FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING BTFO

File: 4f7b75a7-dc86-4d5d-a119-f202010e6a30.jpg (8KB, 199x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 199x200px

LMAO /g/ Haskell and Lisp fizzbuzzers on suicide watch, doctors have taken away their belts and shoelaces!

DELET THIS

>>57031447
NEVER

>>57031412
It's easy to reuse code when it's mostly boilerplate.

>>57031412

Wow this "study" from THIRTY FUCKING YEARS ago totally BTFO functional programming.

4/10 for triggering me and making me bite

>>57031412

Poo.Init();

>>57031633

This is racist.

>>57031698
Sorry.

>>57031709

I forgive you.

>>57031412
>"reuse 70% of code"
>public class XEntityControllerFactory implements FooBar
>public static abstract void
>SomeShit<Bar> = new SomeShit<Bar>

Probably all the OO bloat and redundancies that simply don't exist in purely functional languages.

I don't really know much about functional programming, but I bet you know nothing about either

>>57031854
No, I just want to list sources from 1989. I don't care about programming lol

>>57031854

Nobody really does know, it doesn't make any logical sense.

>>57031789

Maybe that's why functional programming became so successful and ubiquitous, right? Oh wait...

>>57031924
>Maybe that's why functional programming became so successful and ubiquitous, right? Oh wait...
C and Java are the most known programming languages. Javascript is the hip language. So eh.

>>57031924
mfw almost every language supports a large number of functional features out-of-box

gtfo

>>57032436
>mfw without greentext
>mfw without face
>all lowercase
Get out cancer

>>57032929
>How dare he do something completely irrelevant differently than what I'm accustomed to

OOP is the only way to have lots of marginally-skilled programmers work on the same project without it going to shit, so of course it's used more often.


functional programming is better though

>>57033022
>defending shitty, low quality posts
People like you are the reason why this site is getting worse every day

>>57032929
Do you even know what greentexting is actually for you insufferable faggot???

>>57033188
Yes, for posts like >mfw, among others.
>???
Lurk more, it's obvious that you're new

>>57031698
So?

>>57033066
>shitty, low quality posts
Like irrelevant comments on the color of text?

He actually made a really good point. Most modern programming languages do support functional programming in some form.

>>57033214
Are you 12? Nobody fucking cares mate. Especially online on anonymous image boards.

>>57031412
>1989
They didn't even know what programming was back then. Stop discrediting Karlie Kloss you racist cisgender BIGOT

>>57031431
>Lisp
Who still uses fucking Lisp of all languages? I used it to automate some stuff in AutoCAD and it was a pain in the ass to do anything with it.

>>57035206
Try when your IQ reaches over 10 next time.

>>57035206

Believe it or not, people still use AutoLisp.

I have to work in it every now and again.

I fucking hate this.

(((defun nofun)))))))))))

F# has OOP support for interop with .net, so we get the best of both worlds...

>>57031412

>When it comes to code reuse, projects that used an object-oriented approach were able to take more than 70% of their code from previous projects.

70% of object-oriented code is just

System.Class.import()

and

public static void extern class

etc.

>>57035550
Yeah, except you're on Windows, you fucking Pajeet!

>>57035725

Confirmed for never having coded OOP.

>>57031412
>oop is 70% cut and paste
>funcD is 35% cut and paste
sounds like the functional guys write at least twice as much original code.
op rekt

>>57036937
Cut and paste is not code reuse, you fucking moron. Geez, how to spot the beginner!

>>57037121
t. Pajeet

>>57038171

>cut and paste is code reuse
>only pajeets think otherwise

Oh boy, to what level has /g/ fallen?!?

>>57038297
>import OopPajeet.util.*
>/g/ is one guy
confirmed for Oracle Certified Associate

>>57031412
>were able to take more than 70% of their code from previous projects
kek, the way OOP bullshit works is that you want to take 10% and then need to pull in the other 60% to make it fucking work (libraries, parent classes, etc)

you want the banana, but end up with a monkey holding the banana surrounded by the entire fucking jungle

>>57031540
APPLY WATER TO BURNED AREA
HOW WILL OOPFAGS EVER RECOVER?

>>57038718
the fat paychecks help numb the pain

>>57036598
Try again you stupid try hard faggot, f# works on windows, mac and gnu+linux.

>>57035206

I... I like LISP.

File: bf6.jpg (22KB, 456x628px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 456x628px

>>57031412
Oh shit rekt. g2g, killing myself

>>57031412
As a C++ and JS programmer who doesn't like Lisp or Haskell, I'd like to say this proves nothing and isn't an argument.

OOP fag here:
Define 'reuse', because I've witnessed the following situation quite a few times:
>can we reuse that one package from last year's project?
>sure, what are it's dependencies?
>uhm... Just copy the whole project over... We can make it a library

If only they had written it in forth they could have done p cool stuff.