Would you rather?

I would install Linux(an acronym for Linux is not UniX)

File: image.webm (113KB, 1080x1445px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1080x1445px

/thread

>>56974853
Am I the only one amazed that the jpeg image presented in your webm was 110KB 600x480 while you have a 1080x1445 for 3 KB more?

>>56974896
Im retarded and dont konw what youre saying
What are you saying? Is this image of this quality not known? Like a rare high resolution version?

>>56974927
I'm saying that in your webm, there's a post which show as JPEG 600x480 which weights 110KB. Your image, compressed as a 2 seconds webm video, takes up 113KB, that is only 3 KB more while being 1080x1445 in size, which is like 3 times the resolution.

Am I the one retarded or does 2 sec webm yield a higher grade compression than JPEG? I mean why don't we all switch from JPEG to webm for images as well if they're so superior in term of compression?

I might be overthinking this, but damn.

>>56974988
oh, Im not him, I just stubled in here half asleep and couldnt figure out what you were saying.
For better compression set the speed to plecebo, the lowest setting. It allowes for higher compression.

Now I think Im having some sort of stroke or other brain malfunction, I cant type everything I type is jumbled and I have to keep going back and correcting it. Im going to bed now and hoping I dont died.

>>56974853
You have severe autism

File: webp_vs_jpg_comparison_50p.png (2MB, 1011x3032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1011x3032px

>>56974988
It would be better if we switched to WebP instead which uses an improved version of the VP8 video codec specifically targeted toward images.

However hiroshima won't allow webp so these still webms are the best that we've got right now.

You can make them too, it's not really that hard. Just install webm and run these scrips in directories with images:

JPG

for %%f IN (*.jpg) do (
ffmpeg -loop 1 -i "%%~nf.jpg" -an -c:v libvpx -qmin 40 -qmax 40 -quality best -t 2 -r 1  "%%~nf.webm"
)

PNG

for %%f IN (*.png) do (
ffmpeg -loop 1 -i "%%~nf.png" -an -c:v libvpx -qmin 40 -qmax 40 -quality best -t 2 -r 1  "%%~nf.webm"
)

>>56975080
>JPG encoder used: stock Gimp 2.8.16

>>56974853
a lot the things listed there are wrong. also the price of that micro sd lol

>>56975080
>it would be better ..
no, it would be better if we could zoom in and drag adn drop images in webm like we can in their native format
>gookmoot wont give us better formats
Gee, its almost like he doesnt care how much money this site blows through. Its pretty bad when the users care more about minimizing site costs than the fucking owner.

You could sell the Supreme brick and get a lot more than $50 in return, assuming it's in good quality.

>>56974853
>>56975080
I noticed that you can embed a webp image inside a PNG and 4chan won't remove it. I think that there could be a way to display the webp image if the PNG header was corrupted so the browser skips it when rendering the image.

>>56974853
I'm a huge Androidiot but
>shit res screen
>shit camera
Is bullshit.

File: toy camera.png (2MB, 1833x848px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1833x848px

>>56975232
nice meme