Is this the end /g/?

>>56982724
Yes. It's no longer the question of "if" 4chan will get shutdown, but "when"

> implying ICANN means anything
> implying namecoin hasn't deprecated DNS

fucking nerds.

>>56982724
retard, it has always been in the hands of ICANN. That's not the problem anon, the problem is that China has a part on this (multi corporation) and wants to censor the internet.

>>56982724
>shadowy ICANN social justice warriors
Are you people literally mentally retarded?

>>56982724
>Page 9
Amazing, it's like /pol/ with TPP

This shit will get bad, OP.
There can be disputes since there will be lots of countries like China and the UN will want to censor shit too

If hillary wins it will only get worse so start downloading your anime backlog, some distro images and wikipedia

The internet will die because of greed and USA is not the land of the free but land of the corporations

>>56984971
>If hillary wins
>If
sweet, sweet summer child

>>56984971
the right is the traditional internet censorship party though

doesn't matter who becomes the pretzel of the united states when the representatives matter more

Not really, OP. Having ICANN in the hands of Europe is actually a good thing. However, it could be better if many European politicians were knocked down, but I still trust a European internet more than an American one.

>>56985012
>Having ICANN in the hands of Europe is actually a good thing
lol
t. a yuropor

>>56985012
Not a single country in Europe has absolute freedom of speech. This will endanger the internet.

>>56985034
Not a single country in the Americas has absolute freedom of speech, either.

>>56984988
Kek

>>56982724
DNS isn't the Internet.

>>56985072
i'm saying this AS a european
i would infinitely rather the internet were in the hands of the US than any european country
no one gives a squirt of piss about free speech here

>>56983362
Yes they are
Everyone is here just like you

>>56982724
>Social Justice Warriors
/pol/ talking about shit they have no idea about again, go back to your containment board

>>56985099
There are a great many things illegal in the US which are not prosecuted by European officials online. However, I cannot mention these things because of global rule 1.

>>56985084
This.
Worst case scenario we'll make our own DNS servers with out own top-level domains on top of the existing ones.

>>56985139
i2p always exists, too.

>>56982724
Ok, can someone who actually knows his shit tell me why is this even a thing?
Even if ICANN gets taken by china or whatever can't we just >>56985139 or something like that?

>>56982724

No, you fucking retards.

It is a whole bunch of nothing. ICANN just deals with DNS registry and internet protocol standards.

>>56982724

Daily reminder that the US is not top tier in freedom of speech, does not can into democracy when it comes to criticism (manning, snowden) and the next president will be right wing, no matter which of those two faglets you will vote..

File: muh_freedom.jpg (150KB, 964x538px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 964x538px

>>56985244

Forgot pic..

(also check my dubs of truth)

>>56985149
I2P has just as much domain name censorship as ICANN.
Which wouldn't be an issue if people bothered to provide links with b32 addresses, but unfortunately they don't.

The internet has been shit for years.
What used to be thousands of small pages turned into a few huge pages everyone visits.
And since those pages are owned by also huge companies, nobody is going to censor them.

>>56982724
Congrats on being 2 weeks late I guess. Sagetta.

>>56985215
So, literally everything? Wow, I'm so relieved now that I know that it's nothing because icann has no authority because they have control over literally everything.

ICANN is not run by SJWs. It's mostly run by representatives of businesses, plenty of which are ISPs, and none of which have a vested interest in pulling DNS records from the root servers for the purpose of censorship.

>>56985514
>Tripfag
Check
>Retarded
Check
All is right with the world.

>>56985244
>>56985256

Plenty of the countries you claim to have better freedom of speech than the US have hate speech laws. Meanwhile, our constitution protects all speech, and the only times our supreme court has created exemptions has been in calls to action and threats.

>>56985244
europeans who idolise europe either don't live here or they have completely inoffensive, bland establishment opinions that won't get them into trouble (hint it's you)

>>56985535

Are you going to actually provide a counterargument, or are you merely calling me retarded because you feel like it, having no intent to contest the validity of my post?

>>56985600
Into the filter you go.

>/g/ would rather have the Internet in hands of a country whose president is either insane or a murderer than in the hands of ISPs around the world

>>56985600
Just ignore him. Though I sincerely fucking hate you personally and wish you nothing more than a slow and painful death through a prion infection I have to admit you're right. However while ISP don't have the intention to censor stuff, governments will push them to.

>>56985641
Put your trip back on.

>>56985627
One of these parties can be assassinated. The other can fuck you 37 ways before you've had your morning coffee and ask for more.

As I understand it, ICANN is now independent with no national oversight.
They can take advice from these countries, but can also disregard it. Why does everyone think non affiliated governments are going to drop the b& hammer on anything?

Am I totally off base?

File: Screenshot_2016-10-08-16-52-44(1).jpg (95KB, 720x1045px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 720x1045px

>>56985711
I'm not the tripfag though. Anyway governments will still push ISP to censor shit so we're all fucked anyway. Wasn't implying we will be OK but that we will get fucked in a different way than originally thought.

>>56985728
>why would an entity accept FREE billions of dollars in exchange for banning 4chan forever?

OpenNIC.

Now fuck off.

>>56985764
>free
>in exchange for
Pick one?

>>56985244
>Germany
>Austria
>can't even mention Hitler without getting death sentenced
>Good situation

>>56985783
Inbred or lobotomized? Tell us your story!

>>56985626
>babby needs a safe space
Holy shit could you be more of a pussy

>Internet is meant to be decentralized
>yet DNS still all depends on these ICANN chucklefucks
Why didn't distributed DNS take off bros?

>>56985567
It's not them who claims it, it's an organization of reporters.

Oh yeah, muh freedom to call for violence against all niggers.

File: tripfag emerges.webm (577KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

577KB, 640x360px

>>56985600
>>>/r/eddit

>>56985588
People whose opinions get them in trouble are commonly not very bright and the opinion based solely on emotion rather than reason.

>>56986011
irrelevant

>>56986011
You do realize that advocating for eugenics like you've just done can get you in trouble, yes? But I wouldn't hold you accountable for speaking from emotions like that instead of speaking of facts.

>>56986011
>People whose opinions get them in trouble are commonly not very bright and the opinion based solely on emotion rather than reason.
Who are you to define what can and cannot be said?

>>56985783
Wow thanks, my country is retarded and blocks every hentai site.

>>56986027
>>56986039
>>56986059
I don't care if stupid people can get in trouble for being stupid. Sorry.

>>56986068
So you don't mind getting murdered by drones for being yourself? Well that's fine by all of us. You'll do the whole world a solid by getting yourself killed.

File: sheep.png (170KB, 445x355px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 445x355px

>>56986011

>>56985012
>having the Internet in the hands of countries that want to jail you for being rude to brown people in YouTube comments is a "good thing"
>b-but muh porn and warez

>>56986091
If that's how you like to twist it, sure.
But if you think a bit more about it, there is a difference between purposely doing something that will negatively affect others due to a stupid reason, and just doing something stupid that doesn't affect anyone.

>>56986068
You aren't smart enough to tell if someone's stupid, Anon. All your beliefs match what is expected or desired from you. You are incapable of forming an opinion. You are not an individual. In a different time period, you would be whipping slaves or helping secret police.

>>56986162
So why are you doing the former?

>>56986162
>>56986068
free speech protections won't matter to you until one day you need them yourself

File: the_box1.jpg (41KB, 460x345px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 460x345px

>>56986183
People, like him, who have nothing to say don't need free speech.

>>56986011
too bad modern Europe was built on those "not very bright" people who challenged and died fighting against absolute monarchs and dictators to give you the ability to post this not very bright opinion on the Internet

>>56986170
>>56986179
>>56986183
Why do I even bother. You're just making baseless assumptions just to find something to criticize or 'clever' to write.

>>56986227
>assumptions
Governments and power hungry people aren't necessarily smart.

>>56986227
how is it baseless?

you've repeatedly said that "only stupid people" get into trouble

it's just an argument from hubris

>>56982724

>Internet now in control of an organization that never gets anything done because it worries about making sure absolutely everyone agrees first

Oh well, nothing will change.

>>56985828
Explain how me solving the problem makes me either inbred or lobotomized?

>>56982740
.org domains aren't controlled by ICANN. Quit sperging out over nothing.

>>56985256

>Angola

What?

>>56986347
Probably because you just wrote the name of something without even giving a small blurb about what it is or why anyone should care.

>open router settings
>change DNS settings to your liking
Wow, it's fucking nothing.

>>56986378
>An organization of hobbyists who run an alternative DNS network, also provides access to domains not administered by ICANN
First result on Google either inbred or lobotomized fuck.

>>56982724
No, it's not the end. There are alternative DNS networks, like OpenNIC. They provide access to domains not administered by ICANN

Why is /pol/ always trying to talk about things they don't have a single clue about, merely regurgitating the same flawed arguments over and over again?

>>56986347
So, which is it? And how do you communicate? Is it a BCI or do you have a maid?

>>56986457
*tips fedora*

>>56986372
ICANN has control over literally everything now, retard.
>>56986428
They don't give access to domains administered by ICANN except by standard lookup.

>>56986457
Welcome to politics in general.

>>56986378

Do you need to be spoofed everything?

>>56986457
Fuck off Google.

>>56985256
>Colombia is red
>Venezuela just orange
what the fuck

File: jew.jpg (52KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x600px

>>56986457
>Oy vey goy, listen to ICANN and trust them. They are your greatest allies.

>>56982740
4chan will never die. The name may be taken from us, but the spirit will live on.

File: 1447552907074.jpg (19KB, 310x201px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 310x201px

>>56986713
>>56986658
Kill yourselves back to /pol/, 8gag or reddit.

>>56986457
how to spot a safe space newfag
>get out /pol/

>>56986726
Certainly no spirit you've ever known.

>icann
>important
Try again, /pol/

It can't get any worse than it is now. Throwing all the private data of everyone who registers a domain in a public whois.

Most European country tlds have already proven there is no need for that.

>>56985256
This is press freedom only

>>56985139
it will never catch on
>>56985256
>Germany
>white
you can't even jokingly say heil hitler there

>>56982724
No. You can't control the 'internet' because it's actually an abstract concept. Like our consciousness is really just a manifestation of the functions of our nervous system, so too the internet is just the fact that there are two or more machines connected to each other and packets get routed between machines. Like everything computer related, alternatives would come around within hours of any big scary decision you people are afraid of.

To post on /g/ you should understand how shit works.

>>56986059
Stupid = anything not acceptable by the mainstream

>>56986665
Colombia has a paramilitary problem, but yes right now Venezuela is worse. I think that picture is outdated.
>https://rsf.org/en/ranking

File: tips fedora.jpg (89KB, 651x720px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 651x720px

>>56986011

>>56985641

Which governments, the US government, which has done nothing with its role of steward of ICANN, or every other government, which companies like Comcast and Time Warner can ignore without any consequences whatsoever?

>>56985968

>muh freedom to call for violence against all niggers
Actually, as I stated, calls to action are not protected speech. But you have a right to call them niggers if you please, and you have a right to degrade them as you please. Everyone should have a right to say things that are offensive at their core, or else we might as well not have free speech at all.

>>56989639
I disagree. Either we are free to say anything or we don't have free speech. After all calling on action and actually doing it are two different things.

It's kinda the reason why Charles Manson is in prison for murders he himself never even committed.

>>56982771
Well they can't.

>>56982740
You fuckers know what it will be like when a website with ~150 million daily pageviews gets censored by the Chinese? Even people outside of the memenet know what 4chan is. Even if it's at a "Who is this 4chan" capacity they know 4chan is a very popular thing and the people driving the traffic here won't just disappear. Even with the short attention span of the average person there will be enough of a drive long enough that this website will be secured. 4chan is too big to go down by some outside force. The only person who can fuck it up is Hiroshimoot. If you want to be scared of someone, be scared of him. He just swindled a lot of you for 4chan passes under the pretense that he couldn't support 4chan without them - total BS. Stop being paranoid idiots and focus.