Manjaro or openSUSE?

>>56949340
KDE Neon

manjaro my man

>>56949340
>falling for the systemd meme

>>56949340
TrueOS

File: 4f59sT2s.jpg (32KB, 690x460px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 690x460px

>>56949358
>We use Ubuntu as a base for KDE neon because the KDE neon team feels it offers the best technology as a stable release and the best third party support.

>>56949340
Manjaro

Gentoo faggot

>>56949340
OpenSUSE. Arch forks are always buggy as hell and they break your installation to the point where you're better off just installing Arch itself.

>>56949395
Not being aware that Manjaro offers an option to switch to openRC anytime

>>56949340
OpenSUSE, tho in the beginning it might give you some headaches, also you need to recompile the kernel for nvidia drivers to work

In addition YaST is godlike

>>56949340
Gentoo.
With manjaro, X will break after your first update.
With opensuse, there won't be an X in the repos.

Note that arch and manjaro fags that say hurrr x doesn't break are in one of 4 categories:
- Complete denial
- Never restarts their machine so they would never know
- Never updates
- Only updates very selectively

>>56949636
>With manjaro, X will break after your first update.

Been using manjaro for a year now. X has never broken

>>56949788
And which category do you belong to?

>>56949340
Manjaro. SUSE is for enterprise cucks

>>56949523
This, I like Arch though.

>>56949792
>Complete denial
Well this is a little ironic to refute.
>Never restarts their machine so they would never know
Turn off my machiene every night
>Never updates
everytime new programs come out
>Only updates very selectively
I always update with pacman -Syu

So to answer your question,I don't fit into any of your shitty categories. You are incorrectly assuming that manjaro=arch when in fact, manjaro fixes the shitty repos on arch and uses it in their stable repos.

>>56949858
Ah, so you're in the complete denial category I see. Well, I won't keep you any longer, you "don't" have an X to repair after all, you must "not" be very busy.

>>56949868
It's called projection and strawmaning and you're doing both.

File: photo-64230.jpg (9KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 250x250px

>>56949858
>You are incorrectly assuming that manjaro=arch
manjaro is literally archlinux with a new look.

>>56949914
Wrong. Manjaro uses their own repositories. And Manjaro has a look while arch, by design, does not.

>>56949899
You must be an egyptian whale given how deep in the nile you are.

>>56949340
openSUSE
+better (corporate) backing than Manjaro, larger team
+snapper (system restore)
+automated testing
+know how to renew website certificates
+have both stable and rolling releases
+yast, proper gui for configuring system
-nvidia propr. drivers are a bit of a pain to do every kernel update
-not much howtos available while manjaro, because based on arch has awesome documentation
-smaller repository, you will miss a few things

>>56949931
No, they just hold back the packages. That's literally all they do. No testing whatsoever happens.

>>56949938
You must be trying to derail the argument. Or you think you've already won, can't be too sure.

>>56949948
they have forums for their testing updates that report bugs. They don't just "hold them back"

>>56949340

Manjaro is a lagging piece of shit with annoying little bugs.

It will drive you fucking insane until you finally switch to vanilla arch or antergos.

opensuse has year old packages. LOL muh stability.

OpenSuse Leap or Tumbleweed?

>>56949340
Manjaro, openSuSE is buggy as hell.

>>56950258

With Manjaro you are going to run into little bugs such as power management on a desktop turning itself on. In doing so makes chrome html5 video laggy.

Or you'll that turning on your box in the morning - it just won't boot. And you'll go fucking insane trying to figure out why because all you did was browse reddit the night before.

Manjaro has the ability to be a great system. Unfortunately I would not put it on any machine I would want to be stable.

I would use Antergos (I DO) which is just a GUI installer for Arch. It is ARCH all the way, no special packages or development team, etc.

I used Manjaro for about two months before finally getting tired of fiddling with it to get my box to run so I can watch youporn.

>>56950258
Am running Tumbleweed since 17-sept, have had zero issues caused by OS so far.
Usage: firefox, deadbeef, vlc, kodi, steam, virtualbox, running AMD GPU with in kernel driver.

How experienced are you in fixing Linux and more precisely RPM based distros?

Do you want to stay up to date and have latest version of software or do you want very stable but older?

OpenSUSE is really cool but repositories are kinda bare and outdated.

I recommend Manjaro or arch.
>le arch breaks every update xDD so does Manjaro xDD
These are shills. Ignore them.

>>56949963
yes and the testing is
>here you go guys
>it werks
wow weely, what a surprise
since it was already pushed by the blue maintainers in the non testing repos

>>56950679
Wrong again, the fourms find plenty of bugs, I would know because I get emails from the forums all of the time.

>>56950679
You have legitimately no idea what you are talking about.

May be true for less common packages, but you're making a mighty big stretch here.

>>56950700
>>56950720
so

gib links

>>56950848
take what you want from this thread, but this is the most recent thread dedicated to finding and working out the bugs to Manjaros' latest testing update.

https://forum.manjaro.org/t/testing-update-2016-10-03-kernel-v4-8-steam-openrc-python/10370/3

see for yourself i guess

>>56949340
neither

install solus

Antergos