iPhone 7 battery life worse than Galaxy S7, LG G5 and HTC 10

File: fucking_poorfags.jpg (64KB, 398x394px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 398x394px

>lagdroid
Not surprised you can pull better battery life when you poorly perform and have less functionality

>>56931398
ayylmao

can you guys honestly report how many minutes you spent on the phone (3G call time) in the past month?

in my phone's lifetime (of 2 years, unless "lifetime" means something else), i've apparently spent about 2.25 days in calls.

the 3G internet use statistic is more damning. even a relatively slight dip (compared to the LG G5) is pretty bad. compare to the HTC 10 and it's really clearly bad. but pointing to call time makes you look out of touch. like it's shit at receiving faxes as well. do you think anyone under 30 cares?

whenever i have a "long" call i grab a cable and plug it in to the phone. i also grab my earbuds so i can just speak into the microphone without holding the phone up to my head. basically, i settle in. in the rare instances that telephone calls are important to me, i already independently have a use case that makes the top row of statistics unimportant to me.

>>56932254
Holy shit, the excuses iFags will make

>I plug in my phone with a cable while making calls

May as well use a landline at that point

File: Then+you+should+probably+consider+suicide+_285bf02335a8e053537f7e3d6e34e438.jpg (27KB, 840x405px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 840x405px

>>56931398
>smaller phone has smaller battery

Really? Intragdesting...

>>56931475
how are they poorfags if the pixel costs more

>>56932316
a simple "no i don't want to" would suffice.

File: forward-phone-calls-to-google-voice-grandcentral.jpg (23KB, 432x269px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 432x269px

>>56932316
>May as well use a landline at that point
Yeah. That would be pretty stupid.

>>56931475

What is race to idle?

Also:

> Android device has less functionality than iPhone

Repeat that a few times very slowly so you can hear yourself saying it.

>>56931398
topkek

>nearly 12 hours of talk time
>not enough

>>56931475
>Android
>less functionality
What are you even talking about? And it's rare to find an android phone which lags nowadays.
Gr8 b8 m8

>>56931398
External batterys or battery cases dude.

>>56934251

That's for patching bad phones.

It's like recommending a tow truck for a bad car.

File: Capture+_2016-10-01-20-12-06.png (2MB, 1440x2392px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2392px

As a LG G5 owner this makes me happy

>>56931398

>Let's first compare battery life based on a completely unrealistc scenario - Talking on the phone till it dies - and where Android flagships will inherently do better because there's no hardware/software optimization possible so biggest capacity wins
>Then, do a comparison on a more realistic scenario - internet browsing until it dies - but let's keep the same ceiling and color coding of the previous test to mask how closer the results are this time around

>Oh, and don't forget to put the smaller 7 instead of the 7+. Don't want the iPhone to actually get a better result on the second test, after all!

>>56931398
Meanwhile my chinkphone gets 3000 minutes talk time per charge

File: Google Pixel Cheerleaders.jpg (349KB, 1378x1008px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 1378x1008px

Into the trash iPhone 7 goes

and OUT OF THE TRASH, the new, Google Pixel Phone. The very best smartphoone available! Superior inbred design of 3 chink phones and an iPod touch!And a 2 cm bezel containing NOTHING, MINIMALISM!

Google Pixel Phone is the official smartphone of the Indian 2017 Cricket Team!

>>56934519

Cool story bruh! : ^ )

>>56934584

>I have no counterargument so here's a stock dismissal

: ^)

>>56931398

>deliberately comparing the smaller iPhone 7
>they literally DID NOT want to pit the similarly sized 7 Plus against those other phones

Something awfully fishy here, why would they do that?

>>56934582
cherrypicking

>>56934582

Pixel could very well replace the iPhone since it's marketed for illiterate brand whores who think $$$ means quality.

Also Pixel is a cute name that sounds a bit like pixie so girls and homosexuals may indeed fall for it. If that happens Apple is dead and burried.

>>56934519
Wouldn't 7+ die sooner due to larger screen? Isn't that why any phone beyond 1080p dies fast?

>>56934699
for 3G call time, probably not. for internet use, it would probably be a wash (or a slight negative, but not a huge loss) because the battery is bigger.

>>56934699

What >>56934710 said. Also, even for internet browsing, the extra 940mAh (that's almost 50%+ from the standard 7) would compensate.

File: 78203.png (32KB, 600x500px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 600x500px

>>56934699
>>56934710
>>56934732

Based on last year's model, Plus still has the advantage.

Pic related also reminds me of something else that's fishy with OP's comparison: They used 3G instead of LTE - 3G is significantly less energy efficient than LTE, so it would skewer results towards biggest batteries.

>>56934699

If it's a prehistoric backlit IPS panel (like iPhones) then yes. A phone with current decade tech has less problems but more pixels always use more energy.

>>56934642

>I think normies will buy some disgusting Pajeet phone if its just priced high
>I live somewhere which had <50% iPhone usage (aka, irrelevant poor shithole)

There's no 'types' for iPhone buyers anymore friend, the iPhone is the standard phone for everyone, has been for some time. You'd know if you left your village.

>>56934642

>Also Pixel is a cute name that sounds a bit like pixie

People don't buy smartphones based on name you fucking moron.

>>56934799
Sure. Tell me how marketing doesn't put any effort in coming up with a name at all.

>>56934770
Yes, there is a 'type'. Only a very small group selects a iPhone because of technical reasons (specs, UI, etc).

One type is (You) who thinks iPhone is just a synonym for smartphone, like old people and just don't know any better.

Another type is girls who need to make a fashion statement and using it like a piece of jewelry.

iPhone is most popular in lower classes where social pressure is high.

>>56934932
>iPhone a synonym for smartphone
Living in USA sounds terrible.

>>56934799

Yes they do.

>>56934932

The sales figures and global, almost universal love for the iPhone don't quite match your out-of-touch neckbeard opinions.

>Another type is girls who need to make a fashion statement and using it like a piece of jewelry

Its not 2007. This is how I can identify you're a Pajeet. As I said, any normal western nation has an almost 50/50 split of iPhone and high tier Android phone, neither has a 'type'. I've seen hot bimbos using both platforms, autistic losers using both, business types using both. Your knowledge on social situations hasn't been updated for the last 10 years.

>>56934764
>>56934519
>I don't like these benchmark
>Let's remove all benchmarks that shows that battery capacity taking a effective because I'm butthurt that muh 700-600 dollar phone doesn't have the option to have bigger better capatcity.

Software/Hardware Optimization battery benchmark between Android vs IOS is retarded if you care about is "real world" performance. Android has mutiple to performance below stock phones that make these tests useless.

File: s164245916.jpg (25KB, 150x150px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 150x150px

>>56934764
Meanwhile the Redmeme 3 Pro's battery shitting on all of those phones.

>>56931398
ayylmao

>>56931398
that's only the version with the Intel modem (Intel's first major modem win) and unsurprisingly Intel's modem sucks compared to Qualcomm, which everyone else uses.
wonder how much Intel payed Apple.

>>56938414
ironically Intel is one of the first doing 14nm modems.
those other phones prolly still use 28nm modems, tho integrated into the Snapdragon SoC.

File: rn3p.jpg (92KB, 1080x960px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1080x960px

>>56937346
I know that first hand fampai

>>56931475
Actually, the last update of HTC10 make it faster than iphone 7 in every app except games lunching like .1 seconds.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wbdydv0_Itg

>>56931475
>less functionality
I can move files from and to my phone without itunes, can you?

ayylmao

>>56939218
yes, when was the last time you used an iPhone?

Is Apple finished?
>Poor battery life
>Not really water proof
>no headphone jack
>Lost camera top spot
>Expanding batteries

Did I miss anything?

>>56934799
That's literally what Apple does. Or do you honestly think people like dealing with iTunes?

>>56940636
Snakes inside. And a decade old defect that makes it impossible to transfer arbitrary files to/from PCs without installing third party tools first called iOS.

File: 1461143079507.png (302KB, 1276x1260px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1276x1260px

>>56939182
>HTC 10 has awesome performance and great standby battery life, excellent durability, unlockable bootloader, SD card slot
>But the WLAN drivers are fucked up and make the wifi kill the battery
HTC PATCH THIS SHIT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>56931398
>HTC
feels goodman

>>56934519
>Then, do a comparison on a more realistic scenario - internet browsing until it dies - but let's keep the same ceiling and color coding of the previous test to mask how closer the results are this time around
The iPhone 7 battery is 34% smaller than the 3000 mAh battery of the HTC 10.
The iPhone 7 has 22% less 3G internet browsing time than the HTC 10.

That seems about right. Even behind its optimizations it still sees very poor usage.

I'm sure the 7+ is another story, being only 3% smaller than the HTC 10.

>>56940735

Holy shit, is it possible to be this retarded? Mention iPhone and yes people pull out their wallets because THEY KNOW WHAT IT IS, its a 9 year running device, they're not buying it every time with a wiped memory because the name of the product sounds le quirky you fucking idiot. Nobody has ever blindly bought a product they know nothing about because it has an interesting name. Take more English classes.

ayylmao

File: venus.jpg (109KB, 700x1005px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 700x1005px

>>56931398
why are they comparing a small phone to large phones? of course iphone7 will have less battery because it's a smaller phone.

why didn't they compare it to iphone7+?

>>56942342
>cuckPhone poster

>>56937028
>Let's remove all benchmarks that shows that battery capacity taking a effective because I'm butthurt that muh 700-600 dollar phone doesn't have the option to have bigger better capatcity.

It's called the iPhone 7 Plus and it has already been stated multiple times that it should have been the model in the comparison, so...

>>56931398
How will Applel ever recover?

>>56939218
What is unexplored? It just needs iTunes installed for libraries and it handles everything else.

>>56931398
Moron. It's a smaller phone. It has less space for battery

>>56932254
>I plug my phone in
>I also plug in earphones

Not with the iPhone7 you don't

>>56934764
This chart is wrong as fuck.
I can't get more than 4-5 hours on my LG G4.

>>56940636
apple is finished since 2014 at least, when the iphone 6 first came out. coincidentally also when I first started browsing 4chan. funny, innit m8?

iCuck status
[] not btfo
[x] btfo

>>56934932
When the competition is as poor as android, of course the iPhone is synonymous with a smartphone.

t. Android user

I don't get why you people come onto /g/ to tell people that apple sucks. You're preaching to the choir and it's barely technology-related. At this point it's just consumerism. I've begun to take up apple's side just because you android faggots are so insufferable. Embarrassing.

>>56946598
>It just needs iTunes installed

kek

>>56948530
>I don't get why you people come onto /g/ to tell people that apple sucks

Easy explanation: Because Apple shills, I mean users, come here and feel entitled to a warm welcome. Instead, they should feel bad about being such queers.

>>56934975
It is.

File: NARUTO.full.458217.jpg (816KB, 700x1990px) Image search: [Google]

816KB, 700x1990px

>>56931398
>3G call

For what purpose?

>>56934582
Minimalism would be a small bezel

>>56946598
> It just needs iTunes installed
kek

>>56947313
>iCuck in full damage control mode
Kek

>>56934975
if you wake up every day and assess the quality of your life by what synonyms people use for stuff, then i guess this might be a potential landmine

>>56948586
higher quality than 2G (even HD voice possible)
widely available not like VoLTE
actual interoperable standard not like VoLTE

Nobody calls over 3G

Muh Nexus 6P has a pretty good battery and the charging speed is insane

>>56934309
How is the phone?
Sister wants to buy a new device, but Samsung prices are off the charts, and Sony has no removable battery, HTC is not sold at carrier...

So yeah, that leaves LG.

File: [HorribleSubs]_Ao_no_Kanata_no_Four_Rhythm_-_01_[1_2016-01-13_00-48-20.png (484KB, 513x837px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 513x837px

>>56946598
>It just needs iTunes installed

>>56931398
Pixel is a better HTC 10. Here's to a good battery life

>open game on lagdroid takes 10 minutes
>open game on iphone takes 2 seconds
>export 4k from lagroid takes 2 hours
>export 4k from iphone takes 2 seconds

>>56948385
Only poorfags buy wired headphones, Sennheiser, Audeze and any serious company already makes Bluetooth headphones that cost thousands of dollars

>>56952983
>>open game on lagdroid takes 10 minutes
>>open game on iphone takes 2 seconds
> Mom, I will be in my room, and just go lie on the internet
> ok hun!

>>56953006
> serious
> bluetooth
Now bro.
Baits are one thing.

But if you say such a retarded shit ever again, every audiophile on the world will make his number one priority to find you and hunt you fucking down.

Just no.
It's not cool.
Just say "install gentoo" or something.

>>56931398
Yeah, I don't believe this fake chart you just made

iPhone has always had the best battery life and the most SoT

>>56953031
Bluetooth 4.2 has more bandwidth and range than a 100 year old 3.5 jack. And about power, you can directly amp the headphones using a good battery rather than your 10 mili volt output from any phone. Sorry poorfag, but you've become obsolete.

>>56953081
OK I get it, I will let you bait, but here is some help.

> 4.2
I think you meant 5.

> Obsolete
The release of products is scheduled for late 2016 to early 2017.

> range, power, everything
Yeah and it makes coffee, heck it will even fuck your wife, because why not?

> Poor
The top, even best headphones use wires.
No, Beats is no best.

Also I don't think there is any more "lame" sight than seeing someone SWAP-BATTERIES. Or even CHARGE a headphone.
That is just so lame and unprofessional.
Like a kid.

>>56953153
>memes vs reality
Research everything I've said. Bluetooth 3 already has 24Mbps worth of bandwidth. I see where you're trying to get poorfag but Audeze, Sennheiser and just about every serious company is switching to wireless headphones. Btw your S8 will not have a 3.5 jack

>>56951285
Not him but a G5 owner. I like it. People make a big deal about the battery release part not being totally parallel but mines totally fine. Software is clean. Battery is decent. Fingerprint reader button is a little mushy but it scans totally fine so it goes unnoticed most of the time. If you need a phone now it's a good pick, but my suggestion would be to wait for the V20 by LG. Looks dope.

>>56953212
> Bandwidth
It's not about bandwidth.
Bluetooth 2 had EDR.
> 3mbit/s
> 2.1mbit/s in reality

That is already enough for 192kbps.
Now today we have Bluetooth v4 almost all smartphone knows it. We also have fresh Bluetooth earphones.

What's their quality like?
Dog-fucking-shit.
It sounds like farting in a tin can.

Now, now. We have AptX! A codec! Yay.
Which is again, not that adopted.

Ps.: Your fantasy sounds very, very nice.

> inb4 but people use them
Because it's convenient, I can see why. You put on a shitty pop music (Taylor Swift anyone?) and you listen to it on public transportation and street. This of course can make you get hit by a car, get mugged or stabbed, but you listened to Tay-Tay!!11

Again, that has nothing to do with quality.

> Quality
https://en-us.sennheiser.com/high-end-headphones
Maybe my browser is having some trouble, but I cannot really see any Bluetooth ones around that 2k range.
Is it my DPI or font settings?

>>56931398
I hate iPhones and I still don't get why people make threads like these.

Just don't get an iPhone and let the suckers have their overpriced toy. Why do people keep analyzing and scrutinizing products they don't like for reasons to have contempt for them? Can't you prefer something without having to justify it all the time?

>>56953320
By the way, APT-X is considered """The SOLUTION""" for high-end audio. Or well, at least better sounding audio. But support is rare. For example, good luck finding a head unit for cars that support it.

Top end headphones? Maybe.
Phones? Not that sure.

I forgot about your previous fantasy...
> Btw your S8 will not have a 3.5 jack
The S5 was the latest great device in the series.
The S6 was a glass trash with an Apple price tag.
The S7 is a glass trash with an Apple price tag.
The S7 Edge is usable, but it also had a burn case now, and it's very vulnerable.

And now?
The Note 7 just made them rethink everything.
The replacement program? Absolute failure, replacement units already exploding.

We might as well not see an S8 in the near future...

>>56939182
fug man I was quite set on the S7 edge but the htc 10 does look really good

>>56953265
Cheers mate.
Yeah for myself I want the V20.
I was kinda sad when the V10 got out and I just bought a Note 4, for fuck's sake.

But, all is not lost, I will buy a V20 now.
I am sad how LG messes up the unique features though.

> G2
> Back LED included in the back (!) volume rockers
Shit is crazy, they can see if I am calling, if I have a call.
My phone can face anyway, and see if I have a notification.
> G3/G4
> Back LED is gone
One of the best features. Fuck it, we have the back volume rockers.
Very comfortable place to adjust volume during call.
> G5/V20
> Back volume rocker is gone

.... I have no words.
They had the BEST thing, and now it's BARELY a thing.
How can you fuck up so much?
It's not a slip up, it's a downhill.

>>56931398
apple has had the best battery life since they came out.

ITT: asshurt fandroid retards

>>56953374
The S7 is more "fun"?
Aimed more towards teenagers probably?

The Sense on the 10 is much more business-feel like.
The case too, it's aluminium, feels solid, like a real fucking business phone.
I have an M7 spare phone. It's a whole other class.

>>56931398
>Android is better
>Here's our proof based on 3G usage

LOLZ

>>56953436
well, and it also has like the best display and camera, most powerful CPU (android)

I mean I get what you're trying to say, but Samsung is still producing top of the line phones

File: 4L_V1Q2Qmv6.jpg (76KB, 607x504px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 607x504px

>all these lagdroid apologists
Poorfag ban when?

>>56934309
Enjoying the bootloops?

>>56952089
1. not true, you can use icloud
2. mtp is a really shitty protocol, basically every implementation is broken, but windows does natively support it
3. normalfags get confused by exposing the filesystem, so apple's way is easier for them

>>56931398
who cares? like seriously, who talks for longer than 712 minutes at one time on the phone?

>>56953374
htc 10 is still full price here whereas s7 edge dropped 40%. so easy decision

>o wow look at this calltime
like who the fuck actually calls anyone anymore?
when will poorfags find a REAL issue with the iPhone?

>>56954911
it obv means that talking 30 mins on the phone is costing you more battery, too.

>>56931398
battery life is already "good enough" nowadays

this is like people that need to upgrade their desktop CPU every generation. Sandy bridge was and still is good enough. Before then there was a reason, but every phone post-Nexus 5 has good enough battery life

>>56938414
iPhone 6s wasn't better and had qcom.
in fact according to Apple, internet use in 3G increased from 10 hours to 12 hours and talk time in 3G stayed the same 14 hours.

so in reality Apple was never good at talk time in 3G compared to other phones and Apple does tell you up front. but people reading actual technical specs instead of going for blogspam isn't how the world works.

ayylmao

>>56931475
Bait set and match.
kys apple nog.

>>56942342
>Smaller display and less powerful processor.

>>56931475
>less functionality
explain. i'll wait.

>>56953374
i originally really wanted the htc 10. I loved the metal body, the carbon black was sexy as fuck. the high powered dac, the top notch specs, there was a lot to love. everything except for the price tag. couldn't justify it.

started looking into it again because of recent sales, but decided to make battery life the deciding factor, and the global model of the s7 and s7 edge (exynos chipset versions g930f-g935f) actually had better battery life than htc 10. they actually currently have the highest battery life of any high end phone i think.

the global exynos versions of the phones are the only ones being actively developed for by the xda community.

ALSO, the s7 and s7 edge global versions can be found for roughly the same price if not cheaper than the htc 10. made the s7 a no brainer for me.

it really is apples and oranges though, since the htc10 is still very comparable. if a lot of this doesn't matter to you, you could base the decision around which side you want the back button to be on.

>>56931398
>3g
ok grandpa

>>56951164
Literally everyone does

>>56958977
What kind of shithole do you live in where you even get a 3g signal

>>56931398
topkek

Fakeass chart + iphone battery is like twice as small as the rest

>>56934764
>10 hours for the m8
Wtf, I could barely manage 5 when I first got it.

>>56934519
>>>56931398 (OP)

>>Then, do a comparison on a more realistic scenario - internet browsing until it dies - but let's keep the same ceiling and color coding of the previous test to mask how closer the results are this time around

Yo dumbfuck, if they had altered the ceiling so that the top phone was 100% of the battery again, the differences between them would have been even more accentuated. How can you be this retarded, even as an iFag

>>56934764
>moto x pure isnt even on the list
the one thing i absolutely hate about my phone is the abysmal battery life. my g would last me two days sometimes but this fucker barely lasts me through work.

>>56960256
not him, but it just looks a little arbitrary given taht the SGS 7 is 677, the LG G5 is 640, an the iphone 7 is 615. the difference between the S7 and the G5 is greater than between the G5 and the 7, but the android phones have the same color coding for some reason.

also fixing the y axis would be reasonable in this case. it's clearly maxed out to ~1900 or so for the top row of tests, but 1900 doesn't have any natural meaning. it's just the emergent best performer. if we're setting the y axis by the empirical front runner, that's fine, but using the same scale for a categorically different test is at best lazy and at worst misleading.

people have done a lot of work studying information visualization. this doesn't need your kneejerk reactions

>no headphone jack

>>56960852
would've been kind of funny if someone did a quantitative review of smartphones and had a chart illustrating how long they were able to listen to music on their conventional headphones and the iphone just registered 0 minutes.