shit software thread.

>>57056774
Is this the birth of an epic new meme?

File: slow_snail.jpg (225KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 600x450px

>>57056781
The meme here is firefox.

These tests were done on a Skylake Xeon, 16GB of RAM and a PCI-Express SSD. e10s enabled and dom.ipc.processCount set to 50. Now tell me Firefox isn't slow:

>FF vs Chrome - 30 Random sites
https://webmshare.com/play/KBm8v
>FF vs Chrome - 11 News sites
https://webmshare.com/play/Meo8O
>FF vs Chrome - 40+ Instagram profiles on Windows
https://webmshare.com/play/Wn1GD
>FF vs Chrome - 40+ Instagram profiles on Arch Linux
https://webmshare.com/play/6wK0n
>FF vs Chrome on bad machine (2core/2thread - 2GB RAM)
https://webmshare.com/play/gBdJb
>FF vs Chrome with uBlock
https://webmshare.com/play/RAE86

>Vivaldi vs Opera vs Chrome
https://webmshare.com/play/LX38L

I've never understood why Firefox was /g/entoo approved. Go get Iridium and call it a fucking day.

>>57056839
>german botnet
How about nah. ungoogled-chromium or bust

>>57056828
firefox BTFO

File: file.png (16KB, 600x300px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 600x300px

>>57056847
>sjw botnet

>>57056774
>>57056828
You don't even get paid for your disinfo shilling. How the fuck do you find such a great motivation?

>>57056878
>get presented hard evidence
>m-muh disinfo

>>57056828
furfaggots btfo

>>57056897
That's not a hard evidence

>>57056878
>>57056828
good luck giving all your information to google dumbass

firefox now has a small enough userbase that it's not as profitable to exploit. you'd be crazy not to use it

>Smoother than Chrome
>Supeior font rendering and image rendering at 150% scaling on Windows 10, fuck fuzzy text and images
>Just werks

also, there's nothing like noscript for chrome

>>57056958
Smoother how? Just werks how? Those aren't arguments. The font rendering I agree with, Chrome is blurry as fuck

>>57056917
LOL

C'mon man, firefox stopped being good when they made that anti-fag CEO step down because he didn't conform to SJW views.

>>57056973
>Chrome forces pre loading pages and make them look sluggish
>Just werks means you install it, install uBlock Origins and you are ready to go

>>57056982

>w-why do people have different opinions than me!

That's not a technical argument.

>>57056967
umatrix is better than noscript

>>57056999

i use both, but noscript is easier and has some good extra features besides script blocking

>>57056982
>C'mon man

Software isn't shit because you can't find a girl /pol/.

File: 1466892247887.png (56KB, 572x282px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 572x282px

>It's that tryhard vivaldi shill again

Sorry OP take your closed source garbage to /v/

File: 1466378011917.jpg (15KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 320x320px

>>57056774
Will these marketing threads ever end?

They're so fucking annoying and don't accomplish anything.

File: 1476202162393.jpg (625KB, 1440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

625KB, 1440x1440px

>>57056937
I bet you have a Facebook account.

Enjoy your botnet

Firefox all day err day

>>57056991
Preloading can be disabled, in fact it comes disabled in ungoogled-chromium, and I don't know what you mean by "make them look sluggish". And your definition of just werks applies to chromium too.

chrome can't automatically clear browsing data on shutdown without an extension. chrome can't have a blank homepage, or a blank new tab. chrome is shite.

>>57056839
I use both.
Firefox is barely any slower (I won't lie and say they are the same), but chrome has almost no good extensions/customization options.

>>57057151
>Preloading can be disabled, in fact it comes disabled in ungoogled-chromium
HOW

File: image.webm (113KB, 1080x1445px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1080x1445px

>>57057175
see webm related

>>57057224
related to what?

whats wrong with firefox?

>>57057251
everything

see >>57056828

>>57057224
Is this really even smaller than a jpg?
113kb for a WebM like this seems a bit much.

>>57057271
I believe the point in this case is that iPhone users can't open webms, at least not with Safari

So after reading and watching OP stuff, is Vivaldi better than firefox and chrome?

>>57057289
>Closed source
No

>>57057304
which is the best choice then?

>>57057280
Why would they want to? It's a shit format. If you wanna share videos, just use mp4 with H.264 + AAC.

>>57057307
ungoogled-chromium

File: 1468857219930.gif (16KB, 395x401px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 395x401px

>>57057289
>not open source

into the trash

>>57057307
Firefox dev or nightly. If you're on really old shitty hardware use pale moon.
For some reason if you insist on using chrome based browsers, then go with iridium.

>>57057304
>closed source is bad
Is this a new meme?

>>57057328
>New
No

>>57057313
OK

>>57057307

firefox esr

>>57057333
>use badly supported shit formats
>LMAO IT'S THE END-USER'S FAULT

File: gnulinux-logo.png (81KB, 758x435px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 758x435px

>>57056774

>>57057346
How is open source a "shit format"?

>>57057367

How is the license terms of the reference implementation for a format the official primary criterion for how good it is?

so what browser should i be using then ?

>>57057386
>>57057314

>>57057386
Just use chrome like a normal human being.

>>57057386

You shouldn't be browsing the web if you don't have a three-digit IQ.

>>57057386
>>57057319

>>57056774
If you don't use firefox and you use Chrome you really shouldn't be browsing on 4chan.
Google probably has added you to a list of racists.

how can i transfer all my bookmarks from one browser to the other ?

>>57057473
Every browser has an "import bookmarks and history" feature.

>>57056828
SJWzilla on full damage control!

>>57057319

so is nightly and iridium more secure privacy wise or are they just faster ?

>>57057554
Iridium and Firefox are probably around the same since they both are completely open and privacy centric.
Nightly/dev are nice just because they are a bit faster and also have more settings/options you can edit under the hood.

>>57056774
All of them is botnet. Now get a job.
https://careers.mozilla.org/