Freetard Applies For A Job

>>56959492
You can't tell lies on the Internet, that's illegal.

>>56959492
>mad someone didn't ride the corporate cock for him
Pottery

Eat a sick Mr. Burns.

>>56959492
>> tfw my industry runs on exclusively c
Plus senpai excuse me.

File: csmajors.png (79KB, 694x801px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 694x801px

basically every competent programmer prefers vim or emacs over a clunky ide. you're probably a freshman in java 101. kys.

>>56959727
Riggins rekt bitchnizzle

>>56959727
A*B*undefined garbage *undefined garbage
returns variable thats overflowed several times

>>56959492
>ask him if he's familiar with Microsoft tools or Idea products
Epic company you ""work"" for, I would give a straight no and convince my fellow board not to hire you under any circumstances.

0/10

>>56961231
>Open k&r
>150 pages
>Search "undefined"
>36 instances

>Open my "meme" language book
>1000 pages
>Search
>14

What does it mean?

>>56961529
in C, when you declare a variable it sets aside a space in memory for it. The computers ram, has ofcourse been used before at some point.
If you dont set the memory to something before you call the variable it will read whatever the memory was last set to.
So if you type:
int x;
printf("%i", x);
god only knows what you might get. It could be anything from −32767 to 32767.
If you call it as something else, it will print some other random bullshit.

>>56961231
>you noticed the code is bad
that's the point you dip

>>56961529
>>56961579
I should also say that variables loop around, so if you do:
int x=32767;
x++;
printf(%i",x);
you should get "-32767"

Its been a while since Ive coded anything, years, so dont take everything I said as textbook fact. There is a variable whose range is something like 214767.......... but I cant seem to remember what It was.

>>56961579
I know how computers work. I was pointing out how weakly defined c is.

>>56961622
Then maybe don't ask what something means immediately after quoting a word.

>>56959492
hope you have a bit of guilt the time you hear one of those "freetards" kill themselves

>>56961613
Mostly correct. It would overflow to -32768, in a 16 bit integer. Also the word size is implementation dependant.

>>56961718
>Mostly correct.
eh, good enough. Overflowing variables isnt exactly a hobby of mine.

>>56961613
>>56961718
Also signed integer overflow is undefined behavior in C.

>>56961889
idk, seems pretty well defined to me. It just rolls over.

>>56962179
On most systems it will, but it's undefined in the C standard.

>>56964005
If nobody happened to write down that the sky appears blue, would we all insist that though the color of the sky appears blue to most users it still technically appears undefined?

>>56964087
Uh, what?
The sky is a physical thing with it's own existence that people describe. The properties of the sky are uninfluenced by whether people write down that it's blue or green.
C is fundamentally an agreed-upon specification. If the C spec said that adding 2 and 2 should return the integer 5, then all the C compliers which treat 2+2 as equalling 4 would simply be wrong.

>>56964087
no but we wouldn't write a program that relied on the sky being blue just to watch it fail when we happen to run it at sunset.

>>56961622
>weakly defined
>In mathematics, forall x: x / 0 is undefined
>Mathematics is weakly defined
Undefined behaviour is not weakly defined. "Undefined" is its definition.
The real shit comes in when you're talking about implementation defined.

>>56964154
the point
-------------
your head

hey OP it was me at the interview
i also saw that you lurk the 4chans, i left a note under your desk with a secret message
ill let everybody know what i wrote down
it says:


"OP is a huge faggot kys"

>>56964087
It's undefined because the representation of signed integers can differ between systems. It can be one's complement or two's complement. Thus the C standard doesn't define it. It isn't trivial.

What do you guys think about mentioning unprofessional work when asked for what you have made outside of the classroom?
For example, imagine you make a porn smartphone app for some sick fetish website and you get some serious programming experience from this, should you mention it?
Or if you make something for a complete niche, or something "immoral" that just allows you to cheat on websites or games or whatever, but you still wrote thousands of lines of codes for those projects.

>>56964178
There's no point because nobody uses signed integer overflow this way (not just because its not defined). Unsigned integer wrap-around is the only useful kind and that is defined.

>>56964227
xDDD

>>56959727
Autism.

>elaborate fizzbuzz
>vim cannot replace IDEs
>things that never happened
You tried.

The university I go to is all about Linux and VIM.

>>56959492
bet you don't even know which anime that tomato is from, you fucking faggot
kys

>>56959727
>basically every competent programmer prefers vim or emacs
lol
sure autismo

its the eclipse shills

>I need to take breaks between eating hotpockets and playing videogames
>where on the Internet shall I go?

>>56965436
For java it's really lame (and potentially unusable in some cases), but for C, it's totally okay and potentially more productive than say eclipse or net-bins.
t. java dev.

File: 80462491.jpg (36KB, 342x336px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 342x336px

>>56959492
>the world doesn't need a million C programmers
>implying they could actually program in C in the first place
>implying they could actually program

I use VS, pls giv me a job OhPee.

>>56959492
He wasn't interviewing for a job, he was telling you e wanted fries with his burger while he pacman -Syu'd his thinkpad, you zit-faced windows cuck.