Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
>1050 Ti will apparently only be as powerful as a 960
>950 was already almost a 960 and there was a 75w version
Shouldn't it be a lot better even just from the 28nm to 16nm shrink?
I need a low power card for a build and was hoping for a decent improvement over Maxwell. Kind of lame that they go so little improvement when the 1060 is twice as powerful as its predecessor.
>>
In 3Dmark its 15% faster than 960 and its exactly what its gonna be - a slightly faster 960, still not 970
>>
I hope it is around $130-150.
>>
>>56981660
>tfw there is no way the 1060 can fit the thermal envolope of the XPS15
>tfw Dell is waiting to put this shitty 1050 in there instead
Goddamnit.
>>
>>56982170
Kek
>>
>>56982289
I just need a card that outputs video, not for games but for multiple monitors.
The other option is RX 460.
GT cards are too underpowered.
>>
>>56982298
even $50 cards will give you 3-4 monitors
you dont need $150 one
>>
>>56982170
150$ in the usa, 250€ (~300$) in europe
c-can't wait....
>>
>>56981660
>Shouldn't it be a lot better even just from the 28nm to 16nm shrink?
That's the ONLY reason the 10 series is better, because of the die shrink. The transistor layouts of Maxwell and Pascal are identical.
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1