[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Jewgle Pixel hate thread

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 98
Thread images: 9

File: jewgle_phone.png (539KB, 770x2013px) Image search: [Google]
jewgle_phone.png
539KB, 770x2013px
So can we all agree that this piece of shit is the biggest tech disappointment in 2016?

Also, I updated the comparison to reflect the confirmed no micro SD slot on the Pixel.
>>
>>56939616
The Pixel is sold on its software and the camera.

It's actually a good phone for the regular iPhone demographic, that being dumb normalfags.
>>
No keyboard NO SALE!!!
>>
The camera on the Pixel is superior to that of all other smartphones. Moreover, the equivalent to the Axon 7 would be the XL since they would be of the same size class. It's retarded to compare a phablet battery with a smaller phone. You also seem to have ignored any specs where the Pixel comes on top, which gives me a tiny hunch that this isn't sincere.
>>
>>56939616
>The only thing that matters in cameras is the megapixels
You're the reason modern phones are shit
>bigger numbers = better
>>
>>56939616
>ZTE
Stop shilling one of the shittiest chink brands
>>
>>56939616
>non removable battery

What's the point? Keeping my s5.
>>
>>56939616
>Android 7.1
>Android 6.0.1
>equivalent

fucking hell I hate piXL too but you need to shill somewhere else chink
>>
>Only highlight the points where the Pixel fails
>Don't highlight where the Pixel has advantages
retard
>>
>>56940521
Where do you see any advantages?
>>
>>56939936

shut the fuck up
>>
>>56940559
Uhh...it's slightly lighter and got a newer lagdroid version?
>>
>>56939616
>compares a 5" phone with a 5.5" phone.
You can't even shill correctly.
>>
>not comparing with the XL
>all that irrelevant shit

What is good about the pixel is the software. Is the axon ever getting android 7?
>>
>>56940559
>better screen
>better camera
>better build quality
>no Chinese backdoor
>better software
>better support
>better design
Also you are specifically ignoring the pixel+
>>
>>56939616
>5" to 5.5"
>Doesn't put green for the pixels better wifi and bluetooth
>Doesn't put green for the pixels better sensors, barometer
>Doesn't put green for the pixels better weight
>Doesn't put green for the fucking 820 vs 821
Fuck off retard
>>
>>56940463
He is the same guy that said Xiaomi is a shit brand.
>>
>>56940632
>software
Just replace it
>Chinese backdoor
Google backdoor
>design
Subjective
>build quality
Probably yes, but that's what you sacrifice for buying a device for almost half the price
>screen
I'll give you that one. Anything beyond 1080p on phones is a terrible meme.
>support
Officially yes, but who needs that? People rarely update their Android OS from my experience.
>camera
But 20>12

>>56940696
>barometer and weight
>relevant

I'm not trying to shill ZTE, they are terrible, I'm just saying you get more per $ spent. But if you're buying a chinkshit device either buy a cheap one for $200 or less, which will last a year at least, or get a better quality one which will last longer. ZTE phones are overpriced for their quality and start decaying after 6 months, wasting more than a hundred bucks on them is stupid. Speaking from a lot of experience with ZTE here.
>>
>>56940821
>20>12
in your dreams retard
>>
>>56940821
>more megapixels is better

Probably about to order the axon but you're stupid mate
>>
ITT: paid google shills defending pixel turd
>>
>>56939859
>The Pixel is sold on its software and the camera.
Axon 7 is getting Nougat and the camera lacks an OIS, you know the thing that makes taking photos with your smartphone bearable?
>>
>>56940037
You're right but in this case the lack of a OIS is ahuge problem for the pixel.

>>56940463
>>56940757
xiapdijfapsoifdjapofd is fucking garbage, nobody trust them except for chinks them selve but only because they plan to replace their cheap shit every few months. ZTE is the most trusted chinkshit brand around.
>>
>>56940696
>>5" to 5.5"
There's no point in comparing it against the $800 pixel xl. By then you could literally buy 2 axon 7 phones and still get better specs like expandable storage.

>>Doesn't put green for the pixels better wifi and bluetooth
Source?

>>Doesn't put green for the pixels better sensors, barometer
Source?

>>Doesn't put green for the pixels better weight
Difference is pretty minor.

>>Doesn't put green for the fucking 820 vs 821
Difference is pretty minor, like 5% at best.
>>
>>56940500
Axon 7 is getting 7.1 you retard

http://www.androidauthority.com/zte-axon-7-updated-android-7-0-nougat-pipeline-717314/
>>
zte axon 7 cheapest one on Amazon is for £470 which is $600
try again
>>
>buying phones that don't run their own software
kys freefag
>>
>>56941364
>euroshitter

400 shipped in freedom land
>>
>>56941242
Axon 7 camera is mediocre at best you stupid poorfag. There's more to a camera than muh megapixels
>>
>>56940616
Comparing the Axon 7 to the $900 pixel XL is extremely humiliating, OP is doing you a favor.

>>56940620
see>>56941353

>>56941364
>amazon is the only one seling it
https://www.zteusa.com/axon-7
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16875705055

fucking dumbass
>>
Just wait for the price to go down
>>
Wtf is google thinking
>>
>>56941400
It has OIS which puts it above the pixlel camera you retard. Nobody is going to fucking use a tripod with their phone so not have OIS is really really huge disadvantage.

Also Axon 7 photos scaled down to 12MP look miles better than pixlel photos.
>>
File: skeleton.jpg (84KB, 600x380px) Image search: [Google]
skeleton.jpg
84KB, 600x380px
>>56941415
>>
>>56941406
My point is that they don't have the same target audience so it doesn't make sense to compare them. People can't choose their hand size.
>>
And in addition to all the downsides, the Pixel is only available on Verizon in the US, by far the worst cell phone company unless you live in Bumfuck, Nowhere and they're the only choice.
>>
>>56941435
T-thanks senpai
>>
>>56941406
>zteusa
>usa
>newegg is usa only

fuckig dumbass
>>
>>56941419
I think google is trying to replace apple completely. Good plan if you ask me, buisness is buisness you know?

>>56941447
True but comparing the XL vs the Axon 7 is still pretty pointless since very few peole will get them. I understand there is a size difference but it's really not that much (10%) but people still love sperging out over the small things I guess.
>>
>>56941490
>your third world country matters
k
>>
>>56941490
http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_sacat=0&_nkw=zte+axon+7&LH_PrefLoc=2

Here, dipshit, do you need help ordering it too?
>>
>>56941510
you don't even know where Europe is you murrican shitter
>>
File: IMG_20161006_083333_693.jpg (764KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20161006_083333_693.jpg
764KB, 1440x1080px
>>56941424
How unsteady are your hands?

I just took pic related on a $150 chinkphone with no ois, eis, or dis in the camera, so what's your excuse?

Had to screenshot and crop because of the stupid filesize limit.

>axon 7 photos scaled down to 12MP look miles better than pixel photos
No. Especially not in low light.
>>
>>56941470
That only applies if you go retail for phones at cell carrier stores. If you're willing to buy full price online/at retail (Target, Best Buy, etc.) or are willing to finance with Google, you can use it on any major US carrier.
>>
File: image.jpg (134KB, 680x709px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
134KB, 680x709px
>>56941470
This. I'm getting an Axon 7 to replace my iPhone. Can't wait to laugh at all the pixlelfags that cry about not having enough storage on their phone capable of recording 4K video and paying out the ass for cellular service. At least it's not meme fi.
>>
File: embarrassing.png (74KB, 184x183px) Image search: [Google]
embarrassing.png
74KB, 184x183px
>>56941528
>mfw Americans think Europe is a country
>>
>>56941547
Dude, it's one of the biggest and best ones. Its right above Africa
>>
>>56941495
>I think google is trying to replace apple completely. Good plan if you ask me, buisness is buisness you know?

It's a terrible plan, because Google isn't Apple. Only Apple can get away with charging $900 for a substandard piece of hardware, because they've spent decades marketing their shit as the "high end". Why the fuck does Google think they can just waltz into the market and immediately establish a similarly parasitic relationship with their customer base? This is like Facebook trying to move into classifieds, it's pure hubris.

You don't see HP making $2000 laptops with one port. You don't see Audio Technica selling $500 headphones that cost $5 to manufacture. Because they understand that to sell their product, they need to market to their own customers, not someone else's.

Nobody wants a $900 Android phone that can barely compete with $400 phones that run the exact same software. Android users won't use it because it's subpar, Apple users won't use it because it's Android. This is going to flop so hard and the retards at Google who planned this probably still won't understand why.
>>
>>56941532
>How unsteady are your hands?
Unless you were genetically gifted there is a 99.999% chance that you will jerk around a little when you take a picture with your smartphone. Even movements in the mm range are enough to fuck up a photo.

>Had to screenshot and crop because of the stupid filesize limit.
You're that retarded that you can't just give us a mixtape.moe link? wow

>>axon 7 photos scaled down to 12MP look miles better than pixel photos
>No. Especially not in low light.

Hmm huh

Anyway I have a DSLR and always use high ISO and shutter speed values to avoid having to use a fucking tripod. You don't even get to use ISO values above 1600 on most phones so OIS is a must. In fact it's common knowledge that the only way to take a good photo on a smartphone is to either set the ISO to 1600 if no OIS or set the ISO to 100 if OIS is available. Guess which one looks better?
>>
>>56941621
this
except they could succeed if they wold choose samsung way. Build brand and improve its recognition before you try push a premium devices with premium price point. Otherwise every normie having to decide between "Some google phone" or iphone will choose latter.
>>
File: c77.jpg (29KB, 300x260px) Image search: [Google]
c77.jpg
29KB, 300x260px
>>56941645
>ISO values above 1600

Meh, my camera works fine without ois and I rarely get blurry images. You need to reduce your sugar intake if your hands tremble that much kiddo.
>>
>>56939616
>ZTE

Into the trash it goes
>>
>>56940757
>Xiaomi is a shit brand.

Well it is.
>>
>>56941709
thinking about replacing my Xiaomi redmi note 2 for this zte axon 7
is it worth it?
>>
>>56941621
>>56941662
Apple marketshare has been steadily dying you know. A lot of people want off the apple train. This means there will be a ton of people looking for something "premium" but not an iPhone. I believe there is a growing market for overpriced android phones so good on google to not miss the opportunity to make bank.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/266136/global-market-share-held-by-smartphone-operating-systems/

~5 years ago iPhones were over 20% marketshare and now they're dipping down to 10%
>>
>>56940757
But it is. My redmi 3 lasted 2 months before shitting itself.

>>56941724
LeEco Le Max 2 64GB model would be a better choice, or zuk z2 if not an americunt
>>
>>56941695
Recommend something better then.

>>56941709
This.

>>56941724
Definitely. ZTE has been around for a really long time so they know what they are doing.

>>56941742
These brands are literally worse than xiakajdopslfmmi, you might as well tell anon to kill himself.
>>
>>56941734
Marketshare is based on percentages. While you might be under the impression that iPhone users are abandoning their devices for Android in droves, what's actually happening is Google has done a better job at tapping into emerging markets, selling to people who previously didn't own any smartphone.
>>
>>56941734
the reason why apple is "losing" market share is that third world mobile market expands. Pajeets gonna buy low to mid range android phone, not a new iphone. It doesn't really mean apple is losing costumers.
>>
File: image.jpg (99KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
99KB, 1280x720px
>>56941742
>LeEco Le Max 2 64GB model would be a better choice
>>
>>56941798
>>56941799
Then explain this:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2016/09/26/peak-iphone-first-weekend-sales/#3d3d159e4f6a
>>
File: .png (202KB, 1583x965px) Image search: [Google]
.png
202KB, 1583x965px
>>56939616
Sadly, ZTE is currently in an unusable state.
>>
>>56941862
>it's unusable because I can't put muh rice ROMS on it

Yeah the op3 has way more support but it's not unusable.
>>
>>56941846
>http://www.forbes.com/sites/ewanspence/2016/09/26/peak-iphone-first-weekend-sales/#3d3d159e4f6a
Do you understand the concept of market saturation? Everyone in the west already owns a smartphone and doesn't need a new one every year, it's the same thing that happened when laptops matured.

Yes, some people switch between platforms. A friend of mine went from iPhone to Android, my parents did the opposite. But there's no mass exodus from one to the other, just a pattern of one company dominating the new markets and both seeing diminishing returns in established ones. It's real basic product lifecycle stuff.
>>
>>56941868
Stock ROM is unusable, m8, and that CM is
>Not Working:
>Audio
>Fingeprint Sensor
>NFC
>Sensors
>>
>>56941879
Why is the stock rom unusable?

Yes cm is a work in progress.

I have heard of some odd things on the stock rom but it doesn't seem like enough to warrant the op3 over it.
>>
>>56941889
this
>>
>>56941879
I call BS on that, I have CM14 on my OP2 and everything works, doubt that OP3 version is so bad at this point
>>
>>56941688
>he thinks he is the human tripod over here
>>
>>56941889
Wanting to get more than one major Android version update is enough to get OP3. Hardware stopped being an issue since SD800 ages, but software situation is still very bad.
>>56941913
It's about Axon.
>>
>>56941934
oh sry, that makes more sense
>>
>>56941934
I don't see any reason to think op3 will be any better than the Axon, especially after they fix up cm for it.

Maybe a little better because of other rom choices but official support? I don't see it.
>>
>>56941242
>OIS, you know the thing that makes taking photos with your smartphone bearable?
I wouldn't know because I don't have Parkinsons.
>>
>>56941951
>I don't see any reason to think op3 will be any better
It's ALREADY better. Because OnePlus themselves help ROM devs. It's even better than Nexus honestly.
>>
>>56941645
>Anyway I have a DSLR and always use high ISO and shutter speed values to avoid having to use a fucking tripod. You don't even get to use ISO values above 1600 on most phones so OIS is a must. In fact it's common knowledge that the only way to take a good photo on a smartphone is to either set the ISO to 1600 if no OIS or set the ISO to 100 if OIS is available. Guess which one looks better?
You mean you can't take a blur free photo at 1/30 without some form of IS?

You need to get checked out.
>>
>>56941970
Alright I believe you, still don't think it's enough to warrant the op3 over the axon 7 with the axons screen, speakers and expandable storage.
>>
>>56941970
Man I'd buy a op3 if not for the lack of a micro sd slot. Really disappointed in them for that. By next year 256GB micro SD cards will probably drop to $100 a piece.
>>
>>56939616

My Motorola Moto G has a 2470 mAh battery. it cost me £100.

Only a dumbass would waste money a Jewgle Pixel.

Way better phones on the market for way less money.

And they don't blow up or catch fire.
>>
>>56941991
Valid points, I prefer Axon's design as well.
>>
>>56941980
I don't use a tripod when I take photos you mong. This is why I love DSLRs so much, you can just up the shutter speed/ISO and images will always look good despite not using a fucking tripod.

Anyway my main point is getting a smartphone without OIS is beyond fucking retarded since you will always jerk a little which fucking ruins your photo unless you set the ISO to 1600 but then you have to deal with all that shitty noise that's impossible to fucking edit out.
>>
>>56941980
>I never zoom my photos
>>
File: 1475694903771.png (564KB, 770x2013px) Image search: [Google]
1475694903771.png
564KB, 770x2013px
>>56939616
I filled in some of the stuff you "forgot".

Enjoy not have bands 18, 32, 39. Also have fun not having roaming bands (on both US and international bands). And finally bask in your lack of 3x3 carrier aggregation, providing you with slow band hand-offs and less bandwidth.
>>
>>56942239
>better talk time with less battery
Legit :^)
>>
>>56942260
lmao this, google shills are being careless today.
>>
>>56942050
You don't need a tripod to take images at 1/30 you retard.
>>
>>56942260
It's from doze in the new version of android. Those are the stats listed by the manufacturers(for both phones).
>>
>>56942276
>talk time
>doze
>>
>>56942260
It's to power the giant screen and retarded resolution.
>>
>>56942284
You're being retarded on purpose.
Stop it.
>>
>>56942313
>talk time
>giant screen
>>56942316
Do you even know what it does?
>>
>>56942316
>he thinks Doze effects battery life anytime other than when your phone is idle
No, John. You are the retards.
>>
>>56942284
Remind me again, did the Axon support VoLTE when it first came out(when they published battery stats)? And did any carriers approve it? And how long will the Axon be stuck with outdated software libraries for calling? Does it even get baseband updates?
>>
>>56942372
Axon 7 is a joke.
>>
>>56942133
I have a 24Mp camera, I just crop.

>>56942050
I don't use a tripod either except for macro, time lapse and long exposure shots. You shouldn't need IS until well under 1/100
>>
>>56942427
You shouldn't need IS until under 1/30
>>
>>56942414
t. goole shill

>>56942472
shut up you retard
>>
So I didn't bother doing any research

What is so exciting about this one phone that every phone coming out every other week until now this year doesn't have already
>>
>>56942665
A google logo
Thread posts: 98
Thread images: 9


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.