Is there anything more aesthetic than modern thinkpad design?

is there anything more autistic than someone thinking that aestheticism is objective?

>>57007542
Shut up

>>57007542
if aestheticism wasnt objective then things wouldnt hold value for looking objectively good

>>57007538
Old ThinkPad design.

also >>57007542

File: thinkpad x201s.jpg (210KB, 780x1088px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 780x1088px

>>57007538
>soldered on CPU
>soldered on RAM
>soldered on eMMC
>soldered on battery
>no backlit keys or thinklight
>no ins/del/home/end keys

Fucking disgusting.

Old thinkpads.

They're literally some the best of the "golden age" of PC's before they started trying to become and compete with tablets and smart devices

>>57007568

Do you brush your teeth at night?

>>57007559
old thinkpads are durable and dependable but they are ugly

new ones are also durable and dependable but they are nice to look at

it wont impress any macfags because they want "muh glossy shiny aluminum shit" though

>>57007575
Their longevity will be shit because they have no user serviceable parts anymore.

>>57007575
>old thinkpads are durable and dependable but they are ugly
Subjective.

>new ones are also durable
lel

File: mac-pro-and-case.jpg (731KB, 2400x1600px) Image search: [Google]

731KB, 2400x1600px

is there anything more aesthetic than this trash can that's also a robot from Star Wars on the inside?

File: ibm-thinkpad-750c.jpg (62KB, 645x512px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 645x512px

Classic ThinkPad design.

File: thinkpads 2016.png (399KB, 1047x780px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 1047x780px

>thinkpads will never be good ever again

this hurts
so much

>>57007586
tfw u cant use apple because of work and school

File: AppleStoreEmployees.jpg (105KB, 484x354px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 484x354px

>>57007538
>Is there anything more aesthetic than modern thinkpad design?

Yes, the MacBook Pro design :^)

File: 1435895583086.jpg (18KB, 395x387px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 395x387px

>>57007538
i too enjoy moving the mouse cursor accidentally with my thenar

>>57007646
but thats a Mac pro though
its for pros at work

how do I get the Darth Vader aesthetic on my PC?

>>57007538
HP and Dell (and Apple) do a better job nowadays
after the 40 series they just started to look bland, dated, and clunky as fuck

File: MacPro.gif (2MB, 411x458px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 411x458px

>>57007586
It looks like a trash can.

File: Sony_HitBit_HB-75D_full.jpg (328KB, 1900x1074px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1900x1074px

this shit right here

File: Mac_Pro_2013_inside (1).png (369KB, 446x616px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 446x616px

>>57007668
with the cover on its a trash can
with the cover off its some Star Wars shit

File: mac_cube.jpg (36KB, 728x435px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 728x435px

>>57007586
>>57007691
Not gonna lie I really really like the whole concept of this thing. I just feel like Apple took way too long with this and ended up releasing it during a time where most of their customers stopped giving fucks about Desktop computing. It's basically just bragging. Next generation might be interesting when it comes with Thunderbolt 3 which opens up the possibility of using PCI devices externally. Still to expensive, but I enjoy looking at it.

Also, they should have made the housing transparent.

>>57007568
I have a x201 (x201s has heat issue, x200 has a processor too old and x220 is in the 16:9 era) but I admit the screen of the x1 carbon is goat.

Beside reparability, what's wrong with getting soldered components if the specs are maxed out?

Also, the battery of the x1 is not soldered not glued, you just have to open the laptop to access it.

>>57007538
It's ugly, you just trained yourself to fetishize memes

>>57007691
they should have made a clear cover option

>>57007601
>one slot of ram in x260
>you can't order more ram if you don't upgrade for the most expensive CPU
The most expensive CPU upgrade cost $200 more than the price recommended on ark Intel.

>>57007538
Classic thinkpad design?

>>57007891
Ugly? What about this thing is ugly? I'd agree that Lenovo printing their fucking name and the product name on the bezel is a shit idea but show me a better looking (non-Apple) laptop.

>>57007555
Aestheticism isn't objective. Things can hold value in terms of their looks because the majority say it looks good (see: Macbooks) but that doesn't mean it's objectively good looking. That doesn't exist.

File: The-Rape-of-Proserpina-Leg-Indention.jpg (792KB, 979x1306px) Image search: [Google]

792KB, 979x1306px

>>57008111
>Aestheticism isn't objective
>Objectively good looking things don't exist.

Are you for real or are you just ugly and in denial?

>>57007660
I have this case only it's all black desu. That looks like shit.

File: t92.png (156KB, 650x1014px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 650x1014px

>>57007538
yes

File: t92_2.jpg (128KB, 2155x1212px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 2155x1212px

>>57007538
tell me you wouldn't buy this piece of ass

>>57007549
just go stomp around, autist.

File: kids-say-the-darndest-things.jpg (79KB, 360x270px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 360x270px

>>57007575
>new [Thinkpads] are also durable and dependable

>>57007648
the fuck is a thenar

File: Screen Shot 2016-10-10 at 1.31.57 AM.png (521KB, 1316x1590px) Image search: [Google]

521KB, 1316x1590px

>>57008371
not him, but this google thing is nuts. it has an answer for just about everything.

File: X61T.jpg (627KB, 2150x2350px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 2150x2350px

Is there anything more aesthetic than a convertible with 4:3 screen?

X 6 2
6
2

>>57007538
BLACKED

>>57007601
the hinge is worse starting with the 240
fucking retarded

File: 1464707105100.png (307KB, 517x599px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 517x599px

>>57008277
>>57008352
>drop hinges

>>57008381
holy shit, can you look up other things as well?

>>57007568

OP, that is a nice Thinkpad

File: IMG_0448.jpg (37KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 640x480px

>>57007538
I believe so, yes.

I admit tho, thinkpads are sexy.

File: 20161010_095436_HDR.jpg (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

Someone please buy my X1 carbon so I can buy a proper t420

>>57012292
See:
>>57007647

>>57012395
what's wrong with it?

>>57007559
/thread

although at the same time I can't wait for 5 years from now when 1st/2nd-gen X1s go for $100-$150 on CL

>>57012668
It's not approved by /g/ because poorfags can't afford it.

>>57012395
I'll trade you for my T420
Those things are shit, why would you want one? All the gutlessness of an ultrabook with none of the extra portability.

File: Apple-MacBook-Pro-15-inch-Late-2013.jpg (606KB, 1400x796px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 1400x796px

That would be the MacBook Pro.

You cannot get a more objectively functional design than this. There is not a gram of unnecessary fixture. It is beautiful because its almost impossible to make it anything more perfect than it already is. Like an iPhone 4 or 5, its just timelessly elegant while not even trying. It looks better than anything else without even aiming to.

>>57013149
too bad about that bezel and ugly two-tone color scheme

>>57007542
Yes. Thinking that aesthetics aren't objective.

>>57013444
Not that guy but how are they objective?

>>57007538
Carbon fibre VAIOs

File: 1.jpg (40KB, 425x413px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 425x413px

Is there anyhing more aestetic than the Sony Vaio UX280p?

>>57012769
>>57013051
The touchpad is janky as fuck and the ThinkNipple™ sometimes starts drifting after I release my finger
Also
> 4GB soldered RAM
I want a Real Thinkpad™ with the classic keyboard and touchpad, none of this bullshit "accurate" keyboard design, it fucking feels like shit

File: music.png (411KB, 1273x708px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 1273x708px

>>57013149
Too rounded. When you think about it, the square shape of the Thinkpad is more masculine and the MacBook design is feminine.

Concerning the discussion of aesthetics, it is more objective than it is subjective. But I think it's both, although I believe aesthetics are more objective.

Mathematics prove that certain designs in nature are more appealing to humans than others. This is an objective fact.
>golden ratio
>fibonacci sequence
>sacred geometry
>even in music underlies mathematical designs based in nature, which humans find more appealing in aesthetics

About the MacBooks looking feminine in how they're rounded, even this is based in objective mathematical principles. Roundness is something we associate when femininity and the effeminate. Perhaps this is a principle of why the meme of Mac products being for homosexuals is rampant.


>tl;dr aesthetics are more objective than subjective

>>57013580
Not him you were talking to, but I posted this:
See:
>>57013771

>>57008352

DICK STATUS: MUH

Seriously though, this better not be vaporware

>>57008381
Thanks for your autism, now you can google everything for them AND provide a screenshot like the spoonfeeding whore you are.

>>57013727
>drifting after I release my finger
my x201 does that shit

File: BLACKED.png (719KB, 2155x1212px) Image search: [Google]

719KB, 2155x1212px

>>57008352

File: new-chromebook-pixel-2242.0.jpg (208KB, 2040x1360px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 2040x1360px

Hello.

File: BlacksOnBlondes.png (2MB, 1000x665px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x665px

>>57013968
And don't give me any shit about it saying blacks on 'blondes.' I see it's not a literal blonde, but the interracial porn site doesn't only show blacks fucking blondes, they fuck redheads, brunettes on that site too.

>>57013985
That actually looks good to me. No stupid Google logo on it too that they usually have on chromebooks.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (266KB, 3000x1687px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 3000x1687px

>>57013985

>>57013985
>feminine piece of shiny metal

nty, im not gay

>>57013985
Where can I get this and how much is it?

>>57013985
For all the people who doubt that online shilling serves no purpose, just know this. I never knew this laptop existed and right now I'm going to buy one.

>>57013547
Woa! It has 5 screens that all fan out? Kind of cool but gimmicky, not sure how that is useful really.

>>57013985
>>57014049
Strange how the conversations stopped. As if everyone else is buying their new Google Pixel laptop like I am. Damn that thing is beautiful. I know you think I'm shilling but I'm not and the guy who posted these pics knows I'm a different person.

>>57014267
There's no difference in being retarded compared to pretending to be retarded.

>>57007940
they do this for multiple modern thinkpad models, including the t460. Fucking annoying. Why do I need an expensive hot ass i7 @3.40 to get 16 gb ram.

File: 1471635488259.jpg (571KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 1920x1080px

>>57014289
I stand before you, I take an apple out of my pocket and say, prove this apple exists.

You can't, the apple before you does not actually exists. Months pass and the apple is no longer before you, does it still exists? Did it ever exist?

>>57013771

>too rounded
>feminine

How? How corners of a rectangle be too rounded?

>>57007773
>I just feel like Apple took way too long with this and ended up releasing it during a time where most of their customers stopped giving fucks about Desktop computing

I think that was peak gloss. It started with candy in the initial OS X release, went to gloss, then I think it went skeumorphic, and now flat.

>>57014361
What kind of pants are you wearing that you can comfortably keep an apple in them? How small is the apple? You give no criteria of proof, and do not allow me to inspect or test the apple. This is a stilted scenario wherein you do not allow me to prove the apple exists.

>>57014423
>rounded jaw on a woman
>squared jaw on a woman

Choose the feminine one.

>>57014526
Who said it was my pants pocket, maybe I am wearing a hooded sweater with a oblong pocket along the abdomen.

The apple is wherever you want it to be, it doesn't exist therefore you can place it wherever you can imagine it being. With full control over the apple and ability to manipulate it how you wish.

However, the criteria for proof of the apples existence is not a simple thing to ask for, simply prove the apple exists. That is all I can say.

>>57014562

I am not talking about a facial feature. I am talking about the edges of a MacBook Pro. Please try to stay on topic.

>>57007568
Get your eyes checked anon.

>>57007538
>Is there anything more aesthetic than modern thinkpad design?
Easy. Old thinkpad design.
I am writing this right now on my X1C, and this fucker does not compare to the old ones.
It does not look good, and worse, it does not work well!
Sure, it is thin and has great battery life, and no things that stick out (negatively or positively), such as the blue enter key, but that does not make for a great aesthetic. It's just an unnoticable black slab. Sure, that is better than a LED ridden jet engine soundging gaymur monstrosity, but it is also nothing special.
And combine this with the fact that it is fuckin expensive and a functional failure, this makes for a pretty shitty laptop.
And the fact that everything else on the market is even worse, does not make this acceptable.

Just look at stuff like the "butterfly" thinkpad or if you want something more recent, the X300. 100% functional, at the cutting edge of thechnology, yet still a well thought out aesthetic full package.

But the modern ones? meh…If it werent for the trackpoint (which also got worse BTW) and the affordable used market, I would have literally picke dup soome random shit from bestbuy and had 90% the same (shit) experience and looks.

>>57014643
You're a moron.

See:
>>57013771

>>57014643
>black MacBook Pro
>hot pink Macbook Pro

Choose the gayer, effeminate MacBook Pro. Why is this hard for you to understand aesthetics are objective.

>>57007648
Fuckin this.
What kind of tape can I put on my touchpad that blocks the electrical field of my thenar?
I dont want to completely disable it, since I need it for browsing in my bed or on my couch. Thanks to the fucking sharp edges, I cant use the superiour trackpoint in that position, without cutting my wrists, so I just want to make the touchpad smaller.

>>57007538
>that screen
jesus christ it's like they always have a 50% opacity filter on

>>57007559
xx10-xx20 were objectively the best.

>>57015325
Isn't that just because of the sunlight? I think all screens look like that in the light. I guess it looks good in the dark though.

>>57013051
>Those things are shit,
What's wrong with them? Im loving my T520, the difference can't be that much.

File: dell-chromebook-13-0018.0[1].png (744KB, 1020x680px) Image search: [Google]

744KB, 1020x680px

>>57013985
qt

i also like dell chromebook 13

>>57015390
> I think all screens look like that in the light
Not all, only glossy.

>>57014696

I'm not talking about colors, I am asking you very plainly why a rounded edge on a metal laptop is effeminate and you can't seem to answer.

>>57015390
>I think all screens look like that in the light

It's what shitty displays with poor brightness look like. I hate this shit.

>>57015526
You're a moron. There's a reason being heterosexual is described as being "straight." Which implies, homosexuality is its opposite, curved. A rounded edge is curved. These are aesthetics.

>>57015562

>There's a reason being heterosexual is described as being "straight." Which implies, homosexuality is its opposite, curved. A rounded edge is curved.
>"I am really taking this as far back as I can and reaching so hard I just grew 2 inches"

Now That's What I Call Autism '16!

Sorry mate, that's got to be the most retarded thing I've heard in about 6 hours. I was on /biz/ earlier. Being hetereosexual is described as being straight, because its a straight path in life to being decent. The devil deceives and leads poor souls astray, off the straight path. That deviation can be another straight line branching off. You utter fucking dumb cunt.

>>57015660
>says the homosexual Macfag

Again, I repeat.

>black MacBook Pro
>hot pink Macbook Pro
>Choose the gayer, effeminate MacBook Pro. Why is this hard for you to understand aesthetics are objective.

These are aesthetics, they are objective, and based in nature with mathematical properties.

>>57013727
>the ThinkNipple™ sometimes starts drifting after I release my finger
All Thinkpads do that, I believe it's actually some sort of calibration mechanism.

I can see your complaints about the touchpad, don't really think the keyboard will be all that much better for you though, the newer ones are actually probably better than that limp mushy shit the *20s ship with.

>>57015425
The bulk of a W series, the guts of an X series, the disgusting bezel and shitty display of an SL/similar budget series. Used one for over a year, never got the hype.

File: WashingtonMonument.jpg (1MB, 3337x5238px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3337x5238px

>>57015660
>is this statue masculine?
>is this statue feminine?
Obviously masculine because it's a giant dick. Rigid. Straight. Not curved.

Same thing applies to the aesthetics of a woman's jawline. A round female jaw is feminine. A squared female's jaw is masculine. These are aesthetics.

Apply the same aesthetics to the rounded design of a MacBook Pro compared to a squared Thinkpad. Thinkpad is more masculine in aesthetics, which implies the MacBook is for homosexuals and the effeminate because it's feminine.

These are the underlying aesthetic principles about the meme of 'Macs being for gays,' only no one else has explained the unexplained aspects until I just did.

Aesthetics, bitch. They're objective and based in nature, which is mathematical in properties.

File: 1460326020819.jpg (36KB, 400x460px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 400x460px

>>57014317
You "don't"
>tfw it's more cost effective to buy a stick of ram separately and plug it in
>for a laptop
And then /tpg/ fanboys will argue back that "if you're looking for 16gb of ram you're doing it wrong and should be in the market for a desktop computer" .
>mfw

I don't know about old T models but my x201 have two slots of ram making the newer thinkpad objectively worse from a design viewpoint. I guess the T460s having everything soldered in hints the same conclusion.

File: thinkpad.jpg (42KB, 450x392px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 450x392px

>>57016102

The corners are rounded because people's wrists rest at an angle to type you utter fucking mongoloid. What the fuck are you talking about with all this shit? No, you have not 'for the first time' delivered us some holy message that we knew not before you came. You're just being an aspie who think's he's correct on something. You may just be the biggest retard on 4chan this week if you keep it up. I'm not fucking talking about massive cock statutes either, why are you presenting me with other shit that I'm not even talking about?

Oh look at pic related, its curved at the front which implies that its a 70's female's pointy breast. This means it must be feminine. Kill yourself. Faggots are usually broke and use whatever $250 device there is at Walmart.

File: FagBook.jpg (70KB, 675x403px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 675x403px

>>57017145
No you moron, I'm not talking about the rounded part where the palms rest, I'm talking about the design of the laptop, the corners of the parts that don't need to be rounded, you moron. Like the screen being rounded for no reason, it's a gay design. Get over it, Macs are for fags, it's not a meme for no reason. I already explained why.

>>57007538
Why are you asking this?
Are you insecure about your buying decisions?

>>57017145
>Oh look at pic related, its curved at the front which implies that its a 70's female's pointy breast. This means it must be feminine.

It is feminine, you moron.

>>57017244

No. Why are you only talking about THAT curve? EVERY curved face of an object is a sign of homosexuality right? Does the slant on the front of the ThinkPad imply its for limp dicks? Its either that or 70's pointy tits. Its GOT TO mean something, everything has some hidden meaning man. Fuck, I just noticed my router has a rounded edge, time to get that 6-antenna spider looking shit I guess, don't want homosexual rounded corners in my house do I?!

Your fellow 15 year olds must be missing you, let me help you return home. >>>/v/

May God never let any curved edge near you lest it bring lust for cocks.

>>57017364
>Why are you only talking about THAT curve?

Because it's it's the overall shape that shows it's main essence.
>its aesthetic

In regards to the overall shape of the MacBook, its aesthetic is curved, feminine, and gay compared to the squared, superior, alpha male shape of the Thinkpad. Even the name is masculine, THINKpad. Rarely do you see products designed for women with the term 'think' in it. MacBook might as well be called CockSucker Pro.

>>57017453
>he doesn't have a CockSucker Pro Retina

>>57014874
Write a script to toggle it on and off using xinput then use an xbindkeys hotkey to execute the script.

>>57007542
>more
implies relativism I don't see the problem here

>>57016102
wait a second. if you like the macbook and you're a guy wouldn't that make you heterosexual? heterosexual men are attracted to the feminine after all...I think you've got it all backwards

>>57016066
>>57013727
It's not calibration, the thing is fucking rubber. It has depress time if you press on it too hard. Which, worth noting, makes your fingers ache (in my case, I'm all about the keyboard-driven life now).

Also, if 4GB RAM isn't enough for you on a laptop, you are shit at managing your software.

>>57017946
>implying a man wants to use a hot pink hammer to build a house

>>57017946
>implying a straight man wants to use a hot pink hammer to build a house

Fixed

>>57013771
You sound like a deeply insecure virgin.

File: Panasonic Lets Note CF-RZ5.jpg (137KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1280x960px

>>57007538
Yes

>>57018027
You sound like a gay Mac user.

>>57018027
This is called argumentum ad hominem.

>2016
>still makes retards look like retards

File: dell_xps_15_right_dell_xps_13_left_skylake-100649561-orig.jpg (3MB, 3010x2000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3010x2000px

>>57007538

long time t60 user (back when it had the IBM logo still)
I recently bought an x1 carbon

honestly, the weight alone makes it worth it. it's so light that I sometimes think i forgot my laptop at home because i was so used to carrying my heavy ass older thinkpad

>>57013771
Even if that's the case, there's certainly an argument for men using something feminine in something like a laptop.
Like, calling boats 'she'. That's my line of thought.

Typed on my X220T(c)
which I will never give up because of the feature I just mentioned

>>57008199
How dense are you? Nothing can be objectively good looking because "beauty is in the eye of the beholder", for lack of a fuck to give.

>>57017453

>Because it's it's the overall shape that shows it's main essence

Its a neutral cold aluminium slab of metal, there is nothing to it. Maybe if you didn't live inside Razr's concept storage room you wouldn't think anything that doesn't look like a plastic Velociraptor/Shark hybrid is for girls. I'm really not even sure if I'm being trolled or just talking to a turbo retard at this point.

>Even the name is masculine, THINKpad. Rarely do you see products designed for women with the term 'think' in it.
>being so drawn in by the product name alone
>having 'think' in the name means its for smart men

The irony is off the charts. You don't even know what you just said.

>no numpad

all thinkpads go in the trash

>>57018445
>implying women think

>>57018508
>numpad on a laptop

>>57018539
lol

File: pbg4.png (735KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

735KB, 1440x900px

>>57018508
>numpad on a laptop
Disgusting. This is the only acceptable solution. Well that and the UltraBay numpad.

File: beautiful.jpg (405KB, 1920x1100px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 1920x1100px

>>57007538
Thinkpads are cute, but there's something about the 15 inch macbook that gives me a boner.

Too bad it's so outdated nowadays, only haslel options available.

File: bef54bb2abf7bbb871845729435585a7.png (558KB, 2418x1472px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 2418x1472px

>>57018566
Personally I don't like big laptops because of the huge keyboard bezels.

>>57018508
>>57018562
Who the fuck needs a numpad when there's numbers right there in a straight line?

>>57018118
I love how the bezels makes the footprint so much smaller, too bad they went 16:9 on it, imagine a bezelless 3:2 or 16:10, would be fucking perfect.

Too bad it's fucking Dell, their support is bullshit and I heard build quality is garbage.

>>57018566
>there's something about the 15 inch macbook that gives me a boner.
The 15 inch big black cock in your ass.

>>57018601
People who want to input numbers efficiently? Are you one of those dipshits with a TKL keyboard at their desktop?

>>57007773
Im sure Mac Pro was more meant for big production studios like Pixar
Normies wouldnt understand

>>57018580
I like big laptops because of the huge display, you can't go back once you go huge.

I would definitely buy a bezelless 17 inch laptop if they manage to build it thin and light enough.

I don't care about keyboard bezels, just put some badass speakers there and it's fine.

>>57018614
> here's you're (you)

>>57018640
>you can't go back once you go huge.
Yes you fucking can. My school gave me a 15" laptop and I hated every moment of using it. Recently fixed a guy's 17" laptop and just looking at the thing pissed me off.

>>57018671
If the display is high resolution you can't go back anon, trust me.

15 inch is the perfect size for me, but I would even go further if they manage to build a bezelless 17 inch high resolution display, too bad there's no such thing.

>>57018847
>If the display is high resolution you can't go back anon
A higher resolution display isn't going to make the laptop physically smaller. I simply hate >13" laptops. If it's not 13" or under, trust me, I want nothing to do with it.

>>57018873
>A higher resolution display isn't going to make the laptop physically smaller. I simply hate >13" laptops. If it's not 13" or under, trust me, I want nothing to do with it.
Then you're a fucking manlet dude

>>57018889
No, I just prefer things to be more portable than you do.

>>57018873
Same here, but with 14" instead of 13"

14" laptops are perfect imo.

these threads are always 90% "what I have but minus the bad bits"

>>57019009
Even 13" is large for me, but it's bearable. 12" 4:3 laptops are perfection

>>57013714
UX4** is black and nicer.

File: image.jpg (994KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 3000x2000px

>>57018118

Wew

>>57019157
>X320
What in the fuck? There's no such thing.

>>57019230

There is thanks to the chinks ;^)

File: cm_amd_haf_932_22.jpg (97KB, 550x734px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 550x734px

>>57007660

>>57007555
Things hold value not because they look good, but because someone says they hold value, regardless of aesthetics. Do you even economics

>>57019314
Ok, let's starts a thread every day saying Pentium 4 is worth $500 each. Let's see how far that gets us.

>>57013771
If that's the case, homosexuals would be attracted to your beloved masculine thinkpads. You should try interacting with people to bring you back to reality sometimes.

>>57018603
This. I'm surprised /g/ doesn't meme about the superiority of squarer aspect ratios. It's actually important and you'd think the autists would water at the mouth to talk about this shit in detail

File: Nigger.com.png (229KB, 1280x775px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1280x775px

>>57013985
>>57014049
>>57014118
>>57014268

I like my t450s.
Decent keyboard, decent performance, decent 1080p ips (could be better), all for $640.

>>57007538
please
modern """"""""""""thinkpad"""""""""" """"""""""""""""design""""""""""""""""" is almost indistinguishable from Walmart laptops

Lenovo has ruined the brand

>>57008352
>>57008277
oh look it's non existent PR stunt

>>57012395
can someone buy my t500 from me aswell

File: decal.jpg (71KB, 1102x748px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 1102x748px

>>57013149
Honestly, I'd love MacBooks if I was a girl or a homosexual.

>>57019157
wake me up when they properly sell to western markets

Not getting an X62 until then

>>57013149
wew
didn't know the change in ads meant they were going to start appearing in user generated posts

>>57017364
someone please get this, and all the other butthurt macfags in this thread, the one screenshot of the study that proved that homosexuals literally had the highest correlation with mac OS than any other operating system.

>>57021111
nice
quads

File: GoldenSpiral.jpg (65KB, 724x457px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 724x457px

>>57008111
>Aestheticism isn't objective
it is mathematically identifiable and in nature the same mathematical principals pop up again and again as producing the optimal aesthetics

>>57021595
literally wrong.

>>57007773
>Also, they should have made the housing transparent.
this
especially since they put such effort into making the internal components look good yet no one ever sees them.

>>57014423
>>57019555
>implying it means "masculine and feminine" in terms of biological sex or whatever other wank
you know in my language there are masculine and feminine words, doesn't mean they are related to sex of humans.

and he's right, the Macbook and core mac designs are very graceful and curvy, while Thinkpads are stern and angular.

Macbook design doesn't make you a fag
owning an apple product does.

No, macbooks can't even compete.
It's by no means a functional design though, some models with cold running cpu tend to overheat and shut down in warmer parts of the world like Australia.

>>57021599
>literally wrong.
then why does literally everything follow these aesthetic principles? why can we identify these mathematical realities again and again?

http://www.sfu.ca/~nathsinc/MTLSinclair.pdf

>>57008352
Only if it came in a swivel screen tablet variant

The New Zenbook 3 and MacBook design.

File: Keyboard.jpg (764KB, 1500x975px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 1500x975px

>>57008352
>>57008277
Oh god yes!

>>57021694
see Kant/Nietzsche/Hume

>>57007773
>buys a desktop
>connects PCIe devices externally

File: tfw.jpg (189KB, 780x1088px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 780x1088px

>>57007568
JUST
U
S
T

>>57020747
>too dumb to install loonix on a coreboot machine
kys yourself

>>57022186
No shit dumbass. I was planning to immediately format and erase the chrome OS and install Linux. I have two Linux distros installed on the pc I'm using now. One is Arch.

>>57007542
ThinkPad is all about aesthetics. It was designed by true industial artists, not some bald faggot obsessed with aluminium.

>>57022230
How do you know someone's an Arch user?

Don't worry, he'll tell you.

>>57022251
Obviously, because you think I'm either using Windows or Mac dumbass.

>>57019157

>all that work just to run Windows 10
wew lad

File: aesthetics.png (504KB, 1278x1300px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 1278x1300px

>>57007538
>Is there anything more aesthetic than modern thinkpad design?
No.

File: letsnote.jpg (458KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 1280x960px

>>57018063

/g/ is now a Let's Note board, Thinkpad shills can fuck off

>>57014361
I eat the apple.

>>57008199
She has a man face and gross feet i dont get why anyone would wanna rape her

>>57022245
Why are you not saying industrial designer "industrial artist" is the gayest shit i've ever heard

>>57021694
>SFU
Nice

>>57019009
>>57019009
14" screen is about a size of A4 paper. It is perfect.

>>57021694
>>57022550

SFU CS grad here, wuddup

>>57018027
How to argue like a normie 101
Guy posted something you dont understand and cant refute?
2 choices
1)Call him autistic
2)Call him a virgin

File: 1402444647504.png (97KB, 277x315px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 277x315px

>>57007648
>having the mouse pad enabled on a thinkpad ever

File: 1476088145973.jpg (235KB, 2155x1212px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 2155x1212px

>>57008352

File: IMG_1442[1].jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>57022876
>owning a thinkpad with a mouse pad
ishygddt

>>57021162
If you're both of those you are literally the greatest thing since sliced bread to men.

>>57013915
>>57013727
>>57016066
>>57017956
all but the old thinkpads have adaptive pressure + accel shit on them that can't be removed to my knowledge. that's what causes the moment of drift. notice it happens most when you've been moving the point for a while, it drifts because it's trying to "assist" your next move. the idea being that it makes it easier on the finger to use the trackpoint for a long period of time. which imo is actually true, but it is less precise if you're really good with the trackpoint. try the trackpoint on an x40 or something, it's like the equivalent of a "perfect" sensor on a mouse. it does get taxing after a while though, it wasn't so bad on the old low-res screens because there was simply less real-estate to traverse, but getting to the edges of a high-res screen with the old trackpoint could be a bother.

>>57018118
>plastic bezels
The hell? I thought these were made of glass

>>57013985
battery life? I won't buy a laptop with less than 10 hours, and of actual use (video or web), not just idle

>>57007542
Functional design is objective.

>>57013985
>the Pixel phone could have looked like this
>instead we got all around garbage

>>57023082
The 3200x1800 and 4K ones are glass.

>>57013727
>ThinkNipple™ sometimes starts drifting after I release my finger
Lol they all do that dude. You are literally making excuses to throw out a superior device for worthless /g/ approval.

>>57019586
neo /g/ doesn't give a shit about 16:10+ aspect ratios. For all they know, 16:9 is the perfect ratio because all their gaming shit works on it. Actual work means nothing to them.

>>57017453
it's posts like these that make me want to throw my bookshelf of shitpads straight into a wood chipper

>>57023267
Because you take the Internet that seriously? Just jump into the wood chipper please. Those Thinkpads have more value than you.

>>57014361
This is, and probably will remain indefinitely, my desktop background. So cozy.

>>57023176
So whats the point of getting the non-4k version then other than actually having battery life. It's nothing special other than it has a thin bezel with retarded hinge design.

>>57022965
>laptop without hinges
how are you gonna be able to shut it retard?

File: Xiaomi-MiBook-Air-Notebook-Collection-04.jpg (75KB, 1300x906px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 1300x906px

Hello.

>>57017364
>taking the bait this hard

File: Selection_556.png (11KB, 367x108px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 367x108px

>>57024022

File: 07-YOGA-BOOK-LIFESTYLE-PHOTOGRAPHY-GOLD-HOME-OFFICE.jpg (153KB, 680x383px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 680x383px

I want one of these

File: BA_btIzCUAMfbEi.jpg (32KB, 600x435px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x435px

>>57024913
It feels like I'm typing on nothing at all!

File: 150312-chromebook_pixel_2_0.jpg (39KB, 748x421px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 748x421px

>>57007538

i know botnet etc but this design tho

Less aesthetic: MacBooks
More aesthetic: DEEZ NUTZ

>specs of an msi stealth pro
>in an x1 carbon chasis
>with a t420 keyboard
>at the price of an emachines
the perfect laptop

>>57025710
GOTTEM

>>57019156
Too bad there are literally none on sale at all

>>57007542
aestheticism is objective

>>57007538
I wish they'd bring back thinkpads without trackpads. I don't mind the 16:9 that much desu.

File: akg1-K10-A1790.jpg (31KB, 375x521px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 375x521px

>>57021595
please wake from your dogmatic slumber

>>57022245
what fucking design, it's a fucking rectangle with keys and a shit screen slapped onto it

>>57007538
Why doesn't palm rest slope forwards reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

>>57026917
haven't you read the thread? rectangles are objectively aesthetic mac homofags BTFO

>>57016066
The problem with the touchpad is that the cursor usually moves away from where I want it to be when I press down on the touchpad
Therefore I want a touchpad with separate buttons, not only the buttons that are for the trackpoint

>>57019586
but we do though

>>57013580
How can they not be?

>>57028153
A judgement with objective universal validity is also always valid subjectively; i.e. if the judgement holds for everything contained under a given concept, it holds also for every one who represents an object by means of this concept. But from a subjective universal validity, i.e. aesthetical and resting61 on no concept, we cannot infer that which is logical; because that kind of judgement does not extend to the Object. Hence the aesthetical universality which is ascribed to a judgement must be of a particular kind, because it does not unite the predicate of beauty with the concept of the Object, considered in its whole logical sphere, and yet extends it to the whole sphere of judging persons.

>>57029350
In respect of logical quantity all judgements of taste are singular judgements. For because I must refer the object immediately to my feeling of pleasure and pain, and that not by means of concepts, they cannot have the quantity of objective generally valid judgements. Nevertheless if the singular representation of the Object of the judgement of taste in accordance with the conditions determining the latter, were transformed by comparison into a concept, a logically universal judgement could result therefrom. E.g. I describe by a judgement of taste the rose, that I see, as beautiful. But the judgement which results from the comparison of several singular judgements, “Roses in general are beautiful” is no longer described simply as aesthetical, but as a logical judgement based on an aesthetical one. Again the judgement “The rose is pleasant” (to smell) is, although aesthetical and singular, not a judgement of Taste but of Sense. It is distinguished from the former by the fact that the judgement of Taste carries with it an aesthetical quantity of universality, i.e. of validity for every one; which cannot be found in a judgement about the Pleasant. It is only judgements about the Good which—although they also determine satisfaction in an object,—have logical and not merely aesthetical universality; for they are valid of the Object, as cognitive of it, and thus are valid for every one.

>>57029368
If we judge Objects merely according to concepts, then all representation of beauty is lost. Thus there can be no rule according to which any one is to be forced to recognise anything as beautiful. We cannot press [upon others] by the aid of any reasons or fundamental propositions our judgement that a coat, a house, or a flower is beautiful. We wish to submit the Object to our own eyes, as if the satisfaction in it depended on sensation; and yet if we then call the object beautiful, we believe that we speak with a universal voice, and we claim the assent of every one, although on the contrary all private sensation can only decide for the observer himself and his satisfaction.

>>57029390
We may see now that in the judgement of taste nothing is postulated but such a universal voice, in respect of the satisfaction without the intervention of concepts; and thus the possibility of an aesthetical judgement that can, at the same time, be regarded as valid for every one. The judgement of taste itself does not postulate the agreement of every one (for that can only be done by a logically universal judgement because it can adduce reasons); it only imputes this agreement to every one, as a case of the rule in respect of which it expects, not confirmation by concepts, but assent from others. The universal voice is, therefore, only an Idea (we do not yet inquire upon what it rests). It may be uncertain whether or not the man, who believes that he is laying down a judgement of taste, is, as a matter of fact, judging in conformity with that Idea; but that he refers his judgement thereto, and, consequently, that it is intended to be a judgement of taste, he announces by the expression “beauty.” He can be quite certain of this for himself by the mere consciousness of the separation of everything belonging to the Pleasant and the Good from the satisfaction which is left; and this is all for which he promises himself the agreement of every one—a claim which would be justifiable under these conditions, provided only he did not often make mistakes, and thus lay down an erroneous judgement of taste

>>57007538
The thinklight on my X201 suddenly stopped working a few months ago.
Everything else is perfect, no clue why this happened.
Any hints on how to fix it?

File: macquarium_main.jpg (27KB, 468x450px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 468x450px

THE MOST AESTHETIC COMPUTER IS THE iMAC G3

PROVE ME WRONG

>>57021355

But all the homosexuals are on /g/ dressed up as girls, using Dragon Dildos with their riced Linux. Linux is the real deviant OS.

>>57018603

Wow, now I finally realize what was 'off' about the designs of the bezelless Dells, they're fucking 16:9. That's why they look like something's not quite there. These dumb bastards never think about anything do they? Why can't more designers be like Jony Ive, who spend like 3 months perfecting the fucking iMac stand.

the ONLY reason to buy a mac book pro is the aesthetic, the OS is shit and barely customizable, the durability is shit, just like their phones, and you're arguing on a thread about thinkpads. thinkpads have looked the same for like ten fucking years now, get over it. they don't need to look nice to compete with something that runs like a bag of shit after you've used it for a month, cause they're actually good laptops.