kek

File: Guru3D_gpu_shootout.png (63KB, 682x982px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 682x982px

Just to compare.

>>57069782
Why do you guys care? Do you even play games or do you just run benchmarks all day?

Sometimes I think people here don't even have the cards and are just bored.

>>57069782
I have my gtx 1060 on 2100 mhz. Would it run as fast as a 980ti?

File: 1463048382393.png (35KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 653x726px

DELET

>>57069804
>No fun allowed

>>57069818
How is this fun??

Isn't the point to play your games?

>>57069801
>MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Gaming Z above MSI GeForce GTX 1070 Gaming X
NOOOO DELETE THIS

http://hothardware.com/news/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1050-ti-benchmarks-leak

>>57069825
I have more fun watching the fireworks on /g/ threads.

File: 1472414350264.jpg (559KB, 1100x1002px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 1100x1002px

fuck off n/v/idiot this is AMD board
leave my safe space

>>57069886
Implying apus are good. Apu is an indian name, btfo poojeet

>>57069782
>4gb ram
>While the 1060 has 3
What the fuck, nvidia?

>>57069782
dx11
>>57069801
dx12 and shit

fuck off cuck

>>57070033
The non-Ti edition will have 2.

>>57069886
>calls nvidia pajeet
>amd is literally run by pajeet


oh the amdautismos

File: apu-head.png (556KB, 959x575px) Image search: [Google]

556KB, 959x575px

>>57069886
>amd apu

File: untitled-2 (1).png (40KB, 675x985px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 675x985px

>synthetics
name one game where a gtx1060 beats a r9 fury

>>57069801
That DX12 Time Spy test isn't DX12.

>>57070350
There'll be some Gameworks game where it does and then you'll shift the goalposts.

>>57070359
It will be extremely hard to make a fair and accurate DX12 benchmark because that would require games developers to equally optimize for both vendors, and they won't.

TimeSpy does use Async pipelines though, so it is DX12 in that regard.

File: Witcher_02.png (73KB, 1304x1616px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 1304x1616px

>>57070366
maybe there is, but that's the exception, not the norm

synthetics are trash and don't represent actual gaming performance accurately

>comfortably above 280x
I am ok with that
I feared it would be gtx960 level

>>57070436
>maybe there is, but that's the exception, not the norm
Moving the goalposts before even one game was found.
>name one game where a gtx1060 beats a r9 fury

>>57070493
post the game then, friendo

>>57070531
Not him but I don't even need to look up Project CARS to know "one game." Still, fuck Nvidia.

>>57069782
>>57069801
>3D Mark
The Way It's Meant To Be Benchmarked™

>>57069782
so it's basically a faster 770 with a full 4gb vram for piss cheap?

i'm ok with this. the 770 was and still is a good card for 1080p if you're on a budget.