DEFEND THIS
>>56912590
>cox
haha
are you not pleased?
is this not what you asked for?
>>56912590
Can't defend but this is due to cable cutting
Streaming is killing the cable side of these businesses, so instead of innovating and improving cable why not just make some of that lost profit back by increasing the price of internet that is needed to stream.
Fucked up but welcome to capatalism, this shit will continue unless the pseudo monopoly of cable companies ends
>cocks
$40 a month for 100/10 with cumcast here.
>>56912590
Thanks, capitalism
>>56912590
When it says Cox right there in the name, you know some sucking is going to be involved.
>>56912767
they used to be good with free, unannounced bandwidth upgrades
the rich need food too
>>56912590
>defending ISPs
>>56912590
Amerifat detected
Try moving to a country where the government isn't totally cucked by big corporations. We actually have competition out here in the rest of the world
>>56912590
Looks like your introductory rate expired.
Just call and threaten to cancel. If they don't go back to a price similar then call another provider, get a quote and call back.
Source : I work in retention in a call center for a cable company. If you have any question, ask me before I go to bed
>>56912690
I'm >>56913103 and I can tell you with complete honesty that cable companies ( especially small one) prefer internet customer than cable customer.
>why?
Cost
Let say you have a house with 4 TVs and those 4 tvs have cable boxes. One of them break down then you need to send a tech, replace the box,etc .
Also most of the income one cable part of the bill goes to pay the channel and not as profit.
Now let's compare an internet customer : cost is only the pipe that connects you to the others pipes.
Stupid kid can't dosnt know how to enter the password for the WiFi network ? Contact Sony.
Heck even we get more commissions for saving a internet only customer vs a cable only customer
IIRC we make about 1$ in profit per internet customer vs 0.60$ for cable customer