Which one do you preffer, a glossy or matte monitor screen and why?

One of both mustard race

Why would anyone pick glossy?

>>56965972
>why would anyone pick the panel with objectively superior colour depth and accuracy

Fuck off retard

>>56965925
>Mirror display or display display?
Display display of course.

>>56965996
enjoy having to consider the sun everytime you sit down

>>56965925
Is there a general monitor purchase guide to follow? How does one decide which monitor to pick?

>>56965972
better colours

>>56966051
>sun
What's that.

>>56965925
glossy, until matte looks glossy clean

>>56966060
resolution
size inches
colour garmet
refresh rate
input lag
bit depth
ports it uses
viewing angels
if diplay is glossy or the anti glare it uses
if it comes pre calibrated
which presents it has and how good they are

what's good glossy monitor under $200?

if i want a monitor with absolute god-tier DISPLAY QUALITY, should i go with dell ultrasharp?

is it also good for muh gaymin?

>>56966120
you haven't stated your peference such as resolution

>>56966136
well i'm gtx970 so i'll prob stick with 1080p.

i've heard of 1440p but it seems like a lame intermediate worth a skip until 4k is widely adopted

>>56966158
size?

>>56966177
at work atm but i think i currently got an asus vs239, which is 23"

so something around there, maybe a lil bigger. when i was a kid 22" crt was fuckhuge and 19" was nice, so i'm not quite sure what the go-to is nowadays

>>56966210
input lag tolerance?

>>56966222
damn man idk, i play street fighter so low?

i guess sfv gets about 6.5frame/60fps standard now so i'd want =<10ms?

i'm really a sucker for high picture quality, i just want my display to be really good at.. displaying things

Matte, I'm a photographer and editor. Drove me bonkers when iMacs went glossy.

>>56966255
port requirments?

Matt, so i don't have to see my ugly face

>>56966279
y u do dis

1 hdmi 1 dvi minimum

>>56966255
if you buy a monitor for gaming you want 5ms or lower

>>56966296
stand requirments? tilting? height ajustments?

>>56966320
none. it'll sit on top of a desk

>>56966310
alright, hopefully response time and picture quality don't have an inverse relationship.

>>56966355
bit depth?

>>56966365
k i get it, you're gonna lead me through the questionnaire you posted at >>56966101

and then go "lol ya get an ultrasharp"

well played m8, cuz i'm not bout to research bit depth and just wanted to be spoonfed an anon opinion on best pq display ;[

>>56966417
Unfortunatly if you want BEST IMGUR QUALITY you're not going to get it at 1920x1080 resolution because those monitors only goes up to 6 bit + FRC at best

>>56966509
k then what do i get

>>56966596
This is the best one I can find for 1920x1080, it has 100% sRBG color garmet, this is a high quality one from EIZO. Read the review and decide for yourself
http://www.photoreview.com.au/reviews/peripherals/monitors/eizo-coloredge-cs230-monitor

>>56966596
Also look at TFT Central, monitor reviews there to help you out little baby

glossy because i like the vibrancy

>>56965925
Matte, because glare fucking sucks.