The porn armegeddon is coming - buy bigger hard drives

>>57011365
hexadecimal

>>57011365
Just kill me already

>>57011365
This is only in the UK and other middle eastern countries.

>>57012137
KEK

if you can't prevent children from accessing the adult-only material you are selling, you should have your license to sell it revoked. not sure why this is contentious--though i suspect most of the complaints are coming from underageb&

>>57012137
>This is only in the UK and other middle eastern countries
5/7

>>57011365
if i'm honest i think it's way too easy for kids nowadays to find hardcore shit
back in the day you had it much harder and you actually treasured those moments, now kids are totally addicted to that trash cause it's too easy

>>57012162
People give adult only material away for free. If you can't keep your children from going to certain places on the interwebs, you should have your license to parent revoked.

File: 1475587564048.png (333KB, 931x554px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 931x554px

>>57012195

>>57012204
Who gets in trouble if a man on the street gives cigarettes and alcohol to children for free? Tip: not the parents

>>57012226
My first drink of alcohol came from my neighbors and my first cigarette from my friends dad. If my parents knew about it, they would have gotten after me. You live in a nanny state.

I don't like how pornographic our culture has become but the simple fact is that kids shouldn't be on the fucking Internet to begin with

>>57012267
Yes, children will find ways to circumvent the restriction. That does not mean that vendors do no have to restrict access to restricted materials.

>>57012641
Selling to minors is different than giving it away for free.

>>57012683
Yes, it's a different crime. It's still illegal, though
http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/contributing-to-the-delinquency-of-a-minor.html

>>57012293

Exactly. They don't have the maturity to understand the kind of repercussions their actions could have. How many kids have ended up getting doxxed for being retards?

They don't understand that once it's online, it's there forever.

File: 61973.png (36KB, 740x260px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 740x260px

>>57011365
Please refrain from posting unoptimized PNGs.
Thank you.

>>57012775
someone make this a webm

>>57012775
>I'm going to waste bandwidth to show you how you're wasting bandwidth

File: Sigourney headbang.gif (285KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 200x200px

>>57013020
>what is pedagogy

>>57012162
So let me get this straight... Sexual content shouldn't be accessible by under 18 year olds.

Yet drinking is allowed and condoms are allowed for under 18 year olds.

Seems like the problem isn't blocking content from kids, its people treating kids like they are not people and therefor must be controlled. How about you declare that any law banning content from a person based on age violates the right to free speech.

>all this verification for porn
>all requiring some form of ID

Just have them solve a complicated math or science problem as a captcha.

>>57011365

If they implement any of this stuff, I'd just by a VPS and put open VPN on it no way I'm authenticating to view pornographic content.

>>57014750
Parents can give their children alcohol, but it is illegal to sell to minors. It's illegal to sell pornography to minors as well, but this isn't what people want. They want the government to parent their children.

>>57014854
It's illegal to show pornography to minors as well, and people want that to be enforced

>>57014854
Alcohol actually has a bad impact on your health when consumed at an early age.

What is the impact of pornography on children?

>>57014902
>What is the impact of pornography on children?
Impaired sexual/emotional development.

>>57014914
Bullshit. Sources please.

It's fine if someone under 18 watches porn, It's only illegal if some fuckin 20 year old sends porn to a underage person

>>57014914
So what?

Sounds like an issue natural selection takes care of.

They won't breed and thus won't propagate the problem.

>>57012137
hehe

>>57012226
>He fell for the le trench coat boogeyman meme
If your child did not learn to not accept "gifts" from strangers, maybe they are better off learning from the real world

>>57014902
>implying alcohol hasn't a bad impact on your health when consumed at an any age

>>57015014
>Sounds like an issue natural selection takes care of.
Do you civilisation, anon?
Natural selection doesn't work for many years.

>>57016381
>implying alcohol hasn't a bad impact on your health when consumed at an any age

We're not getting into that, we're talking about restrictions of products to kids under 18.

And to an younger body alcohol poses a danger, just as sugar also poses a developmental danger or nicotine.

I totally fail to see how exposure to pornography hurts children, some have exposure to much worse through out their lives, so what makes sex so special this day and age.

Parents are responsible for the shit their kids get into online not the content providers. It's like having HBO and letting your kids have their own tv.

>tfw when you used to stay up late to watch real sex on HBO and get the occasional almost full frame on the scrambled hotnet

>>57018145
That is a good analogy, I have noticed something about feminism/protect the children type movements.

Basically, women want the government to step in for their inability to have a fucking conversation with their husbands/partners. Aren't you ever tired of hearing bullshit like this

>I work all day and then come home and have take care of the kids and the house so I need this law, says married woman

What the fuck keeps you from seperating parenting/home duties with your spouse? You want all the work so you can claim that you did it all, but at the same time you want none of the work because it's to much and you have it the hard way.

>>57011365
>live in uk
>use free vpn or proxy
>watch porn

>>57018308
so what, you want parents to check the router logs to make sure jimmy isnt looking at meatholes.com instead of doing his homework? it seems unfair to both parents and children to say that the only optionis NO privacy/total monitoring at all times. Like, imagine if on jimmy's walk home from school there was a liquor store that would only let you in if you pressed a button that says "yes i am 18" and there was no verification or repercussions for pressing said button and getting yourself some beers. Would the parents really be out of line for complaining that this is available when jimmy starts drinking underage?

>neofascist liberals: we need to regulate porn, kids aren't old enough to experience sexuality, it's not healthy, it's degenerate, our fathers were right, raise the age of consent too
>neofascist liberals: of course a 12 year old knows they're transexual, let them fuck up their body for life with delayed puberty. kids understand their sexuality just fine, shitlords.

oi don't get it

like, personally i'd like to be able to NOT know that my child is streaming anime from coolnarutoeps.com/freemousecursors while also being pretty sure that he's not accessing hardcore pornography. Just like I'd like said child to be able to go out into the city without me monitoring his every movement, while being pretty sure that he wont be served liquor or tobacco

>>57014914
According to who? Feminists who want more relationships to be purely emotional so they can get off with fucking tonnes of dudes while using a beta husband for financial support?

>>57018396
You can't have it all. You can't live in a democratic society and impose an alternative dictatorship realty on everyone who is under 18, won't work ever. If Jimmy gets a hold of beer and he is 14 years of age then you have several people at fault, the kid, the retailer and the parents. No more no less, you want to make the parents solely responsible? That is total bullshit because the kid ain't a robot you can program with education, you are not born a blank slate you are who you are. The parents can be the best parents in the world and the kid turn out a pretty shitty person, and the reverse can happen, just because you got shitty parents doesn't mean you won't get out of that situation either. Then the retailer because he should check IDs.

But none of the bullshit that happens here in the USA where you literally throw the kid in jail and strip the license from the retailer even if the kid was deceiving the retailer, prohibition worked so well after all.

We either live in a open society or we don't, I rather live in a world where a 14 year old can get a hold of a beer if he truly wants it and not be thrown in jail which would have far worse repurcussions for that kids life and that would be a problem between the kid and his parents/guardian.

>>57018396
>Comparing a brain damaging poison to something you can get by saying "I'll show you mine if i show you yours" after lying to a girl about how you're a dirtbike racer

actually you can get the brain damaging poison by doing the same thing, so....

anyways, i'm not all for the government knowing everyone's porn tastes. sounds like a nazi fantasy.

>At last, heinreich, ve veel finally be able to murder all ze degenerates!

>>57018396
Also, I like how you talk as if the choices here of a teenager having beer are actually so terrible compared to what life was just 40 years ago where teenage pregnancy rate was higher, along with smoking and alcohol consumption. Most of those in that generation turned out ok.

Compared to teenage pregnancy and smoking makes pornography and underage drinking not that big of a deal for society in the long run.

Interesting he doesn't mention anything about actually geolocating people in the UK or more importantly, most of the world's porn and its market isn't in the UK.
Can the UK gov realistically force youporn and brazzers to go through all this shit?

>>57016381
>Natural selection doesn't work for many years.
What are people whole body has an unhealthy appetite or it stores more fat than other
What is choosing your mate by the looks. The bottom falls of, but not completely. Just like natural selection normally works; slowly.
On top of that, what is people that die early in their life due to poor health choises/weak body.

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/evo_32

>>57018523
pornography is brain damaging poison, especially for young people whose brains are still undeveloped

>>57019268
But that doesn't match up with reality.

On terms of development alone, our bodies start puberty as young as 9 years of age if not younger. You are arguing that we know better than the thousands of years of evolution that made us the way we are today, that the thing our bodies tell us to do shortly after we are ten years old is a poison.

>>57018767
They'll tell UK ISPs to block them if they don't comply

then again that ISP blocking is only "Have the ISP's DNS server's not return results for them", I believe, so it should be trivially mitigatable

>>57018448
Why are mentally ill leftists such hypocrites? They need to be culled from the population before they pass on their genes to the next generation. That is, if any of these beta cucks can get within 20 feet of a roastie's vagina.

>>57011365
>UK
Don't care.

>>57011365
We should be worried about much more than just porn. Stupid shits will sell their freedoms without a thought if they're told it will protect their children or help fight terrorists. Look at how Trump has gone on about wanting to censor the internet and his supporters defend that because muh evil terrorists.

>>57020016
Oh shut the fuck up about Trump, this nation passed the fucking PATRIOT Act, and PRISM wasn't even a topic at the debates; both of which are more egregious violations of the constitution than some vague claim about censoring the internet.

>>57019268
So we should kill all the dogs humping in the middle of the street? Or the family dog trying to hump everyone's legs?

>>57020254
>but what about this other stuff
That doesn't change how more and more people are wanting internet censorship in countries that normally wouldn't be associated with censoring media. It's also more than just Trump in the US:
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160715/07492134980/newt-gingrich-merely-visiting-isis-al-qaeda-website-should-be-felony.shtml

I'd say with politicians in the US calling for internet censorship, improving censorship resistant services and preparing for a potential future where information is not freely available like it is currently should really be focused on now rather than later.

>>57020480
The internet is already heavily censored by the DMCA.

And yes, decentralized networks are being built and have growing popularity in some circles.

But complaining about piddly threats like the mean words a couple of political outcasts (Newt Gingrich has not held a political office in over 15 years, and Donald Trump has never held a political office) throw around while bulk data collection is actually really happening is just silly.

>>57020016

Or look at how Hillary has been saying that we need to make the Internet safe for little girls

The free flow of information is bad for big business, and they'll buy off whatever politicians are in power to stop it.

>>57020602
>The free flow of information is bad for big business, and they'll buy off whatever politicians are in power to stop it.
Depends on what that information is.
If it's something they can make money on, they're interested and will buy out politicians to make sure that information isn't freely moved (DMCA). If it's stuff they're not interested in like porn, terrorism, or whatever, they don't care.
Any legislation to censor the internet when it comes to things of that nature is purely for political gain.
Big business doesn't care if terrorists are on the internet so long as their business isn't interfered with or their IPs aren't being fucked around with.

>>57020602
>we need to make the Internet safe for little girls
Can't find a source on that, but found this instead:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/07/us/politics/hillary-clinton-islamic-state-saban-forum.html?_r=0
Figured she would get behind something like that but didn't remember any examples off hand when I made that post so I didn't mention her.

>>57011365
>@alecmuffett
>not @alecumbucket

>>57020839
Better source with more complete text quotes:
https://theintercept.com/2015/12/07/obama-hints-at-renewed-pressure-on-encryption-clinton-waves-off-first-amendment/

>>57012137
/pol/ is right again.

File: 1476071064259.jpg (48KB, 500x278px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x278px

>>57013020
>lets save bandwith for the future generations

>>57018448
Everything they do is about centralizing control. They want 1984 because they think they're going to be Big Brother and put all us mean normal people in Room 101 until were "cured" and think just like them.

>>57018318
>live in uk
>use free vpn or proxy
>be branded a terrorist

>>57018396
or you could, you know, not allow your child access to the unfiltered internet.

This doesn't apply to me because I pirate all my porn.

>>57014750
Legal age is 15 in my country. So having sex is ok but a picture of someone else doing it is horrible?

>>57014793
>implying Britbongs could handle that

>>57022303
Marriage is legal for girls in the USA at age 12. 13 for boys.

Yet this is the narrative around the subject.

>>57022140
how would you suggest filtering the child's internet access at the receiving end? a whitelist is the only possible way. I guess you could force your kid to ask you to add each site they want to visit to said whitelist, but that seems unnecessarily controlling when simply forcing pornography providers to check that their viewers are of age could prevent the problem.

>>57018448
>neofascist liberals

I think you mean neo-britbongs

>>57014793
>massive sales lost in the porn industry because the general population loses "boners" while figuring math problem.

Good. The young were protected from this crap up until 20 years ago. They should be today as well.

Lest they turn out like you lot.

File: 1253747476587.jpg (35KB, 495x575px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 495x575px

>>57011365
I already have more hours of porn stored on my drives than im able to fap to through my lifetime.
This is only a problem for casual fapers that stream their shit like a retards.

>>57011365
Was i the only one to spot DEADBEEF?

>>57012226
It's more like the kids take his cigarettes after he loudly announced to no one in particular "FREE CIGARETTES," sets them on the ground and walls away

>>57011365
Ah uk never change.

>>57023861
this desu
Fapping to all manner of hentai fetish porn before I was 14 probably fucked me up somehow.
>Somehow
;)

>>57015014
>Natural selection occurs has a measurable impact over a few thousand years
>This is the mental capacity of /g/

>>57023961
The detrimental effects of long term porn addiction, especially on the younger brain are well documented.

The issues go well beyond perception of others or perception of self

File: 1318799146102.jpg (22KB, 296x266px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 296x266px

>>57023985
am I doomed anon
say it aint so!

>>57023093
Why should a third party be responsible for your parenting?

You going to make youtube require age verification measures because there's sexual content in there? What about tumblr? There's entire blogs on there with nothing but cum dripping from holes. You gonna require age verification for one of the major most used blog providers for the underage demographic?

>>57023994
We are in the shit as a species.
Pron is just part of it.
A massive correction will occur though, it always does. What form this will take or when it will occur is anyone's guess.

>>57012204
simply ebin. no modern parent can keep their child from accessing porn. unless they live in some strict closed community.

>>57024088
well though shit then.

I like it. It'll teach kids how to circumvent internet censorship. I bet in 20 years the UK will be a technology hub, there is no greater incentive for a 14 year old to learn how to hack than porn.

>>57011365
What's in that link? Are they taking porn websites down? Man, I would have to buy actual DVDs if that happens

Just start uploading porn to youtube, facebook, twitter, tumblr or any number of other sites. Help the chilluns out.