>$650 >1080p This is almost apple tier

>>56926601

I thought this, you can't charge premium prices for a low res screen.

1080p is acceptable for phones up to $300, anything more and Mr Shekelstein has arrived.

>>56926601
apple has water proofing though

it's worse than apple

oh also Verizon exclusive lol CDMAIDS

File: 1445137393442.jpg (17KB, 216x251px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 216x251px

>>56926739
>Not being on Verizon

>>56926601
1080p is plenty of dpi unless your phone is comically massive - even my 720p phone looks perfectly fine

Higher resolution directly translates to lower battery life and worse graphics performance, so why go higher than 1080?

(inb4 "graphics performance == gaming" - scrolling lag is the biggest reason for the "lagdroid" perception)

what town is that

>>56926953
>sub 2800mah battery
>no SD slot
>Snapdragon 821, a chip only used in cheap phones
>iphone clone, but worse
>ugly UI
>$650

Google REALLY fucked up here. If I had a $650 budget for a new smartphone, it would definitely not be some piece of shit android garbage like a Samsung or Pixel.

What's the point of trying to compete with apple at the ultra-premium price point? You can't just show up 8 years late and attempt to compete with the reigning champion.

No microSD, no waterproofing, no OIS, Fucking garbage.

>>56926739
>oh also Verizon exclusive lol CDMAIDS
Google Pixel doesn't work on Project Fi?

>>56926999
Pooville

>>56926739
>he's loyal to his inferior provider
I pity you. All the phone companies screw you. Might as well get something for being fucked.

>>56926601
what are you talking about lol

File: drink.png (7KB, 377x330px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 377x330px

>>56926601
>MUH PIXELS
you sound like a retard, any higher resolution at that size is ridiculous

>>56927318
I'm loyal to T-mobile which has been the cheapest national carrier since ATT finished buying out everyone else c2005

>>56927144
Snapdragon 821 is the best mobile CPU available for android devices right now.

But you're right on everythign else, it's shit and a shit value.

It should START at 64GB at least as well.

File: 1472391570118.jpg (45KB, 190x190px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 190x190px

>>56927438
Nobody needs 64gb of storage on their phone. Just store your waifu webms on the cloud.

>$1k AUD
$200+ for shipping given the conversation rate
Fucking kek
Do they really think pricing their phone like Apple will convince people it's "premium"?

File: image.jpg (132KB, 778x583px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 778x583px

>>56927461
>muh cloud

Fucking goyim

I've got loads of cute little girls you want me to store that on the cloud?

This cloud meme has to stop

>>56926601
>expecting high pixel density on a phone literally named pixel

It was there all the time, you just didn't want to see it.

>>56926601
>implying Apple has computers with the highest screen resolution

Take Apple's dick out of your ass and google about companies like Dell, Samsung who make computers with twice as much screen resolution than Apple computers for a fraction of the price of Macbooks.

File: skyoshock.txt.jpg (316KB, 1157x872px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1157x872px

>>56927615