What is your choice of software for running VMs on your Linux machines? Virtual Box or QEMU or am I retarded and there is something better that I just don't know about?
i use virtual box but bump for interest
i know there is also kvm
>>56955148
I use virtualbox because of the seamless mode and shared clipboards
Setting up KVM/QUMU is tedious
>>56955148
you mean thread ordering ? i lose hpet in bios and then basically run my terminal as a console
>>56955148
xen.
>>56955148
I use Qemu-KVM.
>>56955193
It's not at all tedious, you just write a script to start qemu stating the cores, memory, devices, iso, ect for the VM and run it.
I use VirtualBox because it just werks
>>56955193
>>56955304
You know there's libvirt and VirtManager for that, right?
>>56955148
Virtualbox if you want to virtualize desktops, especially if you want drag and drop between the VM and your desktop.
KVM qemu for most everything else. LXC/docker/OpenVZ are pretty fantastic for containers, but I don't use those as much right now.
>>56955304
Or just choose one of the predefined machine types instead of choosing each option individually.
>>56955304
>write a script
No, you use a GUI like Virt-Manager to control qemu.
I use kvm with virt-manager when I can. Easy, simple and works perfect.
Virtualbox works better with some guests (e.g kali) though. Must be because I suck at setting kvm.
>>56955148
Obviously bhyve.
Boxes and Proxmox.
VMware or kvm for me. Virtualbox disk io speed is terrible.
i dont run vms on my linux machines. my linux machines are vms.
>>56956079
Haven't seen drag and drop between the vm and the desktop. That would be more handy than the shared folders.
>>56957848
The fun is in doing it the other way around. That way you use the strength of linux as a server. Like a server with some applications and file management.