We need a phone with cameras like this NOW.

>>56988863
Phone cameras were a mistake.

File: dsc06354-1374558892.jpg (25KB, 619x411px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 619x411px

>>56988914
The point is: They could've been much better. Nokia 1020 pureview was a proof of that, but it was a flop because it was overkill, a 1/1.8~1/2" sensor would have already delivered excellent quality without having a bulky lens like the 1020 did.

I can't fathom why Apple still use shitty 1/3" minuscule sensors, Google was on the right track fitting a much "bigger" 1/2.3" sensor in it's pixel, too bad it is expensive as fuck and 1/2.3" sensor is still quite small.

>square sensor means no more vertical video
That is actually quite cleaver but feela kinda of a waste of sensor.

>>56989953
square sensors are the least waste possible actually

>>56990399
Then why we hardly see any sensors being made in that format?