which was sleek and plain, which I like, but it soon broke down on me. Looking for a new one now and the girlfriend pointed this one out.

>>57084931
>https://www.amazon.co.uk/Alienwork-Automatic-Self-winding-Mechanical-Stainless/dp/B00RGW4YHA/ref=sr_1_2?s=watch&ie=UTF8&qid=1476542734&sr=1-2

Absolute worst degree of dogshit.

Get a brand new Seiko 5 and be done with it.

>>57084931
>It looks really good
nah

File: s-l1600.jpg (417KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 1600x1600px

im a poorfag wanting to go /mechanical/
how reliable would a chink watch be, you think?
are they too autistic maybe?
>http://www.ebay.com/itm/New-Men-Classic-Transparent-Steampunk-Skeleton-Mechanical-Stainless-Steel-Watch-/390945555537?var=&hash=item5b062bc451:m:m2jIKZsQ0j-tJoRKWR2oHRA

>>57085053
see >>57084968

If you're even too poor for that get a brand new Komandirskie for 30$, and slap it on a 2$ nato off aliexpress.

>>57085079
ok that might be affordable thanks

>>57084917
>keeping the watch in good condition with regular servicing should result in no more damage than any other movement

Not according to the watch repair anon

>>57083357
Barf.jpg

Why do so many people here fall for overpriced meme watches that never hold their value?

>>57085450
Because some people don't care about resale value if they plan on keeping their watches

File: 1414583333530.jpg (134KB, 600x455px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 600x455px

mtfw modding my Komadirskie cost me 5 times the cost of the watch

File: 1476547360994157363650.jpg (4MB, 3984x2988px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3984x2988px

Wat do? ;_; just got scratched today...

>>57085627
>Take good pics of it
>put it on eBay
>sell it for 30-40% less
>save money for a diver with sapphire crystal since you are too clumsy or get a cheap Amphibia which you can polish anytime with toothpaste

>>57084917
>have an ETA-2834(iirc) for year and a half
>used to handwound it if it stopped
>now it feels like some wheel has a broken teeth and if I handwind it, I can feel it skipping
God bless the swiss, god bless the horlorgerghe

Am I allowed to post smartwatches here or no? I just want color advice

>>57085871
No

>>57085891
ok

File: Okay.png (383KB, 680x875px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 680x875px

>>57085903

Just discovered Archieluxury.

I like it so far, but there is very little substance in his vids. Like in his last 1, he just repeats over and over that sometimes luxury goods get FUCKED.

At least the urban faggot vids have substance. Archie is more entertainment than watches nerding. But fuck if hes not hilarious

I have a gold watch I bought from a jeweler in western Oregon about 21 years ago. I believe the jeweler is now out of business and I was wondering if the watch is worth anything. I believe I paid around $600 for it. The watch face says 'Paul Maret' I believe. I'll take a picture of it if needed.

File: AlbinoDaytona_4.jpg (51KB, 580x396px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 580x396px

>>57083357
Anyone have sauce on the band on the Seagull 1963?

That thing is beautiful.

File: IMG_3930.jpg (34KB, 600x401px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 600x401px

>>57086514
>I have a gold watch I bought from a jeweler in western Oregon about 21 years ago.

>>57083357
>Seagull 1963
>250$
>poorfag

File: watch.jpg (301KB, 720x1280px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 720x1280px

>>57086705

I just figured maybe it's obscure enough to be desired.

probably isn't, though

Are there any nice starter rolex watches? I might just save up for a years and spend 7K on one with diamond bezel.

>>57086744
Are you sure you paid $600 for that?
It looks like a cheap Chinese quartz watch from some unknown fashion brand. Definitely not real gold. It's not exactly good oooking either.

Hey /wt/, I'm quite new to modifying watches but I want to replace my CA53W's strap with a NATO strap and I'm autistic. Is it possible to just remove the springs and replace it or do I need some type of an adapter?

>>57086832

well, it's from 1994, which was before china built anything but walls, so.

>>57086957
China was making cheap garbage for us far earlier than 1994 anon

>>57083357
>>>/forocoches/

>>57086957
>>57086514
Unless it's actually marked to be real gold, or even gold plated i seriously doubt it even has any marking. Which means is just a shiny coating that made to look like gold, plated onto a basemetal.

I'd like to say brass or SS, but counting on when it was (via the quality of Chinese products of that time) it's like some kind of unknown junk alloy.

It certainly looks to be a simple quartz chronograph movement that isn't worth much if at all. And as >>57086997 said, the chinks have been churning their sweatshop products since the early 80's.

>>57082852
Honestly a car would make a bigger impression than a watch would.

File: IMG_20161015_132507.jpg (3MB, 3120x4160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3120x4160px

Leather, perlon, or milanese mesh?

>>57087469
Perlon, or fix the endlinks on the current coffin bracelet.

And change the crystal while you're at it.

File: 246.052-2.jpg (118KB, 450x600px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 450x600px

Thoughts?

>>57081011

Why is Steinhart bad, other than being a rolex rip off?

File: 1#.jpg (1MB, 1500x844px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x844px

1/3

File: 2#.jpg (763KB, 750x1333px) Image search: [Google]

763KB, 750x1333px

2/3

File: 3#.jpg (778KB, 1150x852px) Image search: [Google]

778KB, 1150x852px

3/3

File: 1471234231417.jpg (26KB, 497x473px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 497x473px

>>57088168
>>57088145
>>57088098

File: 1325138540947.gif (2MB, 250x197px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 250x197px

>>57088098
>>57088145
>>57088168

>>57088168
I like the swatch

The others look gross.

>>57088145
Fuck, last thread I mentioned I was getting my dad's old bretiling chronomat as a graduation gift, in much better condition than that, ofc, but you fucking poo in loo have made me hate it. Even if that's a fake. Fuck you Pajeet.

>>57088501
We didn't make you hate it , you just had a sudden outbreak of good taste

File: DSCN0774.jpg (4MB, 4608x3456px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4608x3456px

im thinking about replacing the timex at work with an orient mako. Its a pretty physical job and the watch would take the ocasional hit, would the mako be up for it?

>>57088573
Mine has taken a lot of abuse in the 2 1/2 years I've had it no problem.

>>57087723
Part of that post was meant to be playful, because of the post I was replying to.

But besides being just Rolex copies, and their use of fake-aged lume, and not being especially good value for their price, they're not /that/ bad.

I just would never wear one.

>>57088573
Will most likely hold up better than the Philippine made Timex.

Another option would be to get a SKX or neo Turtle.

>>57088501
Sorry for but i got from birthday that watch and in my city there is no one willing to open it to clean

>>57088573
Get an MDV106 on a rubber or NATO
You get the 120 click bezel and the thing is indestructible.
Also nice OceANUS, I somehow managed to meme it into existence on /wt/

Why does just about every watch in here look like shit? I get that some of them have history or are solid mechanically, but I wouldn't put any of them on my wrist.

File: Atlantic Seaport.jpg (105KB, 1023x682px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 1023x682px

Convince me not to buy the Atlantic Seaport on Massdrop. I have something else I want to spend money on but I feel like it's a deal that's too good to pass up.

>>57089229
its got an ETA movement and has a masonic symbol on the dial

>>57089229
>12mm
At least it has a proper domed crystal unlike the thickodate.

Price?

>>57089287
What's wrong with ETA and since when are sextants?

>>57089288
$350.

File: IMG_2642.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>57080969
Is it time for watches with handguns?

>>57089320
i guess its not a real masonic symbol, just what it made me think of right away.

an ETA movement means its not in-house/manufacture, they made the case and the dial. basically it means that the movement/mechanics behind the dial are uninteresting.

>>57089354
No. Fuck off.

>>57089389
Shit I fucked up that sentence entirely I was going to say "since when are sextants masonic" but then I remembered that they totally are and forgot to delete the last part of the sentence.

ETA isn't in-house, but overall it's a Swiss company and that counts for something, right? As for how interesting the mechanic behind the movement is, I'm not all that concerned about that. I just want a nice looking automatic movement watch until I can afford something better.

>>57089413
...
how about shotguns?

>>57089320
So many sites making me to login to see a price. Though, it looks better than the Thickodate and the price isn't too bad.

Surprisingly enough this one is probably not a bad deal, sure it's another rather thick dress watch powered by a ETA 2824 derivative but it looks alright.

>>57089432
well then go ahead i guess, nothing wrong with ETA if you dont care.
btw just that it swiss (or says so on the dial) doesnt mean anything quality wise.

>>57089683
Did you get it from an AD or like Jomashop or something? Do the ADs have good financing options?

>>57089725
jomashop has affirm
but if you have to use that you probably shouldn't be buying a rolex.

>>57089725
>financing
Don't buy things you can't afford.

>>57089725
I live in the UK and got if from one of the ADs in London, AFAIK they don't do financing, at least in the UK.

>>57085627
>hardlex

Diamantine on a tin backed leather lap.... Or, you know, just replace the crystal.

File: DSCN0728.jpg (3MB, 4608x3456px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4608x3456px

>>57088920
no idea how, i came here after i got it. Love it though.

>>57088619
cool, thanks

>>57088653
yeah i had that thought also, which the $30 watch isnt ment to be tough but more to not care about.


i like the pepsi dial was gonna get a blue and red nato strap for it

>>57089941
Insert.

And both the SKX009 and SRP779 have the same insert, though with a black dial. Or get the Padi Turtle (SRPA21).

>>57089354
>>57089437
Yes

>>57089986
i like the seikos but im trying to keep the price down id be in only $130 on the mako

>>57089683
Is that a cocaine 9000?

>>57089320
>What's wrong with ETA

>>57084073

>>57089437
Double fuck off. Specifically to /k/.

File: 1439416640106.jpg (32KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x450px

>>57090725
Yeah guys, stop triggering anon

File: 91RxdL1efiL._SL1500_.jpg (200KB, 894x1500px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 894x1500px

I'm looking for a nice watch to wear to gym and I've got my eye the this Gshock. Should I grab it or do you guys recommend something else?

>>57090830
That's fine. Although personally I'd go watchless at the gym.

whats the best daily watch I can buy for <=150USD.

I'm talking something decent, water proof, and can take some dings here and there.

Would a bambino be a good option? or a seiko?

File: Screenshot_2016-01-08-12-04-29-1.png (1MB, 1440x1867px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x1867px

>>57090970

>>57089725
Your job should be financing it. If you can't pay cash then there are more important things to spend money on.

File: 29037242882_f1544bcd37_z.jpg (107KB, 640x512px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 640x512px

daily driver.

got a scratch on the cyclops now.

>>57087469
Keep the nice bracelet m8.

I'm 20 and im looking for a cheap watch, I don't want to impress anybody but I don't want to be laughed at, I wouldn't even mind buying a knockoff. Does anyone have any recommendations?

I like how russian watches look: https://www.amazon.com/Vostok-Komandirskie-Military-Submarine-431289/dp/B00TMAWKYI/ref=sr_1_1?s=apparel&ie=UTF8&qid=1476574413&sr=1-1&nodeID=6358540011&keywords=russian+watch

>>57091549
A good knockoff will run you a few hundred dollars. Vostok is nice. Otherwise, Seiko, orient, Casio, Timex, and Citizen all have some nice models below $100.

>>57091549
knockoffs get you laughed at

>>57091082

Did you expect it to remain in pristine condition forever?

>>57091955
yes

File: IMG_20161002_140908_BURST1.jpg (3MB, 4608x2592px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4608x2592px

recent purchase

File: 6R83ZhKh.jpg (86KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 768x1024px

Newbie here. I got this watch as a gift, but notice that the sub dial for the chronograph hours is misalign by like 1 mm. Its bothering me a lot. Is it possible to fix it by just turning the knob or should i return it and get a diff model? For reference its the AR 6009, do not know if that will change anything.

File: maxresdefault[1].jpg (181KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1920x1080px

What would be a nice, affordable skeleton watch aside from the Sea-Gull M182SK and its god damned CHINA MADE almost flashing in neon written right in the fucking dial?

File: 150211_409_attachment.jpg (79KB, 1024x685px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 1024x685px

Im about to pull the trigger on a Damasko DA 38 black. I want to put it on a NATO like the picture.

Any other watches I should consider before committing?

Anything wrong with winding the watch while it's changing date?

Between 8pm and 2am

File: 20150505_143117.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>57092199
Pull the crown out to the third position (the one you use to set the hour and minute hands) and try pressing the start/stop and reset pushers while its in that position. This should allow you to change the "reset" position of the chronograph hour and minute hands. If that doesn't work, try the same thing with the crown in the second position (date quickset position).

>>57092774
Nah not really, it'll just speed up the date change process and go over to the next date as if time itself was faster. My thickodate's day/date changes exactly at midnight whether it gets there by itself or I'm handwinding it

File: 1420871945671.jpg (2MB, 2448x3264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2448x3264px

>>57092774
Nothing wrong with winding while the date is changing. The classic wisdom is to not use the quickset while the date is changing. This is a good idea, as it can potentially damage different parts of the date mechanism. However, most decent movements make it impossible to damage anything this way, but its still a good idea to avoid it.

I'm not into watches at all, but I'm a college student and I wear this around basically every day: https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005JVP0LE/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Does this scream autism? I never really thought about it before looking at these watches.

>>57093153
hell no man
if it's just for wearing every day it's perfectly fine.
But if you want to "dress to impress", not only others but yourself, you can consider some of the cheaper watches ITT

File: watches guide.png (4MB, 1600x4200px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1600x4200px

>>57093153
It doesn't scream autism, but it screams cheap plastic. You could do much worse, but you could also do a lot better than that. I know life as a college student isn't the most lavish experience, but if you could spare anywhere between fifty bucks up to two hundred you'd get something a lot nicer.

Check the guide.

I have small wrist, whats a good recommendation for under 200usd?

>>57093309
How small? 37mm Seiko 5 is pretty universally wearable.

>>57093315
Hi there!

You seem to have made a bit of a mistake in your post. Luckily, the users of 4chan are always willing to help you clear this problem right up! You appear to have used a tripcode when posting, but your identity has nothing at all to do with the conversation! Whoops! You should always remember to stop using your tripcode when the thread it was used for is gone, unless another one is started! Posting with a tripcode when it isn't necessary is poor form. You should always try to post anonymously, unless your identity is absolutely vital to the post that you're making!

Now, there's no need to thank me - I'm just doing my bit to help you get used to the anonymous image-board culture!

Where do you even buy a Hamilton intra matic for a good price brand new?
Don't trust places like jomashop

File: 4L_K8kJ2CYm.jpg (1MB, 3092x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3092x2448px

>>57083160
love mine

File: ssc095p1_2_2_1_2.jpg (110KB, 1100x1100px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1100x1100px

>>57093315
My wrist is about 6inch all around circumference. 2inches barely measured straight length.

I was thinking avout the Seiko SSC095, but im not sure how big it is.

>>57093877
It's 42mm

I personally don't like to wear anything over 42mm, and my wrist is around 7.3 inches. I really like 38-40 for the most part on me for sports watches.

>>57089354
Not if you plan on posting dogshit Rugers.

>>57093990
shots fired

What are the best in house movement watches under $5000

So did these guys go out of business?

http://halioswatches.com/

Latest blog posts are from 2012 and all the watches show as sold out

Nomos for sure.

Hell get 2 for 5k.

>>57081581
>tfw probably have to wait until 2030 for a re-release of this
>people will be bitching about the turtle being discontinued

Are there any watches that only have chronographs? (i.e. don't tell time)

>>57094451
probably. why?

What are the best luxury digital watches? (Not a fucking smartwatch)

>>57094072
Vostok.

File: commiegraph.jpg (387KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1440x2560px

>>57094451
yes

>>57084073
Does the Selita sw200 have the same problem?

>>57094451
A stopwatch.

File: DSC_0086 (1).jpg (1MB, 2406x1600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2406x1600px

Well since everyone has their gatz out...

>>57083357
No SRP777? Really anontard?

>>57091082
>not getting a no date sub

>>57084931
NEVER LET A SEMEN DEMON choose, or even suggest aa watch for you. Fuck them and their inabilities to choose a quality item. It's always bling with those bitches. Never quality.

Godfukkendamn, I am so lucky not having to haul an airhead with a slit along with me, at this moment in time.

File: TW2P62200.png (165KB, 433x520px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 433x520px

Is this a good entry-level watch? I was thinking of throwing a Maratac strap on it.

File: 46806.jpg (59KB, 240x320px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 240x320px

>>57086514
Heh, you got butt fucked in Oregon. It's like Brokeback Mountain Watch - Teh Movie, where a man gets fucked over by a watchmaker who is about to be... out of business.

>>57088661
Because no one wants to work on fakes.

>>57089786
Words to live by, smartanon. Some of these retards should tattoo them on their foreheads.

File: A.-Lange-Sohne-Zeitwerk-Striking-Time-White-Gold-Black-Dial-Full-review-2.jpg (179KB, 1500x994px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1500x994px

>>57094469
There's only one choice really.

>>57092199
You didn't get that as a gift, you bought it despite everyone here telling you not to
Fuck off

File: Screen Shot 2016-10-15 at 9.31.14 PM.jpg (696KB, 2868x1538px) Image search: [Google]

696KB, 2868x1538px

My first vintage, kinda excited. If I somehow don't like it I can always take good pics and talk in the description like I am some sort of watch expert and sell it for a profit.

File: 1475557489658.jpg (40KB, 354x416px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 354x416px

>>57094569
>gatz
Who do you think you are, a looper??? Or a nigger? Back to homework, fucktard!

>>57094569
>>57080880
>no serial
>weird looking sights
This is what a Glock sight is supposed to look like, nice airsoft though.

>>57094881
Sights can be changed

>>57094797
>implying someone isn't going to snipe it

>>57094713
Um that was literally my first post here. Be angry somewhere else.

File: IMG_2647.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

Alpinist lume

File: DSC_9850[1].jpg (459KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 1800x1200px

>>57094881
do you even

File: IMG_2643.jpg (1MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4032x3024px

>>57093990
Remington 870 alright with you then?

File: 7M4dEqX.jpg (230KB, 1024x678px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1024x678px

Why is the Pelagos substantially more expensive than the Black Bay? Is it worth the price increase?

>>57095103
ceramic lumed bezel
date
titanium case
that fancy bracelet clasp
He escape valve that most no one will ever have a need for
500m

File: Tudor-Black-Bay-Bronze-watch-19.jpg (250KB, 859x630px) Image search: [Google]

250KB, 859x630px

>>57095103
It has more features, like helium release and is 500m instead of the BB's 200m, that being said this BB is more expensive IIRC. Also this guy shaves his arm hair...

>>57093784
That's a fantastic picture. Did you take it yourself? Looks better than all the other ones I saw being used as its advertisements.

The watch itself is amazing, too. The only thing missing for me to call it perfect is a day of the week complication. I'm the kind of person that always turns to a classmate and asks "is today Wednesday or Thursday?", so that'd be one feature I'd really like to have, though my phone works just as well.

>>57095045
What model?

>>57095846
sarb017

File: hitchchock-noose.jpg (12KB, 350x296px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 350x296px

>>57091549
>I wouldn't even mind buying a knockoff.
Here's a suggestion for you.

File: 20160829_091859.jpg (1MB, 2120x1679px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2120x1679px

>>57089354

>>57086939
yeah just push the bars out and change it

Am I less of a man if I were to buy the Speedy Reduced over a Pro? I don't really like the penis 12 O'Clock on the dial.

>>57096159
>Pulsar
>blank firing
Oh boy. At least it's not a chink Ebay Special and airshit.

>>57092759
Look at Sinn too I supposed.
Damasko are nice. The black coating is good and things like the offset day and date show that they care about details. I'd say go for it.
Also, try to get a nato with black hardware.

>>57096224
WITH Your lack of knowledge you I doubt you can tell the difference between a real gun and a fake one.

>>57094072
I really like Nomos myself.

>>57096239
That does look nice, how much? Not that I will be getting one, currently saving up for a Sub no-date.

>>57094140
Just by reading a couple words on the homepage, I managed to find that their latest Instagram post is 1 day old. Can't you read anon?

>>57096246
You mean that piece of trash is live? Christ anon, was it made by HMT?

>>57094469
G-shock MR-G I suppose.
Or Zeitwerk, which is an oddball.

>>57094618
Sure. The black coating won't last long though.

>>57096266
I am a different anon, just pointing out that you have no idea what you are talking about.

>>57081573
Must be a bitch to spend that much on a watch only to find out that it doesn't fit on your wrist.

>>57096317
Alright then. How am I wrong?

>>57096261
They are $1300 US.

>>57096533
IDK you tell me.

>>57096266
It is a blank firer and it is shit. I live in Britbongistan so that's the best I can get, I think even that might be illegal now.

I got it in case there's a home intruder as in the dark they'll just see what appears to be a huge revolver pointed at them and the blank going off should make them shit themselves enough to run away.

File: IMG_3936.jpg (161KB, 742x1036px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 742x1036px

Would you /wt/? What be a good price for this?

File: watches.jpg (349KB, 1914x638px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 1914x638px

Hey guys, is a movement with hack and handwind functions that much superior to one without?

I'm trying to decide between basically these 5 Orient models, and while the Bambino V2 1st Gen is my favorite because of its gold/black color palette, it has only a 48743 movement, while the new V2 2nd Gen has a F6722 movement (with hack/handwind), but it no longer has the black/gold palette.

Basically:

Bambino V2 G1
+Black dial with golden case and markers
+Looks fucking amazing
+Domed vintage-style glass
+Charming roman numbers
-48743 Movement (No hack, no handwind)
-Mineral glass
-Closed heart, closed back

Bambino V2 G2
+F6722 Movement (hack & handwind)
+Charming roman numbers
-Black dial only available with silver case and markers
+/- I could get used to the cream dial with brass markers, but it's not my favorite
-Why the fuck did you have to take black/gold away fucking Orient fuck
-Mineral glass
-Closed heart, closed back

Bambino V1 G2
+F6722 Movement (hack & handwind)
+Black dial with golden crown and accents
-Less elaborate dial
-White elements in dial don't fit as nicely as in V2s uniform color palette
-Date window has a fucking white box around it
-No charming roman numbers

Eminence
+Sapphire glass
+Open heart and back
+Black dial with golden case and markers
-48D40 Movement (No hack, no handwind)
-Not as pretty as the Bambino V2
-Straight, rectangular markers not as good-looking as triangles or roman numbers
-No charming roman numbers

>>57096753
Looks like the Seiko Monster's uglier cousin. Colors don't match at all. Red and green together? The two most contrasting colors in color theory? Who was the imbecile behind this decision?

File: IMG_3917.jpg (1MB, 2742x2229px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2742x2229px

>>57096813
To me hacking is essential, because it bothers me that my watch could run out of power if I haven't shaken it enough right after wearing it.
Hacking is nice but not that important imo.
that's why entry level Citizen/Miyota movements > entry level Seiko & Orient movements

>>57096753
looks like shit. Why would you do that?

>>57096851
>it bothers me that my watch could run out of power if I haven't shaken it enough right after wearing it.
That does sound like it could grow to be very annoying.

Do you know any watches with entry level Citizen/Miyota movements with the same visual style as the ones I posted? I'm still open to options, and these actually are under my maximum budget, so I could splurge a little more if needed.

Swiss movements are welcome too, although I've heard a bad story or two about entry level ETAs.

The only requirement is that I want a vintage look. Gold/black Bambino V2 was the closest to what I want that I've seen so far, for reference.

>>57096813
>Hey guys, is a movement with hack and handwind functions that much superior to one without?
You may like those features, but no, there's nothing that makes it superior really.

Keep in mind, fake gold or gold plated watches can have their gold come off, and they will look bad when they do that. I'm not sure how well those Bambinos hold up, but personally I just never bother with that kinda stuff.

>>57096813
>Hey guys, is a movement with hack and handwind functions that much superior to one without?
Those movements aren't going to be that accurate anyway, so I don't expect to be able to tell time by the second. So to me hacking isn't that useful. I use the seconds hand as a function indicator or timer only.
Handwinding is nice to have if you have several watches. If it's your only, daily watch, then it's not that essential.

>>57096892
Oh, and I also like metal link straps more than leather ones in general, but the Bambino probably looks better in leather than it would with a metal strap.

>>57096902
I just like the gold look. I would buy a solid gold one if I could afford it right now, but I can't. Maybe in a few years, after I graduate.

Who even needs a watch anymore
Hahaha nigga just use ur iphone

>>57096938
if you said apple watch or fitbit you would have a point. being able to check the time without taking my phone out of my pocket is really convenient.

>>57096920
Do you have to pick it up in the morning and shake it like you're trying to make a cocktail so it keeps working?

>>57096963
I usually just put it on when leaving home and proceed to set the time when I arrive at work.

>>57096963
They have a 40 hour power reserve and use the Seiko winding system, which is very efficient.

The only time you might want to shake it is if you've let it fully wind down and are putting it back on. But generally if you put it on first thing in the morning it would be wound up enough to set and forget by the time you're ready to get in the car.

>>57096985
Also, for anyone new who doesn't know about magic lever:

http://www.seiko-cleanenergy.com/watches/mechanical-1.html
(magic lever is on this page, you can click "see the magic lever at work" for a little animation.)

Magic lever was patented by seiko in the 50s and allowed the oscillating weight to wind the watch regardless of moving clockwise or counter-clockwise.

>>57096978
>>57096985
>>57097049
I see, thanks.

>>57097049
Do you know what methods other makers use to wind both ways?

>>57097080
Well, magic lever patent is expired. So one way is to just make a magic lever. So Swiss makers like TAG which have adopted base Seiko movements TC87 use a regular Seiko magic lever, while other makers use something like it.

For example, Swiss ETA movements, 2824 and other biderctional movements uses another wheel, a reverse wheel. Other ETA movements like 7750 only wind in one direction, not two.

Other manufacturers, with in house movements, may have more novel or complex winding methods. like IWC pellaton

>>57096851
Fuck I wanted to say manual winding instead of hacking at the beginning.
Hope you got my point anyway.

>>57097172
Interesting. The magic lever seems like a more elegant solution than a reversing wheel.

Some links for those who are also interested in this:
IWC pellaton winding system model : http://people.timezone.com/msandler/Pellaton/Review.html
diagrams of the reversing wheels in a 2824: http://forums.watchuseek.com/f77/bi-directional-self-winding-mechanism-eta2824-seiko-7s26-others-815374.html

File: sndd87p1-2.jpg (42KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 600x450px

Can anyone please recommend my something similar to this? Can't find this particular model anywhere.

>black dial, silver body
>chronograph
>tachymeter
>no numerals
> <$500
Gold/yellow accent not required

>>57097392
the tacky-meter is off the charts

>>57097398
That is tacky as fuck. Would've looked a lot less gaudy if the strap was black.

>>57097248
I understood it by the context, no worries senpai.

>>57097172
Is this another case where the Jap steals a Swiss invention and claim it as their own?

File: Zahnradwechsler.jpg (53KB, 570x307px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 570x307px

>>57097586
Felsa made the first bidirectional, in Switzerland, but it is not similar to the magic lever. Magic lever is Seiko's to claim.

What's a good upgrade for the Seiko SKX007? Has to be a diver and I'm willing to spend up to $5,000.

>>57098110
SBDX017

>>57098110
There's a SBGA029 on WUS up for sale I believe

File: 4L_ZT2h6aX8.jpg (134KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 640x640px

>>57098110

File: awsdfghjkl.jpg (357KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1920x1440px

certina ds podium. this is ma first post to 4chan

File: 4L_16YctJDc.jpg (49KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 480x480px

>>57095638
Yes, 6+ camera with near-sunset lighting. I am thinking of swapping the strap to a perlon or graphic nato like this:
(hellonatostrap)

>>57098655
That Japanese wave pattern is a bit girly, don't you think?

>>57098654
Run away while you can, anon. 4chan is a waste of time unless you are a neet.

File: 4L_JDFOa3cx.jpg (301KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 1024x1024px

>>57095638
Or this, from cheapestnatostraps:

I forgot to mention that shots on the watch shop websites always look like shit which is why I look for user-made photos on google images or watch forums, images that actually sell the watch on its appearance, like mine. I think they purposefully understate them to lower expectations.

>>57096902
It's not coated, the steel itself is colored

>>57098688
Not at all, I think it's quite nice

>>57098854
Nice anal beads

>>57098869
not my photo, was looking for a bambino with perlon

>>57098655
Unless you're going for a beige/olive or any other such vintage-looking color, I don't think it's gonna work. That blue, patterned NATO is too fresh and modern for the look of the watch, it's gonna contrast very heavily and I don't think it'll do that in a good way.

Unless you're going for the "I own a sailboat" look with something like a pale blue button-down short-sleeved shirt, khaki shorts and brown leather loafers/boat shoes. That could work.

>>57098854
Is yours a 1st or 2nd gen V2? That is, is it using the old 48743 or the new F6722 movement? Any comments on the movement quality/accuracy, like how many seconds fast or late it grows over a day or week?

File: 20161015_153839.jpg (2MB, 3096x4128px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3096x4128px

>>57082523
>>57082805
Updated collection pic after selling the 6206 and putting both the Dugena and SKX on sale.

Though i'm wondering, for an SKX with perfect aligment and a super oyster bracelet, would 210$ shipped be too much?

Also, our postal services during the holidays literally don't exist. Both of the Poljots likely made their way by now and have been stuck in the post office for a week or two.

File: 4L_OsyICppC.png (144KB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1242x2208px

>>57099204
I don't dress too far from that anyway; I'll just buy both

>>57099274
first gen, need to get it adjusted
fun fact: this app uses the microphone to listen to the escapement and can even find the frequency of the movement

>>57099373
Chère do you sell your watches, ebay?

>>57099566
/f29/

Usually a lot easier on very popular models, instant payment, plus less fees.

Though if i'd put said SKX on eBay it'll go rather quickly.

>>57099411
Got an Android equivalent to it?

File: IMG_20160829_121915.jpg (129KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 720x720px

If I were to sell my penis quartz how much do you think I could get for it /wt/?

>>57099603
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.diversminds.hairspring

The Android version seems to have bad reviews, but I can't read them on the shitty website.

File: certina-ds-podium-automatic-chronograph-men_s-watch-c0014271629700.jpg (441KB, 900x900px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 900x900px

>>57098654
Certina is a decent brand, like a cheap tissot, their automatic chronos are one of the cheapest swiss ones you can buy, around 600$ on a bracelet.

>>57099599
what is /f29/?

>>57099986
Bing it, it's a wus section.

>>57099674
Apparently the app doesn't even run/crashes on startup for a lot of people although it seems like those for whom it worked were satisfied, judging by their reviews.

>>57100209

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.uhrenbastler.watchcheck

>>57098125
I like how this looks but its 44mm diameter may be a tad too big for my wrist.

>>57098602
Too tall.

>>57098451
This looks interesting but it looks like a Submariner rip-off.

>>57099411
What's the name of this app? Is it free?

>>57100668
Hairspring, yes, with iAP (I liked the app so I supported the dev)

File: DSC_0004.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

Got this one today.

>>57100761
>iAP
What's that?

The app seems to be 4,99€ on the AppStore but if you say it's worth it I will consider it, I've been looking for something like this for a long time but none of the related apps have feedback.

>>57101119
oh, I guess it's not. It's worth it if you like this kind of thing, I thought it was cool. But it's useless if you don't care about accuracy.

>>57100381
Just get a Pelagos like any sane person would. It's miles better than any Seiko diver in the same price range.

>>57082947
>he thinks he can even slightly impress non watch people with a watch
My two tone date just impresses non watch people often

>>57101577
I'm pretty autistic with accuracy and spend a lot of time checking it on my watches to regulate them. With this app I guess I won't need to wait a whole day to check the accuracy,m? Since it tells you about if it's running +-X seconds/day instantly, right?

>>57102464
It takes 30s minimum, but you can change to 1/2/3 min for better accuracy

Also, the room has to be dead silent or the measurement will fluctuate a lot, about 3s

>>57102464
just get a timegrapher

File: RDDBEX0425.jpg (58KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 800x800px

How much would you pay for this?

What is your upper price limit for a watch?

File: chiappa_rhino_mechanism.jpg (2MB, 3663x2535px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3663x2535px

>>57089354
Are these pretty much the only two complex machinery in our modern everyday life that have absolutely zero transistors in them? A memenical and a firearm?

>>57102721
No argument - the watch is a bit of an abomination - but it actually looks better than you'd expect in person and on the wrist, especially compared to other industrial looking watches like Hublot or Armin Strom.

Not that I'd pay the $481k or whatever it was.

File: ^46047902A30D967308AACAD6EEBE176B763B53C392D38D041B^pimgpsh_fullsize_distr.jpg (121KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 800x600px

>>57102800
yep, defenitely an interesting abomination in person kek.

>>57102733
There's gotta be some gas powered stuff that's still new that's basically fully mechanical.

Lawn mowers, maybe?

>>57084326
>This is why there has been little to no substantive improvement in the accuracy, shock resistance, ease of regulation, correcting of design flaws (like hand winding on the ETA 2824-2), or lengthening of service intervals based on materials engineering.
The MEMS industry will destroy ETA et al. it is as if the Swiss never learned a thing from the Quartz crisis.

New thread? Auto sage is on.

>>57102932
I wouldn't be surprised if they had some basic electronic engine control. Gas-powered lawn-mowers aren't exactly poorfag chinkshit.

>>57103053
I dunno. Maybe I haven't looked at mowers in a while, but something with a pull start is probably not going to have anything electronically controlled.

>>57103021
>Auto sage is on.

Reee. It's a bump limit.

>>57088501
Shit you're right. I hate rolex too because somewhere there is an ugly replica?
You're stupid m8

>>57102721
$25

>>57094072
Rolex (the watches themselves in steel go for around $5000+/- as long as you dont make a terrible investment on previous metals/gems on rolex)

>>57094605
Too true anon. I love the puss too much tho.

File: KIMG0018.jpg (4MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3264x2448px

Addicted to humorously cheap tacticool ani-digital watches

>>57102721
Is that a fucking quad-tourbillon? Is something like this even possible?

File: 1474100665357.jpg (54KB, 546x896px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 546x896px

Is it weird to not like a watch simply because i do not like the logo? Does that make me superficial.

>>57104668
Logo is important. The Rolex crown indicates you eiter bought a fake or is going through a mid life crisis. Already certain luxury goods brands are buried in fakes that nobody believes it is real when they see one.

>>57099373
why dont you sell all of those and get something good