The GNU is a lie.

It wasn't the jew after all, but the GNU

I will call it linux until I die.

Linux is okay if you are mentioning the kernel. But for an Operating System use the format: Distro_Name GNU/Linux, unless the Distro does not use any GNU utils, libs, tools. Then the format Distro_Name Linux is okay.
The reason to say GNU/Linux is to bring in more people to the GNU project, and this is important for releasing and mantaining the quality of GNU software, the software necessary for building a full operating system.

>>56942062
Yeah, but fuck the GNU project.

>>56942100
Yeah fuck that piece of software i depend on to shitpost. God. Do not fall for the meme of the BSD and proprietary licenses, GNU is great for something that needs to work, must be secure, and free of any kind of intervention. Please inform yourself about the GNU Project, understand it, maybe even help a little.

>>56940243
>Calling it GNU/Linux is justified
I knew it

Calling it "GNU" is a meme.

>Linux is a Unix-like and mostly POSIX-compliant computer operating system (OS) assembled under the model of free and open-source software development and distribution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux

It's named Linux on wikipedia. The consensus the community reached.

Try to change the name on Wikipedia and see what happens?

inb4 >but LOL EVERYONE CAN EDIT SO IT?S WORTHLESS LOL

Can you give me ONE SINGLE example of a MAJOR Wikipedia article containing such a huge error, IN THE TITLE on first sentence definition ?

Just one?

>>56942152
You're mistaking GNU with hardworking software developers who naively fall for the foss meme and drink Comrade Stallman's koolaid down by the pitcher load. GNU just latches on to anything decent it sees and won't let go like a barnacle on a boat's hull, it only exists to tickle lazy autist Stallman's ego and give him an unwarranted sense of self-importance.

File: quote.jpg (16KB, 578x199px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 578x199px

>Just created an os
>won't be big and professional like gnu
>os
>like gnu
Sounds like gnu is an OS, too.

>>56942195
>Can you give me ONE SINGLE example of a MAJOR Wikipedia article containing such a huge error, IN THE TITLE on first sentence definition ?
Is that what you write in your essay?

Oh you don't, you are just a dropout

>>56942062
>"Full operating system"
Consider suicide

>>56941158
>>56942062
>>56942164
>>56942195
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you’re referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.


Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called “Linux”, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use.


Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called “Linux” distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.

He also said Stallman is doing more harm than good to the Linux.

Linus is one sexy bitch. The hobo has to go.

>>56942062
Thank you Mr. Stallman for that wonderful comment.