Is is going to be decent? At 1.8 GHz it should be halfway between a 960 and 970 for 75 watts.
nvidia poor fags are the worst
>>57014159
I need a low wattage card, so this is the best option. If AMD had a 90 watt 470 then I would consider that.
>>57014215
>low wattage card
Thanks for confirming you can't afford electricity and bed sheets.
>>57014296
>why don't you just buy more UPSes and plug them into each other what are you poor
How does this compare to the 1060 6gb?
>>57014111
>that hand
how fat are you?
>>57014601
Early reports indicate it's around a 960, which is half as powerful as a 980/1060. I hope the 1050 Ti will overclock a lot though.
>>57015944
I wish it came in between a 960 and 1060 with a price to match, and the regular 1050 was around the 960 mark.
But I guess that would need more kinds of chips and increased costs.
>>57016170
Actually, if the 1050 and 1050 Ti overclock to about 1.8GHz, the 1050 should rival the 960 and the 1050 Ti should be better.
>>57014215
460 is exactly that, m80
>>57014215
People greatly overestimate how much power 100-200 watts really are. Like a $15 dollar/year difference. Very overblown meme.
>>57016748
Yeah, except the 460 sucks. The 950 beats it.
>>57014215
According to Jayz2cents, the new XFX 480 manages to sit around 90w.
XFX GTR 480, NOT the standard 480.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWASNajSdpg
yo do you think this'll be a good option to egpu off a t420?