Why does MATE exist when Gnome Classic is perfectly usable?
>>57001759
Perfectly useable doesn't mean people actually want to use it.
When Linux meets Apple in terms of graphical design it will be the year of Linux. Until then it will remain an obscure OS
>>57001759
because GNOME classic still uses GNOME 3 applications. Just because the desktop looks like GNOME 2 doesn't mean it has the same underlying technologies such as GTK+ 2.0
>>57001759
why do people use gnome classic when there is gnome with the application menu turned on? it makes gnome classic unnecessary
gnome classic doesn't have that bar on the bottom. if it wasn't for that they would be similar
>>57001798
MATE is porting to GTK 3.
I'm kindof conflicted on this. I prefer gnome 2's desktop layout, but the theming engine improvements in GTK+ 3 do seem a legitimate improvement.
The issue is hardware, not looks.
I hate to break it to you but most people don't have 32gb of RAM and 2 4xCore processors.
you can basically make gnome look like mate
pic-related
>>57001878
Gnome classic takes 400MB of RAM for me
>no thumbnails
>>57001759
Because GNOME Classic is just GNOME 3 with some extensions.
>>57001759
> GNOME Classic
> not using gnome-panel 3.18 and metacity-3.18
keep on plebing
>>57001759
how do you even get gnome classic? All i ever see is gnome and cinnamon.
>>57001759
Still not as good as MATE.
>>57001957
Ubuntu mate uses 300MB when I boot my HTPC up.
>>57001794
>When Linux meets Apple in terms of graphical design it will be the year of Linux
We already have better GUI so why porting trash tier GUI from other OSes?
It's the year of linux since 1991, wtf are you talking about?
Don't you realize that you're connected to linux systems right now?
You use them everyday without realizing it.
>inb4 muh I was talking about desktop
It's common knowledge that microshaft and applel steal GPL-licenced source codes.
check mate catholic.
>>57005378
Pantheon.