DiskMark Thread?

File: CDM.png (39KB, 402x367px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 402x367px

>>57033437
don't think I can but here
kingston hyperx savage 240g

File: PepeDiskMark for GNU_087.png (43KB, 650x354px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 650x354px

9 year old laptop

File: RAMDisk (3200MHz DDR4 CL 16-18-18-38) 6-25-16.png (738KB, 799x525px) Image search: [Google]

738KB, 799x525px

My RAMDisk wins :^)

>>57034390
>2gb

kill yourself

>>57034586
I have 32GB in total, and I'm only using 4 of my 8 DIMM slots.

I can have up to 128GB installed if I want.

What does it matter the size I use to show a benchmark?

>>57034622
You're not booting off it, doofus.

>>57034694
>butthurt because he got beaten
kill yourself

>>57034622
Because the size you choose in diskmark will drastically affect the results you get you fucking idiot

File: image.jpg (2MB, 2338x1946px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2338x1946px

$170 for this am i cool hackerman now

>>57034883
>taking a photo with his phone instead of a screenshot
you really have to kill yourself, right now

File: best result so far.png (55KB, 416x378px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 416x378px

128gig Kingston HyperX 3k from 2012.

Did i get scammed?

>>57034861
... it's a 1GB fixed test size you literal moron, see the little drop down box that says "1GiB" that's the size of the benchmark file you're doing the test with, I could make with 30GB and I'd get the same results with a 1GB test.

>>57034909
You think I would actually post on 4chan using Windows 10? Ha you ignorant normie, you don't understand the botnet like i do.
Sent from my iPhone

>>57034883
Are you trying to Poe us or should you be sucking a shotgun?

Is it worth getting an ADATA, just for a small drive to boot off of?
What are some good ~$50 MLC SSDs?

File: image.jpg (118KB, 800x537px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 800x537px

>>57034934
u just got poe'd

>>57034988
>is it worth $50/it?
That's for you to decide

>>57034622
you're not "using" it, you're just testing your ram

we're talking about actual drives that people use

awesome speeds though, not even gonna hate

Why do HDDs and SSDs exist if RAM is so fast?

>>57035151
>what is non-volatile memory

>>57035151
Because RAM disks aren't persistent?

>>57035173
>>57035183
which is the answer to >>57034622

>>57035115
Except I use my RAMDisk, in that instance, yes I was just benchmarking, but I use it all the time as a cache for temporary internet files instead of using my C:\ drive
>>57035183
Almost all RAMDisk software I use allows you to setup automatic backups of the RAMDisk that are reloaded upon reboot. The software I use allows for 30 seconds, 1 minute, 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hour backups.

I generally use 30 minutes for the auto backups, and it can also be set to backup upon shutdown, obviously with an unexpected loss of power you'd lose whatever wasn't in there from the last backup, but my UPS has 25-35 minute of run time, so unless the power outage happens within 3-5 minutes of my last backup, I wont lose anything, and even if it does happen right then, I still have 20 minutes I can manually backup and shut everything down before the UPS battery dies.

File: image.png (97KB, 201x201px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 201x201px

>>57035277
>He actually paid for a 30min UPS
Next you're gonna tell me its biggest use is for your ramdisk backups because your "hard drive" resets every time you turn off your computer

>>57035307
Wut...

I have a UPS because I get power outages every few weeks, they are usually just quick outages, 10 seconds at the most generally. It would be stupid to have $2,000+ in electronics NOT hooked up to a UPS in these circumstances.

Especially if you do work on the computer regularly where a power outage could cost you some serious time, if the power goes out when i'm doing an encode overnight, i'd really prefer the encode can continue on uninterrupted just because there was a 10 second power failure. With a UPS I have no worries.

It lasting that long is just an advantage and the timing works out great for my RAMDisk backups.

File: KEK.png (35KB, 402x367px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 402x367px

>>57033437

File: ssd.png (37KB, 406x369px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 406x369px

Pic related, 950 pro

>>57035277
>>57035357
i'm op, that's pretty cool though. i never went full autist with ramdisks but that's pretty neat

you do like video production work or something?

>>57035421
>you do like video production work or something?
Yup, though I'm starting to work with larger and larger 4k projects, so I either need to get a larger M.2 SSD for scratch space, or invest in more RAM and use a RAMDisk for it.

I'll probably go for the M.2 route though.

>>57035434
damn nice

yeah i use this

https://amzn.com/B00UHJJQ3Q

you might want something like that

File: 1475623095100.jpg (707KB, 2576x1936px) Image search: [Google]

707KB, 2576x1936px

pfff. Make virtual partition in RAM, get 18000mbs. Stupid retards.

File: 2016-10-11.png (79KB, 602x548px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 602x548px

>>57033437
950 pro

>>57035446
Yeah I was looking at those, but I was also looking at the Samsung 960 Pro, only $300 more than that intel but with 2TB instead of 1.2TB, and 3200MB/s read speeds with 2100MB/s write speeds, 440k random read IOPS, 360k random write IOPS, etc etc.


Either way it will probably be a few months before I bite the bullet unless I get a project that forces me to upgrade or something.

>>57035417
I wanted to get that but got this >>57034883
I'm kinda jelly but good thing I probably wouldn't notice it

>>57035499
damn, but it's m.2

idk why but i hate this meme format

>>57035552
It's literally identical to PCIex4, it's the same bus. Just a horizontal slot instead of vertical.

>>57035552
A horizontal small peripheral PCIe x4 and sata slot is no meme

File: onegibibiyte.png (46KB, 425x385px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 425x385px

>>57033437
this is my laptop

>>57033437
What's a good linux alternative?

>>57035594
WTF kind of drive are you using to get these reading speeds?

>>57035713
2 samsung SM951s in raid0. I think you can find laptops that support pcie ssd raid for as low as $1300USD nowadays

>>57035778
>raid0
>ssds
kek, confirmed retard who doesn't understand how RAID works.

Or you do understand it and have convinced yourself that somehow you are actually able to take advantage of the increased speeds (you aren't)

>>57035798
nobody listen to this dumbass stupid highschool dropout retard

>>57035846
Then explain to me the advantages of running RAID 0 on SSDs where your internet speed isn't even close to approaching the write speed of a SINGLE of your SSDs, you aren't doing huge Database worksets where you need large fast storage, and you aren't working on RAW 4k video which might also require lots of storage space and very fast speeds.

So go ahead, i'll wait. Tell me what you think the advantage of using your SSDs in RAID0 is. I'll wait.

>>57035883
nobody listen to this stupid highschool dropout dumbass retard

>>57035883
>where your internet speed isn't even close to approaching the write speed of a SINGLE of your SSDs
WHO THE FUCK CARE ABOUT THE INTERNET SPEED, FUCK OFF RETARD

>>57035778
>raid on ssds
Who needs TRIM these days, anyway

>>57035883
nobody listen to this stupid highschool dropout dumbass retard

>>57035883
nobody listen to this stupid highschool dropout dumbass retard

File: Screen Shot 2016-10-12 at 9.48.20.png (2MB, 1370x1400px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1370x1400px

Apple wins.

>>57039629
In terms of what? Even my SATA III SSD writes faster than that

>>57039810
Show me.

>>57035972
>>57038457
>>57039159
Not an argument, samefag

File: Selection_577.png (13KB, 694x105px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 694x105px

>>57038270