Phone camera rate thread.
Fuck the file size limit edition.
All phones welcome!
>k6000 pro
>>56943132
K6000 pro again
is this where we dump large files to get the board deleted?
>>56943202
win jre lte i think or some general mobile phone
>>56943226
same phone probably i took photos with my friends phone and wit
>>56943239
i was on a trip thru italy
>>56943269
r8 my photography skills while youre here
>>56943275
>>56943297
>>56943313
this one is the windows phone one you cna tell from the filename
>>56943328
Rest of the photos are either not big enough or kill anonymity so have my old wallpaper instead
one of my only photos under file limit
1+1
>>56943174
And a night shot.
>>56943202
YEAH BOI
LG G3.
>>56943374
Lol I see my apartment complex
Huawei P9
>>56943638
yeah right
>>56943686
No it really is from my phone
>>56943638
pretty sure this was the marketing failure where the exif showed it was shot with a Canon 5D or something.
>>56943638
Next time take a picture of your DSLR's LCD screen with your phone.
>>56943638
nvm found it
>>56943741
I'm only triggered they call golden hour "low light conditions"
>1/800s f/4 ISO 500
If they actually did use a phone it would likely have been at base ISO.
Redmi 3
>>56943877
Cute doggy
>>56943275
7/10
Well hello there. Killing 4chan? I'm in!
IPhone SE
Holy fucking shit, I thought WebP was a meme but it turns out it isn't.
JPGs in this thread: 35.6MB
When converted to WebP: 7.33MB
Total file size reduction for entire thread: ~80%
https://my.mixtape.moe/svonhx.7z
Webp support for 4chan when?
>>56945913
What if every uploaded image got converted to webm or webp to decrease downloads bandwidth?
>>56946022
It'd probably just make a new problem of servers constantly being under heavy CPU load. Just allowing people to use Webp on 4chan would probably be enough to make half of users use the new format.
Remember when people bitched about Webm? Now like 10% don't use it.
>>56943686
>>56943712
>>56943741
filename didn't make it clear enough huh
iPhone 7+
>>56945769
>>56946175
Wrong board, faggots.
>>>/fa/
>>>/lgbt/
>>56946022
Fuck you and everybody like you. Support for formats is good. File size limits are reasonable and necessary. Re-encoding and/or lossy compression of uploaded images IS NOT OKAY.
>>56946229
>Re-encoding and/or lossy compression of uploaded images IS NOT OKAY.
Fuck off bloatgirls shill.
>>56946038
You mean 99% of people don't use it for images
iPhone 5S
>>56946274
Are you talking about webm or webp?
>>56946281
see >>56946196
Note 7
>>56946175
That looks like it could have been great but was compressed too much?
Can you upload a cropped image if file size is an issue?
>>56946329
>>56946196
Stop shilling lgbt here, it's not going to increase traffic, go back. >>>/lgbt/
ITT: blown highlights
>>56943132
>k6000 pro
Ayy, me too.
Pretty nice camera for a cheap phone with a big battery.
Xperia Z1
>>56946175
That's beautiful af
>>56946510
>>56946365
Thanks. It was a RAW file that was unedited and compressed to jpg then screenshotted to fit the upload limit. So with some actual processing it would actually look good I'm sure. Very impressed with the 7+'s camera.
>>56946467
And another, indoors now.
What's the current file size limit? I can't upload another image even though it's only 2.8MB.
>>56946525
>iPhone can shoot raw
Holy shit, i just might buy an iPhone 7s+ when it comes out if that's true.
K6000 again, god damn these file size limits are getting annoying
>iShit 6+
People seem to hype up the iP camera a lot but really it feels like these things just get shittier and shittier over time and I rarely get good pictures even outside like this, I mean look at that grainy shit.
>>56946622
>direct sunlight
>object is still in the shadows
It's not the phone's fault bruh
Lemme know
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1
Photo taken through a binoculars.
Redmeme Note 3
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1, again.
>this was taken with a Nexus S
Cameras have never been that bad honestly
>>56946893
Nexus S
>>56946906
>>56943132
y'all retards need to test the camera at low light conditions, otherwise is pointless
You're killing 4chan!
>>56946681
It is bruv
Nokia bluberry
Redmi note 3
>>56943132
Nexus 4
>>56948239
>>56945913
>Webp support for 4chan when?
When it's widely supported in all major browsers (so at least a decade or two).
Huawei P9
Simply great
Sony xperia z, yrs i know it's an old phone
>>56946353
Watch out he's got a bomb!
Nexus 6. It's a high quality, albeit slow camera.
>>56950519
Why the fuck would you be that close to an insect for so long?
>>56950519
I really like this.
>>56950760
Nice quality.
Unrelated/Judgement: Why do you have such a beautiful looking house and cars (colour debatable) but the driveway is so shitty sand/rocks and very poorly maintained lawn?
>>56950793
We live in a rural area and getting a long driveway totally paved is pretty expensive. So most people out here just flatten out a dirt driveway and give it some sparse rocks for structure. It's not ideal but in the price range it is.
The lawn isn't all like that, but a big patch got attacked by clovers that we had to poison. We recently dug in and piped a real sprinkler system so next season it should be looking mint.
>>56943132
g4
>>56943132
Back to /p/...
>>56950893
A nice picture but technically poor detail. What camera?
>>56943275
6/10 awkward framing and the colors are off.
>>56946175
What a shit camera. Ive seen better pics come out of a $200 point and shoot.
Redmi 3s
Gotta love the colors with this guy
>>56946175
Good detail but horrible color reproduction. Looks like an instagram filter.
>>56950899
The pics has been compressed.
Sony A6300
>>56950899
Also do you know anything about photography?
There is no need to over sharpen the pic(Like most modern smart phones).
>>56950914
Another one
>>56943132
>>56950927
Oh ok that makes sense lol. I was like "dat grain"
>>56950126
Chrome is the only major browser on 4chan though...
>>56950953
It was probably a shit edit on my part. I probably went a little cray cray with the grain in light room.
>>56950976
It's understandable. Nice pic. What do you think of the lower end model of that camera, a5000 I believe? I've been looking at one of those.
Nexus 6 low light.
Nexus 6 lower light. This picture has a funny story, I walked into my room and saw my nephew had done this. No idea what it is lol.
>>56951017
>low light
>literally a bright ass light bar in the background
>>56950943
And another one, not bad for a 130 € chink phone I think
ZTE Warp Elite
ISO: 100
JPG quality: 90%
Had to resave this as JPEG in paint because filesize was too large. Nexus 6 less than ideal light.
Nexus 6 movement. Here you can see how slow the camera operates.
Last one. Nexus 6 movement and low light. Tried getting you guys a good spread of conditions so you can see what it's like.
Another one from my Warp Elite.
JPG quality: 95%
ISO: 400
Exposure time: 1/68
>mfw I just realized you can change and lock exposure time on open camera
>>56946038
iPhone users can't view webm :¬)
Lumia 950
Warp Elite fag here again, I think this one is better.
JPG quality: 95%
ISO: 100
Exposure time: 1/26
>>56951009
Not worth it, save up for a a6000 its a excellent value. Also check KEH for a good deal. You can also check your local Best Buy for any open box items.
>>56951684
Still Lumia 950
>>56951017
Not bad, I kinda miss my nexus 6.
>>56951017
>low light
>bright af lamps above car
fucking retard
>>56946175
Damn
Seriously nice
Does the 7+ have the best camera on any phone?
HTC one M8
the 4MP ultrameme is pretty terrible.
Text me you aussie fuck, lol.
>>56951785
Has the worst low light imaging so, no. At least it has OIS unlike the pixlel.
Also taking photos with an iPhone is a horrible idea, they always come out shitty because of the internal compression iOS does and you have very limited control over the image sensor.
Hell even a sub-$100 Android phone is better than the 7+ just because of the controls.
see >>56951686
>>56946175
could that have anymore post processing.
One plus X
>>56951841
iPhone 7 has RAW
Can you guys post what ISO, JPG quality, and shutter speed was used like >>56951686 did?
I think it would help better judge photos.
>>56951861
That looks very nice trip
>>56951877
So do most android phones. Also it dose not mean shit if you don't have the means to edit it.
>>56951811
ISO: 160
shutter speed: 1/100
normal JPEG compression from stock camera application.
Note 5 (1)
Note 5 (2)
Note 5 (3)
>>56951934
This.
Also even the 7+ has dogshit quality in low light places. It's not just night scenes that look like ass but just a single shadow anywhere in the picture will look like shit. I'm honestly shocked people unironically recommend iPhones for their camera.
>>56943638
Fake photo aside, I used the P9 and honestly compared to the ifag7 +, Apple can eat shit
>>56952017
What are your qualifications?
>>56952010
the 7+ could have a decent camera if apple didn't try to cram the 2nd sensor in there, and i wouldn't be surprised if the 7 has a better camera,
Galaxy S4
>>56952023
10 years being a pap. (So i know my phone cam shit)
Taking the same fucking photo in same conditions and then noticing that the noise on IP7+ makes the photos unusable for anything but a instabitches ass.
>>56952086
Where is this?
>>56952100
I think you're talking shit to be honest mate
>>56952119
they've got a point though, as no pro photographer pap or not, no matter the situation a cell phone camera is going to be no match for a DSLR or even a ILC, as the processing is completely different, the sensors in phones are tiny so they need aggressive noise reduction and sharpening, the optics are pretty terrible even compared to a 16-50mm kit lens which gets bundled with entry level cameras, and phones are only really good enough for basic youtube vlogs and social media, as look even huawei had to bullshit the P9s promo shots with a 5D.
>>56952119
Ok. Just an opinion. Just saying that I'm using Huawei phones for a while now and that they pack a more than a decent punch when it comes to photo quality (over all performance is also great, could have a better screen tho)
>>56952215
The iPhone 7 camera is better than most DSLRs
>>56952247
HA, oh shit you're serious.
>>56952247
ahahahaha faggot
>>56946175
that's fucking disgusting and i'm not just saying this to shit on apple
>>56952247
Nice bait, I hope you don't believe this shit. I have a point and shoot from ten years ago thats takes better pictures than a i shit 7+.
Xperia Z2
>>56946281
I have an SE . How do you get it like that?
I guess I haven't messed with the camera so much desu
>>56952324
It really is. Way too many fucking filters. Never understood why people use them so much. Doesn't help that low light image capture is fucking dogshit on iPhones.
>>56943275
8/10
>>56952457
Pretty low standards m8. The composition is fucked the shadows are shit , and the subject is mediocre at best.
>>56952569
/p/ is kill it's getting moved to /art/
Nexus 6P. Amazing camera, but slow. Looking forward to getting a Pixel just for the increased speed. I do wish they'd gone with an f/1.8, though.
>>56952599
I've got a few good ones. I live in the Disney area so I get a ton of these.
>>56952584
Seriously? Ewww
>>56952569
Not even that guy, but it looks like a normal photo a tourist would take (I'm not implying you are; it's just how it looks).
You didn't try to frame it interestingly, is all. The pure black under the bridge stands out, too.
But the sky and the water look neat, and so do the paintings - I like their colours - hell, they look more realistic than your photo.
Redmi Note 3
>>56943132
>iphone 6s
>>56951906
Thanks anon.
>>56953264
No problem, any more?
>>56953197
Wtf is that shit
>>56952358
Tah-dig? Looks tasty.
Nokia N8
My experiment gone wrong
Phone is a trade secret
>>56953304
Yeah, and ghiemeh
>>56950943
How did you take the photo?
>>56953197
monkey want a banana?
>>56946571
so? LG G4 and others can do that as well
Xperia Z2
>>56947935
that's some weird ass distortion. Those buildings aren't straight.
>>56950773
It's 2cm big. Have lots of different spider pics. Huawei P9
>>56950773
>>56956323
Post all
>>56950769
Arthropods. They EAT insects.
>>56956352
Huawei p9
>>56956410
Do you have a special lens?
>>56956429
No. The one you quoted is with phone lens.
>>56956323
This is with a clip on macro.
>>56946175
Why does it look so dull? Isn't it supposed to be like mega Uber good?
>>56946281
The colors on iphone cameras look unnatural and weird, why is that?
>>56956429
Huawei p9 has great manual controls, manual focus. Love it.
>>56943132
>>56956448
>>56956478
Wow anon that is great. I might have to get me a macro for my Note 5 and go out and take more pictures of things like bugs, and shit.
>>56956497
Get an iPhone if you want to make great photos of shit. Bugs will be best suited for any android device.
>>56956523
Lol fuck off.
>>56956536
Actually me, my gf and my sis have huawei phones. No bugs ever. Love chinks
Honor 8 here
Xperia Z5
>>56946038
What if it was a clientside script?
Nexus 5X
>>56952610
>>56952599
HDR+ is fucking amazing for stuff like this. I have a panorama from a ferry in Croatia at sunset that shows the same affect, I'll try and dig it up
Nexus 6P
>>56956627
6P again
One plus 3
I'm not that good of a photographer. Still learning.
Rate my shit pls.
>>56956704
2/?
Don't know why, but I liked this one, though it's pretty shit.
>>56956721
3
Brownie points for anyone that can guess the city.
Nexus 6
>>56956756
And this too, Nexus 6. Decent pictures but fucking hell it was slow, and I always had to take two just incase it fucked up one for some reason
>>56956753
Just going off number 3, Prague maybe? Reminds me of that bridge in the north going into Old Town, but it seem a bit brighter than I remember
Nexus 6P
>>56956804
Nice guess, but nope.
It's in North America
Found one I liked.
sony z3c owner here. camera is terrible, picture quality is shit, to take nice picture you need literally ideal conditions, sunny day with zero cloud
dont fall for superb xperia camera meme
Lumia 640 XL
>>56957137 is correct
Here have a comfy sink cade
Taken with my old Z1 Compact, i'm currently using a Huawei Mate S which has a disgrace of a camera.
>>56957338
Forgot to say LG G4
>>56957345
Looks like some Nordic country
The only pic from my phone i have on my PC
Moto G 2015
>>56957376
You're right. It's taken in Norway about 30 minutes from where i live. Took this one on my trip to Canada back in 2014.
>>56955278
Yeah so does my nexus 5, but iPhone 7 has a better camera than a g4 or nexus 5
Lizzardbro with half a tail
Note 4
iPhone 6+
>>56957583
6S Plus*
Also posting from mobile a shit
Another Note 4
>>56957602
nice tree anon! you know what it is? I really liked it, shit camera tho, colors seem faded