Is it secure? Is it safe?

File: 5H0m4t8.png (192KB, 1366x728px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 1366x728px

>>56898600

>>56898600
>Windows
Literal botnet, nothing you can possibly do will ever make that safe. Not even memeing.

>>56898600
I don't know

>>56898600
Safer than mainstream browsers
>>56898678
That's not OP's picture

>>56898667
Those open tabs thou. 9gag? Really? I hope you're on 9gag for trolling purposes.

>>56898600
At this point the only way to truly be a ghost on the Internet is to hack your own method of being unknown on it. It's what the real deal hackers do. People like The Jester. Know one knows who these people are, not even the government. Some of them use sites like Twitter and still are unknown. I have a few ideas how they do it though, some methods are legal, some illegal.

>>56898716
newfag get out

Make sure you run your own exit node.

>>56898927
How?

>>56898600
Yes. Yes.

>>56898678
It's fine on 7.

>>56898724

most of the routing infrastructure is monitored so if the nsa can't track them then they must have some pretty sophisticated networking skills.

>>56898600
use it behind 20 proxies based on 3rd world shitholes

>>56899201
Or you know, use a country which respects your fredom. Better yet, move there.

>>56898667
the best one is that with:
>how to unrape your sister

>>56899017
No, it's not.

Ignoring your potential for a backdoor from MS, nearly all exploits will target a Windows environment. Windows doesn't even have any form of kernel-level security module a la SELinux either.

But you're the one who's going to get a visit from the Feds at 6am so that's your problem.

>>56899265

Ok I'll bite.

What linux distro's have SELinux?

All of them?

I want to make the switch.

>>56899265
Idk, I don't live in cuckland, the state does nnot care what I browse. 7 seems safe enough.

>>56899275
Any of the RHEL-based will implement it by default, like Fedora/CentOS

Debian derivatives use AppArmor, but not usually enabled by default

>>56899451

Thank you.

What does it actually protect against? And Redhat is tied to the feds

File: 05102016_scrncp.png (272KB, 959x538px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 959x538px

>>56898716
Ye going 2 jail m80

>>56899509
>What does it actually protect against?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_access_control

>Redhat is tied to the feds
Microsoft tells NSA its backdoors

>>56899509
The idea for both of them is that the process which is profiled can only access the absolute minimum it needs in order to function. It is enforced at the kernel level.

For example, if there is an exploit with Firefox ESR which allows arbitrary code execution on a victim's system, this would prevent it from writing, reading, or modifying files which the Firefox process doesn't have access to.

An example of an apparmor profile for the Tor Browser is at https://github.com/Whonix/apparmor-profile-torbrowser/blob/master/etc/apparmor.d/home.*.tor-browser_*.Browser.start-tor-browser

TAILS OS already implements a similar AppArmor profile and is what I'd recommend for secure TBB usage.

File: 1466555827587.png (94KB, 247x248px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 247x248px

>>56898600
>monitor size
>track you
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
fucking paranoid autistic manchildren

>>56899717
>I don't know what headers are xD

>>56899717
The browser screen size can be used to identify you, you fucking computer illiterate moron.

>>56899732

>literally everyone has the same resolution

>HERP DERP TRACK

having the shitty tor default is more trackable

>>56899717
css rules leak metadata you tech illiterate monkey.

>>56899729
>>56899732
My resolution is 1920x1080
I dare you to find out who I am, manbabbies

>>56899729
>>56899732
But how? So many people have 1080p screens

>tfw i have 1280x1024

>>56899748
the window can have any size as long as it fits in the screen. this is not hard.

File: 1461492098872.jpg (14KB, 262x263px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 262x263px

>>56899767
They simply can't
neckbeards are just afraid to get their loli shota collections discovered

>>56899763
You'd be one of the few retards using Tor with a different screen size. That's how you moron.

>>56899784
>neckbeards are just afraid to get their loli shota collections discovered
But that's not even illegal

File: 1463595932659.jpg (441KB, 800x1020px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 800x1020px

>>56899788
it depends where you live.

>>56899788
>>56899802
a few weeks ago i found out that it's fucking illegal here in my country
had to microwave all my electronics im not taking the fucking chances mi neg(i love blacks i am using the n word to express a unique feeling only the n word can produce. i mean nothing from it)roes

>>56899802
>>56899822
Torrenting copyrighted material is illegal everywhere yet 99.9% of the people don't use anything to hide their IPs when downloading

In my country there are people selling pirated copies of movies and video games out in the open and in malls

The authorities literally do not give a single fuck unless you provoke them

>>56899787
>implying i use tor
if you have CP to hide, just put it in a separate hard drive on a separate machine isolated from any network
your life is already wasted, don't waste it any further by being that paranoid

>>56899837
> tfw I hide my shit in an EncFS folder in the middle of everything else

No one ever suspects that I have a pdf on how to bake cakes with sperm in there

>>56899837
>argumentum ad hominem
>straw man argument

You police state shills all use the same illogical tactics.

You failed, you've been proven wrong. Screen size can be used to identify you. Going on tangents is what you're doing to avoid the fact that you're wrong.

>>56899748
Everyone using the Tor default is what makes no one identifiable. Only the retards who change the screen size are identifiable by it. Why is so hard for you retards to understand simple concepts?

>>56899851
>Screen size can be used to identify you.
[citation needed]

>>56899873
You're a moron.

>>56899864
>Only the retards who change the screen size are identifiable by it
But even the default size changes depending on the screen size

>>56899834
Whether authorities give a fuck or not, is another story.

anon made the claim that it isn't illegal to own or draw lolicon, and I was merely telling him that this is not true.
In some countries, like France, lolicon is illegal.

>>56899887
>France
what. really? i thought we wus bffs with the japs and shiet.

File: 1442429780234.jpg (52KB, 716x724px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 716x724px

>>56899875
>I don't have proof, i'm just paranoid, pls send help :(
I rest my case

File: sample-bfea9c3e553235ffd265761e386a8815.jpg (135KB, 850x1100px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 850x1100px

>>56899897
>En France, toute « représentation d'un mineur lorsque cette image ou cette représentation présente un caractère pornographique » est interdite à la production ainsi que, depuis mars 2002, à la simple détention.
>Des personnes ont déjà été condamnées pour détention ou diffusion de lolicon, voir par exemple la jurisprudence du 12 septembre 2007 (pourvoi n° 06-8676314) (« l'objet du délit, qui, auparavant, était défini comme l'image d'un mineur, [...] est étendu à toute représentation d'un mineur ; qu'il peut donc s'agir d'images non réelles représentant un mineur imaginaire [...] », extrait de la jurisprudence).

We live in sad times, my friend.

>>56898678
>Literal botnet
You are a complete idiot and you don't even know what botnet is.

>>56899864
If you change your screen size, you make your pool of anonymity smaller and also remove yourself from the default pool of anonymity

>>56899900
>I'm incapable of finding information on the Internet by myself
>I can't walk across the street without holding hands with a grownup
>I can't wipe my own ass

>>56899900
He's actually right though, it's one of the things used to fingerprint you.

https://panopticlick.eff.org/ collects screen size information, for example.

>>56899948
Now that's he proven wrong, him >>56899900
he will continue ad hom and straw man arguments, basically random namecalling and arguing things unrelated to the screen size being used to track people.

>>56899948
disable javascript (which you should have disabled anyhow in Tor browser) and it can't do jack shit.

>>56898600
No. There are many honeypot exit nodes and many exit nodes in general that track activity.
Use i2p

>>56900084
>No. There are many honeypot exit nodes and many exit nodes in general that track activity.
What If I use Tor exclusively to browse onions?

>>56899948
not if you have javascript off

Is FreeNet safer than Tor?

It seems like it's slipped under the radar, no one ever talk about it. I've heard it's openly got more cp and shit like that. But I've never heard about anyone gotten caught using it.

>>56900071
>>56900135
You're right but I don't even user Tor or care much about this stuff. I was just responding to that guy saying screen size couldn't be used to track you.

>>56900135
>>56900071
You're still going on with the straw man arguments.

>>56900143
this is rather interesting. looks like a real pseudo distributed network

>>56900143
>Is FreeNet safer than Tor?
Most likely safer than Tor.

>>56900256
Oh! So screen size really doesn't matter if javascript is turned off. I never even imagined using Tor with javascript, it defeats the purpose of even using it for anonimity.

>>56898724
Read what phineas fisher does in his multiple txts

>>56898742
troled ez

>>56900301
Can't post on 4chan without Javascript, so you could be fingerprinted by screen size if you enable JS to post. I'm only making this point because some people think just using Tor is all that's needed. There's some retards who even log into Google accounts while using Tor.

>>56900301
please remember that most people that use tor dont necesarily have any kind of education, they just want anonimity out of the box but for some reason javascript was put on true by default because people complained that they couldnt see some websites correctly.

js is a trap.

>>56900327
>I was only pretending to be a newfag I swear

>>56900338
You are incorrect, I am right now posting without it.

>>56900364
I bet you think you have anonymity. How about netstat-ing in your terminal and seeing all the ip addresses from Google connected to you.

>>56900338
Most Tor exit nodes are banned on 4chan anyway

>>56900381
I know that. But people this are clueless >>56900364

>>56900374
absolutely 0

>>56900394
You sound like a disinformation agent. They post threads like this to spread lies like what you're saying. Either that or you're really stupid.

>>56900394
Post a screencap of the netstat. Don't show your ip addresses, just the ones connected to you. I dare you. I know you're lying. If you're posting on 4chan there is at least one ip address connected to you from Google. moot didn't get that job at Google for nothing you moron.

>>56898678
Memes can make anything possible.

>>56900418
Asking for screenshots for proof over the internet. Are you really that insecure?

>>56900471
I'm calling you a liar you fucking moron. You really are just stupid.

File: captcha.png (248KB, 1275x644px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1275x644px

>>56900471
http://www.securityweek.com/fbi-says-leaky-captcha-was-used-locate-silk-road-server-experts-doubtful

>>56898679
Can you repeat that question

>>56900518
Ulbritch used his real email on stackoverflow asking a question about php then on bitcointalk advertising silkroad he used an account there registered again to his real email.

Ulbritch was just really bad at opsec, He had no idea what he was doing. I'm surprised he lasted as long as he did.